| === jcw4 is now known as jcw4|Zzz | ||
| === CyberJacob|Away is now known as CyberJacob | ||
| === CyberJacob is now known as CyberJacob|Away | ||
| === cliff-hm is now known as cliff-mtg | ||
| === psivaa is now known as psivaa-afk | ||
| === jcw4|Zzz is now known as jcw4 | ||
| ctlaugh | can anyone offer some assistance with python-jujuclient? | 15:01 |
|---|---|---|
| === psivaa-afk is now known as psivaa | ||
| kirkland | marcoceppi: howdy! can you give some attention to https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1342847 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1342843 ? | 15:52 |
| _mup_ | Bug #1342847: please add transcode-cluster bundle to the charm store <Juju Charms Collection:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1342847> | 15:52 |
| _mup_ | Bug #1342843: please include transcode charm in charm store <Juju Charms Collection:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1342843> | 15:52 |
| marcoceppi | kirkland: sure thin | 15:53 |
| === marcoceppi changed the topic of #juju to: Welcome to Juju! || Docs: http://juju.ubuntu.com/docs || FAQ: http://goo.gl/MsNu4I || Review Queue: http://goo.gl/9yBZuv || Unanswered Questions: http://goo.gl/dNj8CP || Weekly Reviewers: mbruzek && whit || News and stuff: http://reddit.com/r/juju | ||
| tvansteenburgh | anyone seen this and know how to work around? http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7856024/ | 16:00 |
| marcoceppi | tvansteenburgh: is that local provider in lxc? | 16:11 |
| kirkland | marcoceppi: thanks; it would be fantastic if that could land today-ish :-) | 16:22 |
| tvansteenburgh | marcoceppi: no, local provider in virtualbox | 16:22 |
| jose | happy sysadmin day! | 16:26 |
| mbruzek | to you to jose | 16:28 |
| mbruzek | Happy Friday jose! | 16:28 |
| jose | thanks! | 16:28 |
| mbruzek | kirkland the transcode README could be markdown, looks like you duplicated a step step 5 also | 16:33 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, charm add readme will generate the markdown template that is recommended | 16:33 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: okay, great -- is that all that's blocking it? | 17:14 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, no it is just what I found so far | 17:15 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: Error: add is not a valid subcommand | 17:15 |
| jose | kirkland: try `juju charm add readme`? | 17:16 |
| kirkland | http://paste.ubuntu.com/7857501/ | 17:16 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: can you just point me to your favorite README.md in the charm store, and I'll clone that? | 17:22 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, in meeting just a second. jose has a few good ones. | 17:23 |
| mbruzek | jose can you give kirkland a good example | 17:23 |
| jose | sure, owncloud will do, sec, grabbing the link | 17:24 |
| kirkland | thx | 17:25 |
| jose | kirkland: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7857553/ is the one given by 'charm add readme' | 17:25 |
| jose | also, I quite like the Chamilo one | 17:26 |
| jose | https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~charmers/charms/precise/chamilo/trunk/view/head:/README.md | 17:26 |
| sebas5384 | hey! o/ | 17:52 |
| sebas5384 | :) | 17:52 |
| sebas5384 | there's any way that I can help to get the Drupal charm reviewed ? | 17:53 |
| sebas5384 | :) | 17:53 |
| sebas5384 | we are planning to divulge how to deploy and scale Drupal with using the charm | 17:54 |
| sebas5384 | and if the fact of being a recommended charm is really important, and the nice logo will appear in the charm too hehe | 17:55 |
| === CyberJacob|Away is now known as CyberJacob | ||
| kirkland | mbruzek: jose: okay, readme now markdown; what's next? | 18:01 |
| jose | kirkland: which branch should I take a look at? | 18:02 |
| marcoceppi | sebas5384: it's definitely in the review queue, http://manage.jujucharms.com/tools/review-queue should be looked at shortly! | 18:02 |
| * jose just joined for the readme stuff :) | 18:02 | |
| sebas5384 | thanks for the update marcoceppi ! | 18:02 |
| === CyberJacob is now known as CyberJacob|Away | ||
| === scuttle|afk is now known as scuttlemonkey | ||
| kirkland | jose: mbruzek: looks like both of you are deploying now? | 19:35 |
| * jose is | 19:35 | |
| mbruzek | kirkland, I deployed and tried the first config example in the new README | 19:35 |
| * kirkland is deploying now, too | 19:35 | |
| mbruzek | kirkland, looking at the logs on transcode/0 I see a loop | 19:35 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: yep, waiting until all worker nodes are done | 19:36 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: how many nodes/ | 19:36 |
| kirkland | ? | 19:36 |
| mbruzek | 4 total | 19:36 |
