[07:47] <apw> hallyn, ack
[08:22] <apw> BLZbubba, as Sarvatt indicated they are built with do_extras_package=0 generally
[15:52] <hallyn> anybody know of a clean way to have btrfs subvolume delete also delete all subvolumes which are under it?
[16:04] <apw> hallyn, not me sadly
[16:14] <hallyn> apw: drat, i guess i'l lhave eto walk the list of subvolumes and do strcmp :(
[16:14] <apw> hallyn, i would not like to claim to know very much about btrfs, others in our team have usd it more
[16:15]  * cking has no idea either
[16:29] <BLZbubba> apw, Sarvatt: ok cool thanks, I'll give "do_extras_package=0" a try
[16:34] <BLZbubba> i'd like to figure out why i can't insmod my packages into the pre-built kernel, but that isn't nearly as important if I can just run on the one I build
[18:57]  * arges wonders why linux-image-3.13.0-30 amd64 ddebs didn't build...
[19:07] <marrusl> Hello.  Has anyone seen reports of 3.13.0-31 or -32 causing problems with intel graphics and networking?
[19:08] <marrusl> In my case it was on a laptop, but I'm still getting details.  also possibly worth noting: the report I have was a hwe 3.13 running on precise.
[19:13] <apw> marrusl, i have not heard anything specific, file a bug against the package  "linux"
[19:13] <marrusl> apw, yep.  collecting info. thanks
[19:16] <arges> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/?field.searchtext=3.13.0-31&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch=&fie
[19:16] <arges> ld.has_no_package=
[19:16] <arges> that's an ugly link
[19:16] <arges> marrusl: ^^^ anyway nothing from my search
[19:24] <marrusl> thanks arges.  i'll see what i can find out.