| === thomasb9511 is now known as thomasb9511|Away | ||
| === thomasb9511|Away is now known as thomasb9511 | ||
| === thomasb9511 is now known as thomasb9511|Away | ||
| darkxst | Noskcaj, why aren | 10:05 |
|---|---|---|
| darkxst | why aren't your g-i/gjs patches in the sponsorship queue? | 10:05 |
| darkxst | bug 1283551 | 10:06 |
| ubot5 | bug 1283551 in Ubuntu GNOME "gjs-console crashed with signal 5" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1283551 | 10:06 |
| === prth is now known as prth|away | ||
| === prth is now known as prth|away | ||
| === prth|away is now known as prth | ||
| === prth is now known as prth|away | ||
| === prth|away is now known as prth | ||
| === prth is now known as prth|away | ||
| === prth|away is now known as prth | ||
| === prth is now known as prth|away | ||
| === prth|away is now known as prth | ||
| === prth is now known as prth|away | ||
| === prth|away is now known as prth | ||
| slinnky | yeah baby | 17:06 |
| slinnky | DASPRiD, voluptous velociraptor baby... You got my vote | 17:07 |
| * slinnky beats the chest | 17:07 | |
| === prth is now known as prth|away | ||
| === prth|away is now known as prth | ||
| Kopfgeldjaeger | darkxst: Hi! Shouldn't gdm+nvidia optimus work by using your and the xorg-edgers PPA? For me, using the nvidia card does not work at all (with the nvidia-340 driver) | 18:25 |
| Kopfgeldjaeger | brb | 18:27 |
| Kopfgeldjaeger | Xorg log after "prime-select nvidia" and "service gdm restart": http://pastebin.com/H9nzr8XW - I can only see a black/dark screen | 18:34 |
| === prth is now known as prth|away | ||
| Kopfgeldjaeger | x64, nvidia-340 340.24-0ubuntu1~xedgers14.04, gdm 3.10.0.1-0ubuntu3.1~trusty1 | 18:35 |
| Kopfgeldjaeger | brb | 18:39 |
| === prth|away is now known as prth | ||
| === prth is now known as prth|away | ||
| shay_shay | hello | 19:59 |
| shay_shay | i know the official answer is not to use the gnome staging PPA, but what if one was determined to use it? is it really broken or really guaranteed to break or is that just what they say to scare people away who arent committed? | 20:00 |
| shay_shay | e.g. on fedora 20 theres a copr (like a ppa) which has 3.12, and it works fine | 20:00 |
| shay_shay | but they say the same thing, but honestly my ubuntu 14.04 install with stable unity broke sooner than my f20 with 3.12 on it did(because it didnt, and ubuntu did) | 20:01 |
| dotgokul | shay_shay, That ppa is based on the stable gnome 3.12. So it is quite fine for me. I am using that ppa along with unity not gnome-shell. Ambiance theme still needs work for the new nautilus for example. If you want anyone to give a warranty no one will, nor should they have to :-) If you are familiar and confident about ppa-purge or even uninstalling the offending bits and re-installing from the right repository, using command line in the worst | 20:43 |
| dotgokul | case, I think you can give it a try. I am very comfortable as of now with all that. | 20:43 |
| Noskcaj | darkxst, I'd not subscribed sponsors because i wasn't sure if it worked (was waiting for someone to test) | 20:48 |
| Noskcaj | I'll subscribe them now | 20:48 |
| shay_shay | dotgokul: thanks i will do then | 20:49 |
| shay_shay | its not a mission critical install anyway | 20:49 |
| Noskcaj | darkxst, fyi: gnome 3.12 is going to unstable this week | 22:22 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!