[00:35] <zartoosh> HI I have mirrored ubuntu 14.04 trusty (main, universe,restricted, multiverse) locally. In my server sources.list I see: trusty-update and security what are those repos? thx
[00:35] <zartoosh> and where I can find them to mirror?
[00:37] <zartoosh> never mind I find them thanks
[07:57] <lordievader> Good morning.
[10:46] <blaaa> I have noticed a lot of available apparmor profiles are incomplete, currently I am looking at restricting managesieve
[10:47] <blaaa> unfortunately the profiling scripts for 14.04 are not working, so I need to do a lot manually
[10:48] <blaaa> the thing which I had never done is allow&restict a service to  create/use a socket, in the case of managesieve that is on port 4190
[10:48] <blaaa> should I just allow all inet stuff?
[13:46] <samba35> RoyK,hi
[13:47] <samba35> the problem which we discuss yeterday is fix ,there was a  problem with nic
[15:07] <RoyK> samba35: ah
[15:14] <DevDaemon> Hi Team, I am using ubuntu dekstop 12.04. Every thing is working fine but samba works in a sluggish way.
[15:15] <ikonia> then why are you not asking in #ubuntu
[15:15] <ikonia> instead of #ubuntu-server
[15:15] <samba35> hi
[15:16] <DevDaemon> fine, thanks
[15:24] <jrwren_> i'll bet since it is samba, they send him back here :]
[15:25] <samba35> i am faceing another problem with newly installed lt 14.04.1 ,i download iso and from 12.04 i use usb bootable and installed on new system but after installing system i have to keep usb on drive to boot i can boot if i remove usb stick , so how do i fix this issuse ?
[15:27] <cfhowlett> samba35 boot computer, change bios so your start from HDD, not USB
[15:27] <samba35> yes ,if i tryed to but even boot pri 1st to hdd it fail then it try to boot from network
[15:29] <TJ-> samba35: sounds as if then installation but the boot-loader on the USB, not the hard-disk
[15:30] <samba35> hi TJ- , strange but how do i fix this issuse
[15:31] <cfhowlett> !grub2|samba35 boot the USB and install grub2 to the HDD
[15:32] <samba35> thank , i am looking at
[15:35] <samba35> brb
[15:36] <samba35> rebooting but it give error grub-install: warning: File system `ext2' doesn't support embedding.   _____next line grub-install: warning: Embedding is not possible.  GRUB can only be installed in this setup by using blocklists.  However, blocklists are UNRELIABLE and their use is discouraged.. ____grub-install: error: will not proceed with blocklists.
[15:49] <saizai> Any ETA on when http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release-lts will get updated for 14.04.1?
[17:45] <sai> Hi, I am using https://github.com/ignited/laravel-pdf. However, I am getting error that says "Permission Denied". I am using ubuntu server
[18:53] <Pinkamena_D> Hey guys, having quite the issue today. I did a do-release-upgrade from 11 to 12.04 and now my server cant boot  with the 'gave up waiting for root device' error
[18:53] <Pinkamena_D> any suggestions to try first?
[18:54] <ikonia> look at what device it's starting to boot from
[18:54] <ikonia> that would be a good starter
[18:55] <Pinkamena_D> it uses UUID by default which means next to nothing to me
[18:55] <Pinkamena_D> I know it was a /dev/sda device
[18:56] <Pinkamena_D> so I tried putting the three there which I found in a list from the liveCD boot, but they all failed too
[18:56] <WACOMalt> Hey folks. I have an old outdated server, which unforunately is use for quite a few things (web host with EHCP, bittorrent sync box, ZNC bouncer, seedbox). It is running 10.04. I need to upgrade, preferably without breaking anything...
[18:56] <WACOMalt> What do you think the chance is that after a release upgrade that everything would work?
[18:56] <Pinkamena_D> seemingly not good from what just happened to me, but other people are likely more knowledgeable then I am.
