[07:51] <Noskcaj> darkxst, gnome 3.12, bluez5, and upower 0.99 are all now in debian
[07:53] <Noskcaj> Let the games begin
[10:31] <darkxst> Noskcaj, did they do full transitions for bluez5 and upower?
[10:32] <darkxst> none of the unity stuff has been ported for upower yet afaik
[10:32] <darkxst> gnome-desktop is still in limbo
[10:33] <darkxst> and I relly doubt seb would like too add a bluez transition to that!
[10:34] <darkxst> ricotz, did you get your system fixed? anychance you can look at the tracker rpath stuff sometime this week?
[11:16] <ricotz> darkxst, it seems to work again, but the systemd boot is broken
[11:17] <ricotz> darkxst, will try to take a look
[11:19] <ricotz> and yeah bluez5 is quite something
[11:19] <darkxst> ricotz, I know, i think we would be ok not to have it this cycle
[11:20] <darkxst> systemd boot was always broken on my desktop, been meaning to try 208 out
[11:21] <darkxst> only tested that in a VM so far
[11:21] <ricotz> it worked here fine until some cgmanager and kernel updates
[11:21] <darkxst> gnome really needs 210+ though right?
[11:22] <ricotz> 212 iirc
[11:22] <ricotz> gnome 3.13/14 that is
[11:23] <darkxst> 210 and 214 are the 'so called' stable branches, if there is such a thing in Lennarts world
[11:23] <ricotz> hehe, i see
[11:23] <darkxst> I don't think they actually do any bug fix releases though
[11:23] <darkxst> just pile patches into git branches
[11:24] <ricotz> i dont follow the changes closely but yeah since there are no branches besides master
[11:25] <darkxst> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable/
[11:25] <ricotz> ah there is a separate repo
[11:26] <darkxst> seem to be a lot of commits in there for stable branches though
[11:26] <ricotz> still requires a snapshot since there are no releases
[11:27] <darkxst> yup
[11:27] <darkxst> and there are only 48 patches in ubuntu systemd
[11:27] <ricotz> did pitti already merged 208-6?
[11:28] <darkxst> I think its still blocked on systemd-shim supporting cgroups
[11:29] <ricotz> oh, i think there was something with that in the last last shim upload
[11:30] <ricotz> darkxst, btw don't bother to look at tracker 1.1.1
[11:30] <darkxst> ricotz, wasn't planning on it
[11:30] <darkxst> just wanting to get 1.0 into main for nautilus search provider
[11:31] <ricotz> it is quite borked due misnamed dev files
[11:31] <ricotz> pushed 1.0.2 to the ppa
[11:36] <darkxst> right, I hooked up the unit tests on jenkins, plan to push 1.0.2 once I can address all didiers other comments
[11:36] <darkxst> shlibs.local seems right to me though
[11:39] <darkxst> functional-tests seem pretty broken
[11:39] <darkxst> which just leaves the rpath thing, which might be ok if we can justify it, but I don't really get why they are needed in the first place
[12:01] <MrChrisDruif> o/
[12:02] <MrChrisDruif> Is there an offtopic channel for ubuntu-gnome by any chance?
[12:21] <ricotz> darkxst, there is no real rpath usage at all, it is just causes by a pretty outdated way to initialize the buildsystem
[12:32] <darkxst> ricotz, can you add a comment about it on the MIR
[12:32] <darkxst> ?
[12:33] <darkxst> bug 1313996
[14:54] <ceed^> I'm running 14.04 with the Staging PPA (3.12) and notice these extremely long confirmation dialogs when you for instance cancel an e-mail. Is this a Gnome 3.12 problem, or?
[14:55] <ceed^> An example here: http://bit.ly/1sofygS
[21:10] <Noskcaj> darkxst, full transitions i think, just a few other packages were left behind
[23:38] <darkxst> Noskcaj, ok, can you go through upower bug and mark all packages that are fixed in debian
[23:40] <darkxst> ceed^, maybe a theme bug? can you test with adwaita?