[08:11] <dandrader> tsdgeos, so what qt version will have that garbage collector fix? 5.3.2?
[08:13] <tsdgeos> dandrader: yep
[08:14] <tsdgeos> dandrader: note that we already have a less good but working behaviour
[08:14] <mhr3> tsdgeos, hey, do you know if there's an eta on the scoeps overview? we'll need to deploy changes to the server, so need at least some sync there
[08:14] <dandrader> tsdgeos, your patch, I know
[08:14] <tsdgeos> mhr3: eta as in when it will be ready or when it has to be ready?
[08:14] <mhr3> tsdgeos, eta on when will it appear in an image
[08:16] <tsdgeos> mhr3: someone needs to review it
[08:16] <tsdgeos> at least in my side noone has looked at the code
[08:16] <tsdgeos> Saviq: ↑↑↑↑
[08:23] <tsdgeos> mhr3: the merging of scopes-v3 is out of question?
[08:23] <mhr3> tsdgeos, still didn't get a silo
[08:23] <tsdgeos> seems we are traincon'ed or something
[08:23] <mhr3> probably cause of some other u8 branches
[08:24] <mhr3> or that
[08:29] <tsdgeos> dandrader: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtdeclarative-opensource-src/+bug/1349297 in case you're interested
[08:29] <tsdgeos> anyone knows where's Mirv?
[08:30] <tsdgeos> Saviq: ↑ ?
[09:33] <paulliu> tsdgeos: I've just pushed a fix to the attribute UI to fix the Reference Error on "Art, Summary". make xvfbtestCard successed now.
[09:33] <sil2100> Saviq: hi! So, many people noticed that on the latest images the power dialog appears a bit too frequently, sometimes not respecting the 3-second hold time
[09:34] <sil2100> Saviq: davmor2 is filling in a bug for that, and he marked it as a promotion blocker
[09:34] <sil2100> Saviq: the menu seems to appear sometimes after just unlocking the screen
[09:34] <sil2100> Saviq: could you have someone looking at that maybe? :)
[09:35] <Saviq> sil2100, yeah, we just talked about this, it's tricky to reproduce though
[09:35] <Saviq> sil2100, a bug would be nice
[09:36] <davmor2> Saviq: it'll come I have a few issues to file though I'll ping you with the bug number
[09:37] <Saviq> davmor2, thanks, we have an idea fortunately
[09:37] <tsdgeos> paulliu: ok
[09:45] <mzanetti> anyone up for a simple review? https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity8/launcher-new-count-emblem/+merge/226998
[09:47] <mzanetti> elopio: hey, I've prepared everything, please let me know when you're up/ready for the dash-as-app stuff
[09:53] <tsdgeos> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
[09:53] <tsdgeos> tests/qmltests/CMakeFiles/xvfbtestDashContent.dir/build.make:52: recipe for target 'tests/qmltests/CMakeFiles/xvfbtestDashContent' failed
[09:53] <tsdgeos> not cool
[09:55]  * tsdgeos does the magic gdb while call to try to get a backtrace
[10:02] <dandrader> tsdgeos, do you think all this stuff is still valid with current qt? www.kdab.com/qml-engine-internals-part-3-binding-types/
[10:03] <tsdgeos> dandrader: not sure tbh
[10:03] <tsdgeos> seems on the verge of "is it written with the future v4 code in mind or still using old code"
[10:04] <tsdgeos> dandrader: thomas irc's frequently we can always ask him
[10:09] <tsdgeos> not very useful :/ http://paste.ubuntu.com/7883410/
[10:09] <tsdgeos> let's see valgrind
[10:39] <facundobatista> Hola!
[10:47] <Saviq> o/
[10:59] <mzanetti> tsdgeos: what's your opinion on my comment here? https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/showSearchOnSearchQueryChange/+merge/228454
[11:00] <mzanetti> not sure if we even should change it... just noticed it as being a little weird
[11:01] <mzanetti> maybe changing it would be even worse
[11:01] <tsdgeos> mzanetti: yeah, back is not really back but hide search
[11:01] <tsdgeos> agreed it is kind of a bit confusing
[11:02] <mzanetti> I mean, if you trigger search manually, the back button hiding it seems just fine
[11:02] <mzanetti> but if the search is triggered automatically, its a bit... huh?