[18:57] <ikonia> Pinkamena_D: so looking at what that UUID is would be a start
[18:57] <WACOMalt> what happened in your case Pinkamena_D ?
[18:57] <WACOMalt> oh sorry, I see
[18:57] <Pinkamena_D> wont boot past initramfs
[18:57] <ikonia> WACOMalt: it depends on a lot of things
[18:57] <ikonia> Pinkamena_D: I've old you what to check
[18:57] <ikonia> WACOMalt: do you have any PPA's or 3rd party repos ?
[18:58] <WACOMalt> very likely yes
[18:58] <Pinkamena_D> very well, I am not used to looking by UUID, how can I get to a non-busybox terminal from the liveCD?
[18:58] <ikonia> WACOMalt: have you checked the software you are using exiss has an upgrade in 12.04
[18:58] <ikonia> WACOMalt: then I think you will hit problems
[18:58] <ikonia> Pinkamena_D: check it within busybox
[18:58] <ikonia> Pinkamena_D: or boot from live media
[18:58] <WACOMalt> looks like EHCP has support for 14.04, but I dont know if there's an upgrade path
[18:59] <WACOMalt> I'm about to tell my partner to pull his stuff off and I'll start fresh
[18:59] <ikonia> you're not going to go from 10.04 -> 14.04
[18:59] <Pinkamena_D> live cd boots to gui setup, then alt+F1,2,3,4 goes to busybox. Busybox in the server from grub does not show and hard drives in /dev
[18:59] <Pinkamena_D> any*
[18:59] <ikonia> LongCatTH: why ar eyou doing alt+f1 ?
[18:59] <ikonia> oopps
[18:59] <ikonia> Pinkamena_D: why ar eyou doing alt+f1 ?
[19:00] <Pinkamena_D> because the server disk does not have a simple "drop to terminal" option
[19:00] <ikonia> Pinkamena_D: you just said it boots to a gui
[19:00] <Pinkamena_D> gui setup
[19:00] <ikonia> gui setup ???
[19:00] <ikonia> what gui setup
[19:00] <Pinkamena_D> the "resque system" option is also a setup, which I dont understand
[19:00] <ikonia> Pinkamena_D: if you don't know how to use the rescue shell - then you're probably out of your league
[19:00] <Pinkamena_D> not "gui" I guess, nots like ncurses, but you know what I mean
[19:01] <ikonia> Pinkamena_D: a.) use a desktop install going forward b.) boot a desktop CD - backup your data c.) re-install with the version you want
[19:01] <Pinkamena_D> when I choose "resque system" I get a "gui" setup step by step thing
[19:01] <Pinkamena_D> I WANT a shell
[19:01] <ikonia> Pinkamena_D: so go through the rescue setup
[19:02] <Pinkamena_D> I feel like that would erase most of the settings I have
[19:02] <ikonia> why do you feel that - it's live media
[19:02] <Pinkamena_D> its asking me to choose a partition
[19:02] <ikonia> it's not doing anything on your system
[19:02] <ikonia> yes, to launch a rescue shell in
[19:03] <Pinkamena_D> I will reboot and try to go further
[19:22] <jeffreylevesque_> Trying to install ubuntu server 14.04 do i select "Install", or "Install Ubuntu Server".  Which do i select?
[19:33] <miceiken> how do you scroll in screens?
[19:36] <RoyK> ctrl+a and then ctrl+u or ctrl+d
[19:43] <RoyK> miceiken: sorry - ctrl+a - <esc> - and then ctrl+u/ctrl+d
[20:19] <MrQuist> Hiya guys, terrible noob question here - my ISP has blocked outgoing port 25. (very usefull). i need to port forward my mailserver. Its currently listening on port 25, but can i make a "tunnel" from 225 to 25, whilst keeping 25 alive? This way i can use 225 from home and the rest of the world can just use 25.
[20:43] <Jeffrey_f> rsyslog question?  How to force past events, prior to setting up rsyslog?
