| msitarz | Hi | 06:03 |
|---|---|---|
| msitarz | could somebody tell me how does cloud-init decide which network interface to configure? | 06:04 |
| === evilissimo|afk is now known as evilissimo | ||
| harmw | smoser: ifup $interface | 07:36 |
| harmw | damn | 07:36 |
| harmw | ok, Ill make some adjustments | 07:36 |
| harmw | udhcpc will put the interface where it's gotten an address on in the environment, yes, as $interface | 07:37 |
| harmw | and disabling would be done in /etc/networking/interfaces, so no need for a DISABLED (which Ill remove) | 07:38 |
| msitarz | harmw: is that related to my question ? | 08:29 |
| harmw | haha no, sorry :) | 08:32 |
| harmw | I should've bzr copied the default.script btw, since now it looks like cirros-dhcpc is completely new - which it obviously isn't | 08:56 |
| harmw | anyway, smoser , the merge request is updated | 08:57 |
| smoser | msitarz, it doesn't. | 12:46 |
| smoser | system configuration tells it. | 12:46 |
| smoser | on ubuntu, it blocks on anything 'auto' in /etc/network/interfaces. | 12:47 |
| msitarz | smoser: so cloud-init does not setup the network | 13:17 |
| msitarz | but the default OS configuration is just setup to use DHCP , that's why I get IP on eth0 ? | 13:17 |
| smoser | right. | 13:18 |
| smoser | thats how i would think things should work | 13:18 |
| smoser | eth0 should be expected to come up on dhcp and give route to network | 13:18 |
| smoser | now... | 13:18 |
| smoser | that is being fixedui do want to fix that htough | 13:18 |
| smoser | so that ocnfig drive can correctly insert networking | 13:18 |
| === evilissimo is now known as evilissimo|afk | ||
| harlowja_at_home | smoser, btw, i'm in NY for a couple week, so will be on/off (forgot if i told u :-P) | 16:21 |
| smoser | harlowja_at_home, sure. just make sure you vote for my talk. :) | 16:24 |
| harlowja_at_home | ?? | 16:24 |
| harlowja_at_home | where's that | 16:25 |
| smoser | http://www.openstack.org/vote-paris/Presentation/ecure-containers-in-openstack-using-lxc-and-user-namespaces | 16:25 |
| smoser | and while you're there, you should vote for this one too | 16:25 |
| smoser | https://www.openstack.org/vote-paris/Presentation/astrologer | 16:25 |
| harlowja_at_home | cool | 16:26 |
| harlowja_at_home | will do, will get some others to vote for that also :-P | 16:26 |
| smoser | others by canonical at http://insights.ubuntu.com/2014/07/31/voting-begins-for-openstack-summit-sessions-in-paris/ | 16:26 |
| smoser | look at that second link :) | 16:26 |
| smoser | if you have links to yours, i'll + them to | 16:26 |
| harlowja_at_home | "highly effective astrological love problem solutions are good enough to solve all your problems - See more at: https://www.openstack.org/vote-paris/Presentation/astrologer#sthash.Gu4vFXan.dpuf"? | 16:26 |
| harlowja_at_home | what the | 16:26 |
| harlowja_at_home | i didn't put any up this time :-P | 16:27 |
| harlowja_at_home | smoser, astrogger even put it under the networking category +1, ha | 16:49 |
| harlowja_at_home | different type of networking, ha | 16:49 |
| harmw | smoser: ready to accept my merge request? :P | 18:35 |
| smoser | let me look. i think we were closer. | 18:36 |
| smoser | so the patch to busybox | 18:37 |
| smoser | you patch in a patch. is that right ? | 18:37 |
| smoser | is thats what happening there? | 18:37 |
| smoser | where does leasetime come from, do you know ? | 18:37 |
| smoser | ie, is it of any use for us to get that passed in from ifup ? | 18:37 |
| smoser | i dont know where it would get it from | 18:37 |
| smoser | harmw, do you mind if i bikeshed on some things? | 18:40 |
| smoser | i dont want to put you off, and i thikn its probably good enough. | 18:40 |
| smoser | but a few things. | 18:40 |
| smoser | here. i'll just make some changes here | 18:42 |
| smoser | and then propose for merge into your branch | 18:42 |
| smoser | then you sanity check | 18:42 |
| harmw | leasetime comes from the dhcpservice, we don't do anything with it | 18:46 |
| smoser | hm.. | 18:46 |
| smoser | i'd have thoguht so | 18:46 |
| smoser | but why does ifup have '%leastime%' ? | 18:46 |
| smoser | see line 37 of your MP. | 18:47 |
| harmw | hm, it does? | 18:47 |
| smoser | see how it can call dhcpcd with '-l %leasetime' | 18:47 |
| smoser | it seems odd | 18:47 |
| smoser | but i didn't understand. so asking you | 18:47 |
| smoser | :) | 18:47 |
| harmw | hmk, well, not all clients are using the same options though | 18:47 |
| harmw | in ifupdown.c | 18:47 |
| harmw | and yes, its a patch that creates a new (patch) file that will add the new dhcp client directive to that struct in ifupdown.c | 18:49 |
| harmw | whats so wrong with my stuff for you to b wanting to bikeshed? :p | 18:49 |
| smoser | give me 10 minutes. i'll push up a branch. | 18:51 |
