[09:04] <cjwatson> xnox: ^-
[09:04] <xnox> cjwatson: tah.
[09:05] <cjwatson> xnox: I think file conflicts need to be Conflicts/Replaces, not Breaks/Replaces, though (just noticed after accepting)
[09:05] <cjwatson> xnox: Breaks stops the two packages being configured at the same time, but permits them to be unpacked at the same time, and that's what will break in the case of a file conflict
[09:06] <cjwatson> xnox: So I suggest fixing that before this is through -proposed
[09:06] <xnox> hm. ok.
[09:08] <xnox> right, because both libplymouth2 & libplymouth4 "... will continue to provide the same file"
[09:08] <xnox> it's not like i have update libplymouth2 without the file, and ability to coinstall with libplymouth4. Which is a shame, for backports.
[09:12] <cjwatson> xnox: Wait, hang on, there's Replaces.  I'm not awake yet.  Let me check chapter and verse from policy
[09:13] <cjwatson> xnox: Sorry, of course the Breaks is basically just there to stop libplymouth2 being put back later, and Conflicts would needlessly impede upgrades.  Leave it as it is :-)
[09:14] <cjwatson> libplymouth2 won't meaningfully continue to provide the same file, because it will go away
[09:14] <xnox> yeah, that was my logic.
[09:17] <cjwatson> You were right, I was wrong.  As you were
[09:18] <xnox> i'm very sceptical when that happens though. It's blocked in proposed, will check dist-upgrade to work without a hitch, after mountall/casper rebuilds.
[09:20] <cjwatson> I think it will be fine due to the Replaces
[09:38] <xnox> cjwatson: however, casper & mountall builds fail to remove libplymouth2 and replace it with libplymouth4 -> The following packages have been kept back:libplymouth2 plymouth & The following packages have unmet dependencies: libplymouth-dev : Depends: libplymouth4 (= 0.9.0-0ubuntu1) but it is not going to be installed
[09:39] <xnox> and given that mountall is in the buildd chroot, would i need to do "bootstrap" build a version of libplymouth4 without the apport file & then put it back in?
[09:39] <xnox> imho, why is apport source file hook in libplymouth* instead of plymouth itself (which has plymouthd, et.al.)?
[09:41] <cjwatson> xnox: Right, they don't remove libplymouth2, but the Replaces should mean that's OK
[09:41] <cjwatson> Oh, kept back, umm, you'd need to check Debug::pkgProblemResolver=true
[09:42] <cjwatson> Moving the apport hook is probably correct, but let's see what the actual cause of this is
[10:00] <rbasak> Any chance an SRU team member can take a look at juju-core and juju-quickstart in the Trusty queue, please?
[16:08] <Laney> Would someone please promote uhttpmock? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uhttpmock/+bug/1327458
[16:08] <Laney> libgdata is depwait
[16:08] <cjwatson> Laney: looking
[16:10] <cjwatson> Laney: done
[16:10] <Laney> Ta