| mbruzek | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7858501/ | 19:36 |
| mbruzek | It does not seem to exit from this repeating pattern | 19:36 |
| mbruzek | looks like 0 is done. | 19:37 |
| jose | kirkland: I'll ping you in 5-10 when this is done :) | 19:38 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: can I see ls -alF /srv? | 19:38 |
| mbruzek | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7858521/ | 19:39 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: uno momento, I'm trying to reproduce it now | 19:40 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, Where is the output written to? I didn't see that in the new README. The old README told me about the web url to hit, but not what the output file would be named. | 19:41 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: good point; I'll update that. it'll be in /srv/, which is actually served out by apache2 on every single node | 19:42 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, I also copied a video from my phone to the system. that is what 20140408_*.mp4 is | 19:42 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: so you can just point a browser to any node | 19:42 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: cool, that should work | 19:42 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, seems stuck on the first one. | 19:42 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: which bzr rev of the charm are you on? | 19:42 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: r8? | 19:42 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, no let me destroy and boostrap again | 19:43 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: okay, I'm bootstrapping now | 19:43 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: deploying.... | 19:49 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: total of 8 nodes | 19:49 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, I have a total of 5 now | 19:50 |
| kirkland | mbarnett: k | 19:50 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: k; mbarnett: sorry :-) | 19:50 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: nearly up... | 19:52 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, ran this command $ juju set transcode input_url=http://download.blender.org/demo/old_demos/diditdoneit.mpg output_size=640x360 | 19:52 |
| kirkland | jose: 25 nodes, is that right? | 19:53 |
| jose | kirkland: yep! 25 nodes | 19:53 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: I just ran the same | 19:53 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: downloading mpg... | 19:54 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: mine split into 8 parts, and they're each transcoding now | 19:55 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, I don't see the mount on transcode/0 . If I run sudo mount | grep srv I get nothing. | 19:56 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: did you add the relation? | 19:56 |
| mbruzek | Yes I did. http://paste.ubuntu.com/7858678/ | 19:58 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: is /srv/ mounted correctly in any of the other transcode/* ? | 19:58 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: I'm running right now against MAAS, on an Orange Box, and everything is mounted correctly | 19:58 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: perhaps a problem with NFS traffic in EC2? | 19:59 |
| jose | EC2 works fine | 19:59 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, I am running local lxc containers | 19:59 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: oh, hmm, well, maybe nfs isn't the best shared-fs for lxc? | 19:59 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: I've never tried nfs mounts inside of lxc | 20:00 |
| * mbruzek is switching to hp cloud | 20:01 | |
| kirkland | interestingly, I just had 1 out of my 8 nodes not mount NFS correctly | 20:02 |
| kirkland | 2014-07-25 19:52:48 INFO shared-fs-relation-changed + mount -t nfs -o rsize=8192,wsize=8192 10.14.100.6:/srv/data/transcode /srv | 20:03 |
| kirkland | 2014-07-25 19:52:48 INFO shared-fs-relation-changed mount.nfs: access denied by server while mounting 10.14.100.6:/srv/data/transcode | 20:03 |
| kirkland | 2014-07-25 19:52:48 INFO shared-fs-relation-changed + juju-log 'mount failed: /srv' | 20:03 |
| kirkland | looks like the nfs service wasn't up yet, when I tried to make this relation | 20:03 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, I saw a similar error in my log (which is no sadly deleted) | 20:05 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, you have retry logic in the mount though right? | 20:05 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: I'll need to look again | 20:06 |
| mbruzek | for try in {1..3}; do | 20:06 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: okay; I hand mounted nfs on the one bad node, and did a juju set, and my transcode job finished immediately | 20:07 |