[21:19] <Jeffrey_f> can someone answer an rsyslog question?
[21:40] <qman> MrQuist: you cannot host a public mail server without bidirectional port 25. You can submit mail to a mail server on the internet using an alternate port, like 587 which is specifically meant for mail submission.
[21:41] <MrQuist> qman, im not disabling port 25
[21:41] <MrQuist> i mean, locally, my own private home use ISP blocks port 25
[21:41] <MrQuist> my server has a working port 25
[21:41] <MrQuist> ofcourse
[21:41] <MrQuist> its bonkers to block port 25
[21:41] <MrQuist> but OK
[21:41] <qman> That prevents the possibility of hosting a public mail server.
[21:42] <MrQuist> so on my server i redirect port 225 to 25
[21:42] <MrQuist> and 25 will still work ofcourse
[21:42] <qman> And no, it isn't, that's common practice to prevent spambots
[21:42] <MrQuist> qman, indeed.
[21:42] <MrQuist> and i think its bonkers
[21:42] <MrQuist> i connect to my mail server using port 25.
[21:42] <qman> If you want to host mail, you have to pay for a business account where it isn't blocked
[21:42] <MrQuist> I not can't. I think its bonkers. At least let me have an option to disable the blocking
[21:43] <MrQuist> im paying for internet
[21:43] <MrQuist> im not paying for certain ports on the internet :P
[21:43] <qman> Actually you are, should read your contract
[21:44] <MrQuist> yes, it states they block certain ports to prevent bots / spam / all kinds of crap
[21:44] <MrQuist> but
[21:44] <MrQuist> *wait for it*
[21:44] <MrQuist> i think its bonkers
[21:44] <qman> 25 is meant for server to server mail delivery, 587 is meant for mail submission by clients
[21:44] <MrQuist> meh
[21:44] <qman> Hosting a mail server isn't normal end user activity, so its blocked on residential accounts to prevent abuse
[21:45] <MrQuist> Okay
[21:45] <qman> Your isp should offer a plan where it isn't, usually for more money and with other benefits like static ips
[21:45] <MrQuist> i have a static IP
[21:45] <MrQuist> but its just annoying
[21:46] <MrQuist> its the only ISP in the netherlands that blocks port 25.
[21:47] <qman> ISPs also usually block netbios and SMB for similar reasons
[21:48] <MrQuist> i get it that they block _incoming_ port 25 stuff
[21:49] <MrQuist> its just crappy
[21:49] <MrQuist> as i use port 25 for MSA
[21:49] <MrQuist> instead of 587
[21:49] <qman> Outgoing is the problem, not incoming
[21:49] <qman> People pick up viruses and become spambots, unknowingly
[21:50] <MrQuist> you mean they have a service running connecting to PCś around the world on port 25 and spamming them with HELO i got dem messages
[21:50] <qman> So they set a bar where you should know better or are at least financially committed to know better, before unblocking it
[21:51] <MrQuist> My thunderbird uses port 225 now.
[21:51] <MrQuist> It works
[21:51] <MrQuist> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 225 -j REDIRECT --to-port 25
[21:51] <MrQuist> on my mailserver
[21:51] <qman> No, PCs around the world get infected, then connect to public mail servers on 25, sending spam
[21:51] <MrQuist> thats what i said right
[21:51] <MrQuist> nevermind i used the word PC instead of server
[21:52] <qman> That's why outgoing 25 is blocked, they don't want your pc connecting to public mail servers on 25
[21:52] <qman> Public mail services normally accept client mail (thunderbird) on 587
[21:54] <qman> The reason for this is, 25 is usually anonymous, while 587 usually requires a login
[21:56] <qman> You can use any port you want for mail submission (587) as long as your clients know what it is, but for public mail delivery, only 25 will work because that's the standard and what everyone else uses
[23:23] <Jeffrey_f> I have rsyslog running to a syslog server, setup today.  I want previous logs (syslog.1 for example) to get into the server too.........How can I do that?