[00:20] <bluesabre> cjwatson: can you give some advice... it seems menulibre and xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin are not included in the trusty packageset.  How can i request their inclusion?
[00:20] <bluesabre> and any other packages that I find we ship but are not included
[00:27] <rbasak> bluesabre: packageset for upload rights? Email the DMB for those.
[00:33] <bluesabre> thanks rbasak
[09:31] <xnox> upstart/trusty SRU is missing one commit from what's already in utopic ( https://launchpadlibrarian.net/178068270/upstart_1.12.1-0ubuntu10_1.12.1-0ubuntu11.diff.gz ) hence caused proposed regression bug #1343905 ... and hence above brow paper back SRU fix up.
[09:32] <xnox> cjwatson: would you please accept the fix-up of above ^
[09:36] <ochosi> slangasek: hey, we're in a bit of a rush with the xdg-utils patch. it's a very tiny patch but fixes a nasty regression in xubuntu where the screensaver always blanks (even when video is fullscreen), would be great to get that in 14.04.1, so if you have time to approve it...  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-locker/+bug/1309744
[09:40] <cjwatson> xnox: done
[09:40] <xnox> cjwatson: thanks a lot.
[09:45] <ochosi> cjwatson: if you feel like taking a look at the xdg-utils ^ upload too, that'd be great
[09:45] <cjwatson> ochosi: I was just looking.  Why does it remove the existing case for that variable being the empty string?
[09:45] <ochosi> cjwatson: because that case is actually a duplicate in the code
[09:46] <ochosi> because ubuntu carries a patch that is already integrated in the source
[09:46]  * cjwatson looks at the context
[09:46] <ochosi> hence, code duplication
[09:46] <cjwatson> Ah yes
[09:46] <ochosi> i know it's weird (which is probably why i've had to explain this a few times already to different ppl :))
[09:46] <cjwatson> Seems vulnerable to rebase accidents, but OK for now
[09:46] <ochosi> i just did the most minimal fix to get it into trusty
[09:46] <ochosi> for utopic, i'll work out something better
[09:47] <ochosi> in fact, i'll try to get it upstreamed...
[09:47] <cjwatson> accepted
[09:47] <ochosi> thanks a bunch!
[09:48] <didrocks> yeah, I had the same question when sponsoring for utopic :)
[09:48] <ochosi> :]
[09:48] <ochosi> it's a very natural/obvious question
[09:49] <ochosi> i kinda asked myself that when looking at xdg-screensaver for the first time ;)
[09:49] <didrocks> heh
[09:50] <ochosi> hm, how long approx until i can test/verify it from trusty-proposed?
[09:50] <Laney> The first patch should probably be fixed to not add that duplicate case in the first place ...
[09:50] <ochosi> Laney: yeah, actually it's only about dropping a patch iirc
[10:04] <cjwatson> ochosi: 20mins ish?
[10:04] <cjwatson> maybe less
[10:07] <ochosi> ok, will check then, thanks!
[15:26] <slangasek> ochosi: yep, looks fine, releasing to -updates.  BTW, who's responsible for the two duplicate cases in that script?  (I guess not you :)
[15:39] <ochosi> slangasek: hehe, no, not me :) i didn't want to blame it on anyone, so i never investigated. i'll try to get this fixed for utopic though...
[15:42] <ochosi> slangasek: fwiw, the xubuntu-default-settings patch is still awaiting verification when it's just a settings-change for something that was already SRUd, if you have a minute to take a peek
[15:43] <ochosi> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/1303736
[15:43] <ochosi> (it's part of this really terrible huge bugreport, but the last piece is just flipping the settings switch to make it work for new users, which we forgot before, so it'd be great to have that on the iso too...)
[15:44] <slangasek> ochosi: we normally don't release SRUs on a Friday due to limited availability for dealing with fallout afterwards; I made an exception for the straightforward xdg-utils one, but I think the rest should be able to wait until Monday
[15:47] <ochosi> slangasek: i understand, just thought i'd mention it cause it's a setting for something that was already verified (and is already in the archive)