| kirkland | juju set transcode input_url=http://download.blender.org/demo/old_demos/diditdoneit.mpg | 20:07 |
| kirkland | jose: where are you stuck now? | 20:07 |
| jose | kirkland: check the logs - it says something about invalid data | 20:07 |
| kirkland | jose: ah, okay, let me try that url | 20:08 |
| kirkland | jose: tbh, I haven't tried a .divx file yet; I've successfully done avi, mpg, mp4, mkv, ogg, mov | 20:08 |
| jose | so there's another thing there - if something fails on the other nodes it's gonna be stuck in a loop | 20:09 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, does the basename get renamed or does the output have the same extension | 20:09 |
| kirkland | jose: I suspect the install hook might need to add some additional codec packages | 20:09 |
| mbruzek | ? | 20:09 |
| jose | and there's no way for me to touch and cut that loop | 20:09 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: the output will tack on the resolution, codecs, and an mp4 | 20:09 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, ack | 20:09 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: so for mine: diditdoneit.mpg_640x360_x264_aac.mp4 | 20:10 |
| kirkland | mbarnett: I'll add that to the readme | 20:10 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: ^ | 20:10 |
| kirkland | jose: downloading .divx | 20:11 |
| jose | kirkland: what do you mean? | 20:12 |
| kirkland | jose: I'm trying to reproduce your failure | 20:12 |
| jose | oh, ok | 20:12 |
| kirkland | jose: and my run is currently wgetting your .divx example | 20:12 |
| kirkland | jose: I'm trying to figure out what additional packages might be necessary to support that | 20:13 |
| jose | ok, cool! | 20:13 |
| kirkland | jose: okay, same problem here | 20:14 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: I upped the retries in the shared-fs relation from 3 to 60 | 20:16 |
| mbruzek | jose and kirkland if the divx codec is not free it would be appropriate to list that in the known limitations. | 20:16 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: ack; | 20:17 |
| * mbruzek suspects divx is not free, remembers something about divx in the past | 20:17 | |
| automatemecolema | so I have a unit of a service stuck in a dying state. Anyway to get this guy to just die | 20:19 |
| mbruzek | automatemecolema, You could juju destroy-machine # with the one it is on | 20:20 |
| mbruzek | automatemecolema, by chance were you using debug-hooks ? | 20:20 |
| kirkland | jose: okay -- could you try a different input format? | 20:20 |
| jose | kirkland: I could, but I'll have to re-deploy - the loop cannot be cut | 20:20 |
| kirkland | jose: ? | 20:20 |
| kirkland | jose: sure you can | 20:20 |
| kirkland | just update the config | 20:20 |
| kirkland | there's a couple of killalls in there | 20:21 |
| jose | but the first instance of the config-changed hook would need to be terminated | 20:21 |
| kirkland | jose: this just worked fine for me: juju set transcode input_url=http://download.blender.org/demo/old_demos/diditdoneit.mpg | 20:21 |
| kirkland | jose: hmm | 20:21 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, jose brings up a good point. When my local one was stuck I tried different config options and the old loop never exited. | 20:22 |
| kirkland | jose: okay, I can add a kill switch | 20:22 |
| jose | would be awesome | 20:22 |
| kirkland | jose: mbruzek: for now, you can just touch the DONE files | 20:22 |
| kirkland | while [ $(ls ${filename}.part*.${format}.DONE | wc -l) -lt $total_nodes ]; do | 20:22 |
| automatemecolema | mbruzek, I think we'll just delete the machine, I was just trying to avoid that | 20:23 |
| jose | kirkland: are you applying your change now? so I can branch and re-deploy | 20:23 |
| automatemecolema | mbruzek, my consultant was logged into debug-hooks at some point, but not sure when | 20:23 |
| kirkland | jose: yes, give me a minute | 20:23 |
| jose | np | 20:23 |
| mbruzek | automatemecolema, In some cases the debug hooks command will prevent a charm from completely dying | 20:23 |
| mbruzek | automatemecolema, you can try juju resolved --retry charm/# | 20:24 |
| kirkland | jose: mbruzek: how would you like the kill switch to work? touch a file? add a config option killall=true | 20:24 |
| automatemecolema | mbruzek, yea I tried that several times | 20:24 |
| jose | kirkland: probably not a kill switch | 20:24 |
| jose | but 'if retried for 10m then quit' | 20:24 |
| kirkland | kill_all_jobs: | 20:25 |
| kirkland | type: boolean | 20:25 |
| kirkland | description: "kill switch for terminating all jobs" | 20:25 |
| kirkland | default: false | 20:25 |
| jose | another thingy there | 20:26 |
