| wxl | hopefully this is not too late but i just marked lubuntu alternate amd64/i386 as ready for alpha2 | 03:06 |
|---|---|---|
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| pitti | infinity: I just uploaded an SRU for bitcoin in precise; any idea why it landed in NEW? | 06:21 |
| pitti | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue?queue_state=0 | 06:21 |
| pitti | wgrant: ^ | 06:21 |
| pitti | bitcoin | 0.3.24~dfsg-1 | precise/universe | source | 06:21 |
| pitti | bitcoind | 0.3.24~dfsg-1 | precise/universe | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, powerpc | 06:21 |
| pitti | is that because it doesn't exist in any other release? | 06:21 |
| pitti | but I suppose accepting it in NEW won't put it into UNAPPROVED, like that it's just not visible to the SRU team | 06:22 |
| wgrant | pitti: Totally new override code was deployed a few hours ago, so probably a regression there. Investigating now -- please don't touch it just yet. | 06:23 |
| pitti | wgrant: thanks; no, I won't -- if I would accept it it would already go into -proposed, and I'm not in ~ubuntu-sru any more | 06:23 |
| infinity | Definitely a regression. | 06:25 |
| infinity | wgrant: HEY, YOUR CODE HAS A REGRESSION. | 06:25 |
| infinity | wgrant: YOU WANTED ME TO TELL YOU. | 06:25 |
| infinity | wgrant: THIS IS ME NOTICING. | 06:25 |
| wgrant | Ahh | 06:26 |
| wgrant | It's the resurrections-must-hit-NEW case going wrong. | 06:26 |
| wgrant | The most recent precise pub is a rejected SRU that is now Deleted. | 06:27 |
| wgrant | So it sees the most recent pub is Deleted and decides it needs NEWing again. | 06:27 |
| wgrant | I guess in this case I should look for non-Deleted ones first. | 06:27 |
| wgrant | infinity: Opinions on precedence for binaries? We need to fall back to other archs and also to deleted pubs, but in which order should the combinations be tried? | 06:32 |
| wgrant | Like, should an amd64 binary fall back to i386's overrides before a deleted amd64 pub? | 06:33 |
| pitti | I think "yes", from my POV | 06:34 |
| pitti | in general it's really awkward to have builds for different arches be in different components | 06:34 |
| pitti | and I'm inclined to say that every such case is queue pilot error instead of deliberate | 06:34 |
| infinity | wgrant: arch-before-deleted, I'd say. Since arches should match in the Ubuntu case anyway. | 06:35 |
| infinity | wgrant: We don't tend to mismatch. | 06:35 |
| infinity | wgrant: We *can*, but we don't, cause it breaks our tiny little AA minds (and some of our tools). | 06:35 |
| infinity | We should probably revisit that some day, so we can do different arch priorities, but yeah, we don't today. Today, we override the tools instead of the pubs. | 06:36 |
| wgrant | infinity: That's where I was leaning to as well, yeah. | 06:36 |
| wgrant | The only thing that can sanely differ is priority, I guess. | 06:37 |
| wgrant | And who cares if that goes slightly wrong. | 06:37 |
| Riddell | Laney: did alpha 2 get released? I see nothing on ubuntu-devel-announce? | 07:17 |
| Laney | Riddell: no, kylin hadn't readied before I had to leave | 08:15 |
| Laney | let me check on it now | 08:15 |
| Laney | yes, looks good, doing it | 08:16 |
| Riddell | gotcha | 08:20 |
| === popey_ is now known as popey | ||
| Laney | jamespage: do you know if anyone other than utlemming can publish cloud images? | 08:32 |
| jamespage | Laney, rcj can as well but they are both not around until later | 08:32 |
| jamespage | Laney, prob smoser as well | 08:33 |
| Laney | ha | 08:33 |
| jamespage | again +3 hrs or so | 08:33 |
| Laney | sure, don't really want to wait for that | 08:33 |
| Laney | I'll just say "will shortly be available" | 08:33 |
| Laney | syncing out now | 08:37 |
| jamespage | Laney, ack | 08:41 |
| Laney | jamespage: ah, maybe they're already done: http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/utopic/alpha-2/ | 09:02 |
| jamespage | Laney, awesome | 09:08 |
| jamespage | that does look to be the case | 09:09 |
| Laney | so all good | 09:09 |
| Laney | move along people, nothing to see here | 09:09 |
| === Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Trusty Final, Utopic Alpha 2 | Archive: Open | Utopic Release Coordination. Please don't upload things during freezes where you shouldn't, or be prepared to apologise to the release team | We accept payment in cash, check or beer | melior malum quod cognoscis | ||
| pitti | the new debhelper is being held back in -proposed by the new broken gem2deb version in -proposed, but it's not the new debhelper's fault; can you please hint this? | 09:22 |
| === vila is now known as vila-lunch | ||
| === vila-lunch is now known as vila | ||
| smoser | Laney, i can. | 12:48 |
| smoser | and, yeah, rcj. | 12:49 |
| Laney | smoser: It'd be good to have someone in the eu who can do it too | 13:32 |
| smoser | Laney, talk to utlemming to get someone on that team. | 13:33 |
| Laney | utlemming: consider yourself talked to :-) | 13:34 |
| Chipaca | seb128: please re-review https://code.launchpad.net/~chipaca/gsettings-ubuntu-touch-schemas/just-the-touch-settings/+merge/228317 | 14:31 |
| === barry` is now known as barry_ | ||
| === barry_ is now known as barry | ||
| seb128 | Chipaca, k | 14:45 |
| === gaughen_ is now known as gaughen | ||
| Nivex | Curiosity is getting the better of me. What's the blocker for do-release-upgrade from 12.04.4 to 14.04.1 ? | 15:12 |
| wgrant | pitti, infinity: That NEW bug is fixed on prod now. | 15:58 |
| utlemming | Laney: working on that question today, incidently. | 17:14 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!