[00:14] <bjf> mnaser, are you still there?
[00:14] <mnaser> yes hi bjf 
[00:14] <bjf> mnaser, yeah that one is hitting us hard
[00:15] <mnaser> bjf: http://puu.sh/apMOE/81afd2ddc9.png
[00:15] <mnaser> guess when i turned it off..
[00:15] <bjf> mnaser, here's the deal. we should be releasing 14.04.1 today and 12.04.5 on aug. 7
[00:16] <bjf> mnaser, we will have a kernel with the ksm fix built and ready to be released to updates on aug. 8
[00:16] <mnaser> bjf: that sounds awesome to hear, i'm on 12.04 with trusty lts enablement kernel
[00:16] <mnaser> so i'll be looking forward for that
[00:17] <bjf> mnaser, ok, we'll roll that out on the same day
[00:17] <bjf> mnaser, check with me next week. it might be in -proposed
[00:18] <mnaser> bjf: thank you so much for this, i will do so, i'm subscribed to the bug as well
[00:18] <mnaser> feel free to ping anytime here
[00:18] <bjf> mnaser, my plan right now is to upload it on tuesday
[00:18] <bjf> mnaser, it will take a little to work through the system and we can't impact the .5 release
[00:19] <mnaser> i understand that, disabling ksm was a life saver (not that much of a dependency on it)
[00:19] <mnaser> so i can live with it until then
[00:19] <bjf> ack
[00:19] <mnaser> anyways, gotta head out to gym, thanks for your time and info bjf :-)
[00:19] <bjf> np
[01:06] <pcarrier> hi! I can't fetch from git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-quantal.git: "fatal: remote error: access denied or repository not exported: /ubuntu/ubuntu-quantal.git"
[01:06] <pcarrier> any idea?
[01:31] <TJ-> pcarrier: yes; it has moved to the archive since it is EOL
[01:32] <pcarrier> TJ-: thanks! for reference, ubuntu-archive/ instead of ubuntu/
[01:33] <TJ-> pcarrier: Indeed :)
[10:18] <diwic> hi,
[10:18] <diwic> is there a macro like KERNEL_VERSION() that also includes the ubuntu version?
[10:18] <diwic> e g, if I want different code for 3.13.0-24 and 3.13.0-32
[10:31] <apw> diwic, in recent kernels there is an UBUNTU_something_ABI
[10:32] <diwic> apw, okay, so I'm looking for something like LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(3.13.0-24)
[10:33] <diwic> or -30 in this case
[10:33] <diwic> apw, can one do comparison >= on the UBUNTU_something_ABI symbol?
[10:42] <apw> diwic, it is just hte 24 in that case
[10:42] <apw> i guess one could do like 
[10:43] <apw> (LINUX_VERSION_CODE * 1000) + UBUNTU_SOMETHING_ABI >= KERNLE_VERSION(3.13.0) * 1000 + 24
[10:43] <ogra_> thats a french kernel ... 
[10:43] <ogra_> kern le 
[10:44] <ogra_> :)
[10:44] <diwic> le kern
[10:44] <apw> it is indeed
[10:44] <brendand> 'kern. le version 3.13'
[10:44] <diwic> apw, hmm, what's "something"? I thought it resolved to the version, like UBUNTU_24_ABI or something.
[10:46] <apw> #define UTS_UBUNTU_RELEASE_ABI $(abinum)
[10:46] <apw> no it is that
[10:47] <apw> i think you want like:
[10:48] <apw> #define UBUNTU_VERSION(a,b,c,d) ((KERNEL_VERSION((a),(b),(c)) * 1000) + (d))
[10:49] <apw> and use that
[10:49] <apw> and if you paired that with
[10:49] <apw> #ifndef UTS_UBUNTU_RELEASE_ABI
[10:49] <apw> #define UTS_UBUNTU_RELEASE_ABI 0
[10:49] <apw> #endif
[10:49] <apw> you could use it with normal code too
[10:49] <apw> normal versions
[10:50] <diwic> apw, ok, thanks!
[10:50] <apw> plus
[10:51] <apw> #define UBUNTU_VERSION_CODE ((KERNEL_VERSION_CODE * 1000) + UTS_UBUNTU_RELEASE_ABI)
[10:51] <apw> and i think you would have a winner
[10:51] <apw> it is possible some of these should come with the kernel as it were
[10:52] <diwic> yup, sounds like a nice improvement indeed if UBUNTU_VERSION and UBUNTU_VERSION_CODE were already there
[11:00] <apw> i'll poke rtg about it when he wakens
[15:26] <xevious> Will dmsetup remove flush any buffers for the device prior to removing it, or should sync be run manually? If I do need to sync manually, would `blockdev --flushbufs /dev/mapper/name` accomplish what I need? For reference, I'm concerned because of this: http://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2012-January/msg00082.html Has this been patched in recent versions of Device Mapper? If so, which version?
[16:07] <YoungSoo> hello
[22:53] <ProfessorKaos64> I saw the report that kernel 3.13.0-32 was released, but when I go to upgrade, it is held back. Is there a dependency I am missing?