[00:41] <zartoosh> jaawerth we have no wifi on our system.
[00:57] <fridaynext> when i do 'df -h /media/raid', it shows 5.5T size, even though it should be 6T.  But fdisk -l shows 6000GB.  Any ideas why this would happen?
[00:58] <sarnold> 6000000000000 / (1024 * 1024 * 1024)
[00:58] <sarnold> 5587.93544769287109375000
[00:59] <fridaynext> sarnold: ah man, now i feel like an idiot
[01:00] <fridaynext> sarnold: thank you
[01:00] <sarnold> fridaynext: just so long as you've got the right order of magnitude, everything else seems to just take care of itself :)
[01:21] <BSODInTheSky> I got banned from the normal one for having to go to the bathroom
[01:23] <BSODInTheSky> No one is talking. Goodbye!
[08:46] <Abhijit> is it possible to do sample.mysite.com/A/ to first vps and sample.mysite.com/B/ to another vps?
[09:02] <ikonia> arpu: sure
[09:02] <ikonia> ops
[09:02] <ikonia> Abhijit: sure
[09:03] <Abhijit> :-)
[09:17] <lordievader> Good morning.
[09:52] <psih0man> hello! I have a problem with fsck.ext3 on a large partition (12T): after running for a while, the system sent the process SIGSTOP. the system has 48 GB RAM, of which the fsck process created 32 GB of buffers. SIGCONT does not resume execution. how can one go about checking such a large partition? is it safe to kill the fsck process?
[09:56] <bekks> The system shouldnt send SIGSTOP to the fsck. Did you run out of memory?
[09:57] <psih0man> no I didn't. there are about 7 GB free
[09:58] <psih0man> the systems is running on ubuntu 14.04
[09:59] <psih0man> here is the ps output: root      1848 22.2  0.4 262256 243328 pts/3   T    12:11  10:29 fsck.ext3 /dev/mapper/36a4badb0003f2dba000007ed4c6c164d-part1
[10:00] <psih0man> no one else is using the system and no other daemons are running
[10:04] <rbasak> psih0man: are you running it in the background somehow?
[10:05] <rbasak> psih0man: if so, are you sure that it hasn't just stopped because it's prompting the console?
[10:06] <psih0man> rbasak: you're correct. I just noticed that it displayed a Fix<y>? prompt while running in background
[10:06] <psih0man> now I need to figure out how to send the resposes
[10:07] <psih0man> I will bring it into the foreground
[10:07] <psih0man> thank you for help!
[10:11] <rbasak> No problem
[12:07] <smaboshe> Hello!
[12:22] <smaboshe> I'm having trouble running "sudo do-release-upgrade". Is the "en_ZM" locale not supported for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS? - https://gist.github.com/smaboshe/d51b102d8a678e0b98e2
[13:38] <sync0pate> halp! I'm locked out of my VPS :( can anyone help me figure out why? http://paste.ubuntu.com/7933466/
[13:38] <sync0pate> getting that from ssh -v
[13:38] <sync0pate> it happened after the hosting company did some "maintenance" and a reboot
[13:42] <sync0pate> nobody awake in here?
[13:45] <lordievader> sync0pate: Not a reboot proof vps?
[13:45] <sync0pate> obviously not lordievader
[13:45] <sync0pate> and the control panel doesn't let me so much as reboot it myself
[13:46] <sync0pate> I can upgrade it, or open a support ticket
[13:46] <lordievader> sync0pate: Then there is nothing you can do remotely without some kind of kvm support or something.
[13:46] <sync0pate> well
[13:46] <sync0pate> I've already opened a support ticket, but do you have any idea what could be causing it?
[13:46] <sync0pate> for when I finally get in
[13:47] <lordievader> Without any info it could be a million things.
[13:49] <sync0pate> any info?
[13:50] <sync0pate> any idea where I should start looking?
[13:51] <sync0pate> also I'm moving away from this host the second I can get in.
[13:51] <sync0pate> because fuck em
[13:51] <sync0pate> never have these problems with my other one
[13:56] <lordievader> sync0pate: Please watch your language.
[13:57] <lordievader> sync0pate: Start with the logs.
[13:57] <sync0pate> oh apologies, I didn't know there was no swearing in here
[13:57] <sync0pate> auth.log?
[13:57] <lordievader> sync0pate: All Ubuntu channels are family friendly.
[13:58] <sync0pate> kk
[13:58] <lordievader> sync0pate: That would be a start. In the best case it is a permission issue.
[13:59] <sync0pate> I'm just pretty sure there's been no changes to anything
[13:59] <sync0pate> I'm the only one who accesses it, apart from the hosting company
[13:59] <sync0pate> so they must have changed something
[13:59] <sync0pate> because I haven't touched it
[14:00] <lordievader> sync0pate: I'm not saying that that is the problem so don't jump to conclusions and blame someone before you have proof.