| harmw | meh | 18:51 |
| smoser | just making stuff more localized and such. | 18:52 |
| smoser | i'll show | 18:52 |
| smoser | nothing big | 18:52 |
| smoser | you really did good. | 18:52 |
| smoser | thank you! | 18:52 |
| harmw | yea right, well obviously not good enough | 18:52 |
| harmw | :p | 18:52 |
| smoser | harmw, what is -x | 18:55 |
| harmw | as in the udhcpc parameter ? | 18:56 |
| smoser | yeah | 18:56 |
| harmw | asking for options | 18:56 |
| harmw | no | 18:56 |
| harmw | 'include option OPT in set packets' | 18:56 |
| smoser | ok. so if hostname is empty | 18:56 |
| smoser | then we dont want the -x either | 18:56 |
| smoser | right ? | 18:56 |
| harmw | damn, well... isn't hostname defaulting to cirros? | 18:57 |
| smoser | probably. but just in case. | 18:57 |
| harmw | god I hate you for that :p | 18:57 |
| smoser | i told you bike shed | 18:57 |
| harmw | you're probably right | 18:57 |
| smoser | i've got it thoguh | 18:57 |
| harmw | probably something like: [ -z `hostname` ] && OPT=bla | 18:58 |
| harmw | you should merge the updated buildroot as well, someday | 19:01 |
| smoser | yes. | 19:01 |
| smoser | i will merge that for sure. | 19:01 |
| harmw | but lets finish this udhcpc branch first, then you're all set on the buildroot, and then its time to drink beers and enjoy the weekend :> | 19:02 |
| smoser | harmw, so every time something ifup dhcps | 19:15 |
| smoser | it will kill resolv.conf | 19:15 |
| smoser | ie, last one wins | 19:15 |
| harmw | but thats not any different from the current situation, right? | 19:16 |
| smoser | i dont know. | 19:16 |
| smoser | problby not | 19:16 |
| smoser | just found it interesting | 19:16 |
| smoser | and odd | 19:16 |
| smoser | i'm gonna make it only do that if | 19:16 |
| smoser | domain or dns is set. | 19:16 |
| harmw | that part was already in default.script, which is called at ifup | 19:16 |
| smoser | alright. | 19:16 |
| smoser | i'll lave it as it is | 19:16 |
| harmw | probably wouln't hurt, no | 19:16 |
| smoser | we could potentially make that work | 19:16 |
| smoser | make it configurable | 19:17 |
| smoser | we could | 19:17 |
| harmw | i'd opt for first bringing in the major changes, and then perhaps clean this little issue :) | 19:18 |
| harmw | *fix | 19:18 |
| harmw | grrr, why doesn't centos7 ship with cloud-init | 19:25 |
| harmw | I thought RH had added that to RHEL | 19:25 |
| harmw | and while the releasenotes of centos7 mention there are cloud images underway, they have yet to arrive | 19:25 |
| smoser | harmw, lp:~smoser/cirros/udhcpc-wrapper | 19:29 |
| smoser | i'll be back in a bit | 19:29 |
| harmw | ok, ill have a look at merging that with my branch | 19:29 |
| harmw | done, pushed | 19:43 |
| harmw | ok, I'm building a new image now | 19:45 |
| harmw | hm, I dont see any reason for it to fail on the current buildroot - but I'm using my 2014 buildroot to testdrive this thing... (since that builds on centos) | 19:46 |
| harmw | ill check back in an hour :) | 19:46 |
| harmw | and another hour :p | 20:35 |
| harmw | so, busybox 1.20.1 in buildroot 2014 :| damn | 20:35 |
| smoser | yeah. thats kindof annoying. | 20:35 |
| smoser | lets get to a new buildroot | 20:36 |
| harmw | haha cool | 20:36 |
| harmw | make it happen | 20:36 |
| harmw | :) | 20:36 |
| smoser | i dont have an easy answer for that patch having to have the busybox verison in it | 20:36 |
| smoser | (that is annoying) | 20:36 |
| harmw | I had the exact same objection to it | 20:36 |
| harmw | but went for it nonetheless | 20:36 |
| harmw | anyway, ill be back in 60 minutes | 20:37 |
| smoser | k | 20:37 |
| smoser | so lets shoot to merge to your 2014.02 | 20:37 |
| smoser | and then merge to 2014.5 | 20:37 |
| harmw | (and lets not forget udhcpc) | 20:37 |
| smoser | right. | 20:38 |
| smoser | holy moley. theres a bunch there. | 20:41 |
| smoser | harmw, ok. i hope id ont break anything. but heres my plan. | 20:54 |
| smoser | a.) take the udhcp sutff without the patch disabled in the series file | 20:54 |
| smoser | so that it will still build fine, but will be inert | 20:55 |
| smoser | b.) get us merged to a newer version and address that later. | 20:55 |
| smoser | harmw, ok. pulled iwthout patch. | 21:03 |
| harmw | uhm, then you shouldn't have deleted default.script right? | 21:25 |
| harmw | since now we're not applying the patch to bb (to make it default to using cirros-dhcpc) it'll start udhcpc just like it always did | 21:26 |
| harmw | and that will be done with -s /usr/share/udhcpc/default.script | 21:27 |
| harmw | which doesn't exists | 21:27 |
| harmw | so please revert that file untill we will use the patch | 21:27 |
| harmw | thanks for merging though :) | 21:27 |
| harmw | be sure to update the chngelog btw | 21:28 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!