| kirkland | that way, you can set it to true, and then back to false, to re-run | 20:26 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, the loop could check for a stop file of some kind. That would only be written if a new config-changed was trying to do something | 20:26 |
| jose | mbruzek: would two config-changed's run at the same time? | 20:26 |
| kirkland | actually, that would work | 20:26 |
| mbruzek | jose, not sure... marcoceppi would know | 20:26 |
| jose | kirkland: problem with that boolean option is that config-get values don't change until the new run | 20:26 |
| jose | mbruzek: I believe not because juju is event based, and one event needs to finish for the other to run | 20:27 |
| jose | but let's wait for an answer :) | 20:27 |
| mbruzek | marcoceppi, will a new config-get run if the old one is still looping? | 20:27 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, this is kind of a big change, but could you fork the process to a script so the config-get exists immediately? | 20:28 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, once the charm gets all the information it needs, just call another bash script to do the dirty work? The loops in the new script could check for a stop flag | 20:29 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: is there an easy way for my charm to install a file? | 20:29 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: and a here-doc is not what I'm looking for | 20:29 |
| mbruzek | yes. | 20:29 |
| mbruzek | copy it from the charm directory | 20:30 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, I have created a files/ directory within the charm. | 20:30 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: okay -- I'm game for that | 20:30 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: can you give the the cp rune? | 20:30 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: an example of where I'm copying it from? | 20:30 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: or, rather, how to call it? it doesn't need to be copied | 20:31 |
| mbruzek | cp ${CHARM_HOME}/files/file.tar.gz /tmp/ | 20:31 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, you could just put another bash script in the hooks directory or charm root | 20:31 |
| mbruzek | source run_transcode_loop.sh arg1 arg2 arg3 | 20:32 |
| mbruzek | not source | 20:32 |
| mbruzek | my mistake | 20:32 |
| mbruzek | ./run_transcode_loop.sh would be in the charm dir | 20:32 |
| mbruzek | ./hooks/run_transcode_loop.sh | 20:32 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, is that what you are asking? | 20:33 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, ${CHARM_DIR} == cwd in a hook. | 20:34 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: yeah, I have the change; testing locally now | 20:34 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, I have a hp bootstrapped and ready to test next revision | 20:35 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: ack, let me put this through a quick local maas test | 20:35 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, yep | 20:35 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7858922/ | 20:35 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: maybe eyeball that for me? | 20:35 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, I have lots of other stuff to work on in the mean time. | 20:36 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, quick look over, I would suggest keeping the juju bits in the hook and just calling transcode with all the arguments that you compute in the hook. | 20:38 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, but as the author feel free to override me on that. | 20:39 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, I was thinking the transcode script could be juju free but perhaps that is too big of a change here. | 20:39 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: more like this? http://paste.ubuntu.com/7858971/ | 20:41 |
| mbruzek | yep | 20:41 |
| mbruzek | I am sure both will work. | 20:42 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: so I can just run ./transcode from within config-changed, if transcode is in the same dir as config-changed, right? | 20:52 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, no I believe the cwd is charm root | 20:53 |
| mbruzek | I believe the proper way is to type ./hooks/transcode | 20:53 |
| mbruzek | iirc | 20:53 |
| kirkland | doh | 20:55 |
| mbruzek | Did I mislead you Homer? | 20:55 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: I'm just confused about the cwd | 20:55 |
| mbruzek | OK | 20:56 |
| === scuttlemonkey is now known as scuttle|afk | ||
| mbruzek | Hey tvansteenburgh do you have a minute? | 21:04 |
| tvansteenburgh | yep | 21:05 |
| jose | kirkland: he means that the folder from which the scripts are ran is your charm root | 21:05 |