[11:03] <tsdgeos> Saviq: if you have mike around can you ask him about it? it = "Search in apps scope, click on store card, end up in the store scope with the saerch already typed in (doesn't work now, i fixed that), problem now is that first back will hide serach and only next back goes back to original scope"
[11:07] <Saviq> tsdgeos, will do
[11:08] <Saviq> tsdgeos, actually
[11:09] <Saviq> tsdgeos, since we discussed "search is a separate scope page"
[11:09] <Saviq> tsdgeos, that'd solve that
[11:10] <tsdgeos> right
[11:10] <tsdgeos> but it all depends on when you do what
[11:10] <tsdgeos> i've already a branch to fix the "you end up in a scope with search but you can't see the search"
[11:10] <tsdgeos> while the other is a bit more of work
[11:14] <tsdgeos> Saviq: ↑
[11:16] <Saviq> tsdgeos, sure, so just ignore the oddity for now
[11:16] <tsdgeos> oki
[11:17] <Saviq> tsdgeos, btw added a task for you, pstolowski's favourite: "scope (scope:///) links should activate directly and not allow previews other than in dash overview All category [ui]"
[11:17] <tsdgeos> not sure i understand whta it means :D
[11:19] <Saviq> tsdgeos, whenever we encounter a result with scope:/// uri
[11:19] <Saviq> tsdgeos, we activagte it on tap and ignore long press (except for All in overview)
[11:20] <tsdgeos> ok
[11:20] <tsdgeos> do we have an example of where that is happening and should not?
[11:21] <tsdgeos> pstolowski: ↑
[11:21] <pstolowski> tsdgeos, one example, although for preview case only is 'Ubuntu store' result in Apps
[11:21] <mhr3> tsdgeos, remove the if (scope.id == "clickscope") hack and it will be everywhere :)
[11:21] <pstolowski> :D
[11:22] <tsdgeos> ok
[11:25] <Saviq> mhr3, yeah yeah, not so simple ;)
[11:26] <Saviq> tsdgeos, did we ever try longpress for preview in the overview anyway?
[11:26] <mhr3> i did
[11:26] <tsdgeos> it work-ish
[11:26] <tsdgeos> shows things
[11:26] <tsdgeos> :D
[11:26] <mhr3> doesn't work in favourites
[11:27] <mhr3> but that's by design iirc
[11:27] <tsdgeos> yeah i think i have code to ignore it
[11:39] <tsdgeos> paulliu: remove this "// TODO: we should get num of attributes from components" ?
[11:44] <cimi> http://www.moosoinc.com/Cimi-X8-Quad-Core-15GHz-Android-Tablet-Pad-PC-WIFI-16GB-_p_61.html
[11:58] <paulliu> tsdgeos: ok
[12:53] <Saviq> paulliu, http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5/qml-qtquick-keyevent.html#isAutoRepeat-prop
[13:23] <Saviq> paulliu, bug #1349416
[13:23] <Saviq> greyback, dandrader ↑
[13:44] <kgunn> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1349362
[13:45] <kgunn> davmor2: ^ just to confirm, i heard from others, you can simply press cancel to continue, e.g. it doesn't freeze or become unusable ?
[13:47] <davmor2> kgunn: yes you can hit cancel, but it is ugly if you are trying to answer a call stop and alarm etc and it pops up which makes it a regression over the last image and user facing :)
[14:00] <davmor2> kgunn: Saviq asked me to test silo 006 and with that in place I can't reproduce the issue anyway but it could be related if there is an issue in spurious power button signals too
[14:01] <davmor2> kgunn: also I was told that blockers had to be high or critical, Only reason I marked it high is because you could hit cancel to get out of it, it just isn't pretty
[14:03] <kgunn> davmor2: ack...i think we should just change policy on blocker/critical...e.g. if its blocking how is it _not_ critical :-P
[14:04] <davmor2> kgunn: true I guess
[14:07] <Saviq> paulliu, bug #1349362
[14:39] <elopio> mzanetti: ping. I'm here. Is there a PPA to get it installed?
[14:40] <Saviq> elopio, silo 6 probably
[14:40] <Saviq> elopio, oh no, you mean dash as app?
[14:40] <Saviq> elopio, https://launchpad.net/~unity-team/+archive/phone-right-edge then
[14:40] <elopio> Saviq: yes, that.