| jose | bare in mind that your scripts are in the hooks folder | 21:05 |
| kirkland | jose: right -- I'm curious about the cwd when a hook runs | 21:06 |
| tvansteenburgh | mbruzek: yeah what's up? | 21:06 |
| jose | it's /var/lib/juju/agents/unit-charmname-number/charm/ | 21:06 |
| jose | that is exported as a variable, called CHARM_DIR | 21:06 |
| jose | so every time you call $CHARM_DIR, it's taking you to that path | 21:06 |
| mbruzek | I am trying to deploy a bundle with a local reference to the charm do you remember what we decided worked? | 21:06 |
| tvansteenburgh | mbruzek: set the 'branch' key for the service | 21:07 |
| tvansteenburgh | (to the local path of the charm) | 21:07 |
| mbruzek | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7859181/ | 21:07 |
| mbruzek | I am getting a lot of key errors | 21:08 |
| mbruzek | but that is using charm: /home/ubuntu/charms/trusty/postgresql-psql | 21:08 |
| mbruzek | Will switch this to branch and try again | 21:08 |
| mbruzek | tvansteenburgh, We had this problem solved, I thought it was charm: /path/to/charm but I just tested it with branch. | 21:12 |
| mbruzek | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7859194/ | 21:12 |
| mbruzek | tvansteenburgh, Can you have a look and tell me where I am wrong? | 21:12 |
| mbruzek | same KeyError with branch as with charm | 21:13 |
| === sebas538_ is now known as sebas5384 | ||
| tvansteenburgh | mbruzek: do you still have your local amulet changes | 21:19 |
| mbruzek | tvansteenburgh, yes I believe so, but that is a good question, how can I verify? | 21:19 |
| tvansteenburgh | cd to amulet dir, run `git status` | 21:20 |
| kirkland | fuck | 21:20 |
| mbruzek | modified: amulet/deployer.py | 21:21 |
| kirkland | it's not working anymore | 21:21 |
| kirkland | http://paste.ubuntu.com/7859278/ | 21:21 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, looking | 21:21 |
| kirkland | seems the script just dies now inside of that while loop | 21:21 |
| kirkland | after the sleep | 21:21 |
| kirkland | disappears from ps | 21:21 |
| tvansteenburgh | mbruzek: `git diff` | 21:22 |
| mbruzek | tvansteenburgh, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7859281/ | 21:22 |
| tvansteenburgh | ok, those have already been added to upstream | 21:23 |
| kirkland | transcode/0 is currently doing the download, and that's going, but it seems to exit right after the wget | 21:23 |
| kirkland | transcode/1-N just all die inside of that while loop | 21:23 |
| kirkland | I'm at a loss for idea | 21:26 |
| kirkland | ideas | 21:26 |
| kirkland | I'm feeling at this point the charm store is more trouble than it's worth | 21:27 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, I am looking, trying to find what command is causing the hook to exit? | 21:39 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, could it be another config-changed event is coming by and killing this first transcode? | 21:40 |
| kirkland | mbruzek: that would be my best shot in the dark | 21:41 |
| mbruzek | kirkland, what is dying the transcode or the hook? | 21:41 |
| bloodearnest | is there a way to juju set a value to either a) and empty string or b) back to it's default value? | 22:02 |
| mbruzek | bloodearnest, does juju set charm key="" not work? | 22:06 |
| bloodearnest | mbruzek: nope | 22:06 |
| bloodearnest | nor = "''", = '""' or just = | 22:06 |
| bloodearnest | this is on 1.20 | 22:06 |
| bloodearnest | I should say, juju set charm setting='""' does work, but it sets the value to "" | 22:09 |
| mbruzek | bloodearnest, I was not aware that setting to empty string threw an exception | 22:11 |
| bloodearnest | mbruzek: yeah, that's new with 1.20 | 22:12 |
| mbruzek | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7859627/ | 22:13 |
| mbruzek | bloodearnest, You see a stack trace like that? | 22:13 |
| bloodearnest | mbruzek: I've been seeing quite a few panics, although not always fatal (as in, juju deploy x shows traceback, but the deploy has been kicked off) | 22:13 |
| bloodearnest | mbruzek: exactly | 22:14 |
| mbruzek | That should not be that way. you should ping in #juju-dev | 22:14 |
| bloodearnest | mbruzek: kk | 22:14 |
| mbruzek | bloodearnest, and open a bug against juju-core | 22:14 |
| mbruzek | It should not panic like that | 22:15 |
| bloodearnest | mbruzek: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1348829 | 22:22 |
| _mup_ | Bug #1348829: juju-core client panics with juju set empty string <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1348829> | 22:22 |
| === sarnold_ is now known as sarnold | ||
| === freeflying__ is now known as freeflying | ||
| === Beret- is now known as Beret | ||
| === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === cjohnston_ is now known as cjohnston | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!