[14:40] <elopio> thanks.
[14:42] <mzanetti> elopio: yes, that's the one
[14:49] <mzanetti> cimi: what emblems were you talking about in the standup?
[14:50] <cimi> mzanetti, card emblems
[14:50] <tsdgeos> Saviq: so for forcing the art shape size you want 'if ( scope.id == "clickscope" && categoryId != "store" ) {' or 'if ( scope.id == "clickscope" && categoryId == "bla" || categoryId  == 'lolo' ) {' ?
[14:50] <mzanetti> cimi: ah, great. Speaking of emblems, mind doing this one? https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity8/launcher-new-count-emblem/+merge/226998
[14:50] <mzanetti> cimi:  you might even copy code if design matches
[14:50] <cimi> mzanetti, approfittatore
[14:51] <Saviq> tsdgeos, the latter
[14:51] <Saviq> tsdgeos, explicit
[14:51] <mzanetti> cimi: :P
[14:51] <tsdgeos> ok
[14:51] <tsdgeos> need to find out the two names then .D
[14:52] <tsdgeos> "predefined" and "local"
[14:56] <Saviq> tsdgeos, sounds about right
[15:11] <tsdgeos> Saviq: https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/clickScopeForceArtShapeSize/+merge/228505 for the fixed art shape size
[15:14] <Saviq> tsdgeos, awesomes
[15:14]  * tsdgeos gets on the scopes preview activate thing
[15:17] <Saviq> tsdgeos, tx
[15:17] <mhr3> Saviq, tsdgeos, shouldn't the store icons be like that too?
[15:17] <Saviq> mhr3, no
[15:17] <Saviq> mhr3, they're full-width
[15:17] <mhr3> hmm, weird
[15:17] <Saviq> mhr3, and aspect ratio as defined by the scope
[15:17] <mhr3> but ok
[15:17] <Saviq> mhr3, per-design, too
[15:17] <Saviq> ↑
[15:17] <Saviq> look, he ran away
[15:17] <mhr3> typical
[15:17] <mhr3> :P
[16:22] <cimi> pete-woods, hey pete, what is the status of the infographics?
[16:26] <pete-woods> cimi: hi! basically I've done nothing to the libusermetrics codebase in maybe a month or two
[16:26] <pete-woods> not since I reworked the output API for you
[16:27] <cimi> pete-woods, did you test the unity branch?
[16:27] <pete-woods> it could do with a code review (I have a reviewer organised)
[16:27] <pete-woods> cimi: I did last time you asked, and it worked back then
[16:27] <pete-woods> cimi: the remaining item seems to be what to do when there's no data
[16:27] <pete-woods> and who should handle that
[16:28] <cimi> can you get your branch reviewed soon?
[16:28] <pete-woods> whichever of us does the "programming", I'd say a designer should make us a pretty svg
[16:28] <pete-woods> cimi: that's going to happen tomorrow morning
[16:28] <cimi> cool
[16:42] <mzanetti> elopio: hey
[16:42] <elopio> mzanetti: hello
[16:42] <mzanetti> elopio: I've change the location of the branch to https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/dash-as-app/+merge/228534
[16:42] <mzanetti> elopio: just to make sure other people can write to it when I'm on vacation
[16:43] <elopio> mzanetti: ok, thanks. I haven't finished my morning meetings, so I haven't touched it yet.
[16:43] <elopio> but I'll start soon.
[16:43] <mzanetti> elopio: cool. I'll be here tomorrow whole day still if you have questions
[16:44] <elopio> mzanetti: I'll send you an email before EOD.
[16:44] <mzanetti> cool
[16:44] <mzanetti> elopio: you can try pinging me in irc too
[16:44] <mzanetti> whatever is easier for you
[16:45] <elopio> ok
[17:13] <Saviq> mzanetti, btw instead of disapprove / reject you could have just resubmitted
[17:14] <mzanetti> Saviq: does that work for a different source branch too?
[17:15]  * mzanetti thought that only works different target branches
[17:20] <Saviq> mzanetti, nope, you can change the whole thing
[17:20] <mzanetti> ok. thanks for the hint. next time
[17:51] <Saviq> mterry, http://people.canonical.com/~msawicz/touch-meta.tar
[17:51] <Saviq> mterry, ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/landing-006