[14:00] <sync0pate> no absolutely, but I can't imagine how else it could've happened
[14:01] <sync0pate> I'm just rather annoyed at their awful service
[17:58] <jak2000> hi all why cant do a ifup eth0?   anyone can see:
[17:58] <jak2000> http://pastie.org/9439533
[18:01] <bekks> jak2000: Because eth0 is already up.
[18:02] <TJ-> jak2000: because you have a syntax error in 'interfaces'
[18:07] <jak2000> http://www.techienote.com/2012/04/how-to-configure-network-ubuntu-12-04.html
[18:07] <jak2000> wich is the erro TJ-?
[18:08] <TJ-> jak2000: "man resolvconf" is your clue
[18:19] <SierraAR> Any ideas why running do-release-update on 12.04.4 is telling me there are no releases? I was told I'd be able to run the update once 14.04.1 was out
[18:21] <TJ-> SierraAR: Yes, we've just answered that question in #ubuntu :)
[18:22] <SierraAR> It wouldnt be in my backlogs :P
[18:24] <TJ-> SierraAR: We are waiting for http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release-lts to have Trusty added. If you have precise-proposed enabled on 12.04, you should have an updated update-manager-core, and can do "do-release-upgrade --proposed"
[19:11] <jak2000> hi all, TJ- tell me i have a problem in interfaces file anyone can tell me where?
[19:11] <jak2000> http://pastie.org/9439533 thanks
[19:14] <PryMar56> jak2000, auto eth0
[19:18] <jak2000> remove these line?
[19:18] <jak2000> ok
[19:18] <klep> does anyone know why when pxe booting ubuntu 12.04 over network to ubuntu archives (I'm using MAAS) that the pxe process hangs on a purple screen and pegs the CPU for a matter of 10+ minutes before continuing?
[19:18] <jak2000> changing auto lo for auto eth0
[19:18] <bekks> No, fix it to "auto eth0 static"
[19:19] <bekks> Ah, THAT line you are talking about :)
[19:20] <jak2000> ok changed: auto lo to auto eth0
[19:20] <jak2000> sudo ifup eth0
[19:21] <jak2000> RTNETLINK answers: File exists
[19:21] <jak2000> Failed to bring up eth0.
[19:25] <jak2000> any advice?
[19:28] <klep> ifdown eth0
[19:29] <jak2000> ifdown: interface eth0 not configured
[19:29] <jak2000> $ sudo ifdown eth0
[19:30] <klep> sudo ifconfig eth0 down ;sudo dhclient eth0
[19:31] <klep> what's your interfaces file read like?
[19:31] <klep> auto eth0 dhcp
[19:32] <jak2000> in /etc/network/interfaces right?
[19:32] <jak2000> sudo ifconfig eth0 down ;sudo dhclient eth0
[19:32] <klep> yea
[19:32] <jak2000> but not apply i am wait and wait
[19:32] <jak2000> break?
[19:33] <klep> do you have a dhcp server?
[19:33] <klep> somewhere handing out ips?
[19:33] <jak2000> not
[19:33] <klep> ok then control C
[19:33] <jak2000> i have statics ips
[19:33] <klep> what IP address do you want to give it?
[19:33] <jak2000> 192.168.0.88/24 and gw=192.168.0.54
[19:34] <klep> sudo ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.88 255.255.255.0 up; route add default gw 192.168.0.54
[19:34] <klep> make sure you add sudo before the word route there too
[19:35] <jak2000> SIOCSIFADDR: Invalid argument
[19:36] <klep> what does ifconfig -a say ?
[19:37] <klep> sudo ifconfig -a
[19:39] <klep> well looks like ifdown works
[21:13] <fridaynext> this is my /etc/exports, and I can connect to my NFS shares, but I can't write to them. Can anyone see any settings I have that are blatantly wrong? http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=0s8FnRQM
[21:16] <Patrickdk> and what does mount show?
[21:22] <fridaynext> Patrickdk: well I'm trying to access from OSX.
[21:22] <fridaynext> Do you mean mount on the server?
[21:22] <Patrickdk> are you sure your using nfs v3?
[21:22] <fridaynext> webmin says I am.
[21:22] <Patrickdk> webmin?
[21:22] <fridaynext> (I set up the shares without webmin)
[21:22] <Patrickdk> your running webmin on osx?
[21:23] <fridaynext> No, running webmin on Ubuntu Server 14.04.1 on a standalone NAS I built
[21:23] <Patrickdk> I didn't ask what you where doing on ubuntu
[21:23] <Patrickdk> what is OSX using?
[21:23] <Patrickdk> nfs 3? nfs2? nfs4?
[21:23] <Patrickdk> oviously your attempting nfs3 on ubuntu
[21:24] <fridaynext> Oh I don't know what nfs OSX is using. I'll trying and research how to find that out.
[21:24] <Patrickdk> why I said, what does MOUNT say
[21:24] <Patrickdk> dunno why you have to research it
[21:25] <fridaynext> I asked if you meant mount on the server at 16:22. I'll check that now.
[21:25] <Patrickdk> mount on the server?
[21:25] <Patrickdk> why would you mount your nfs on the server?
[21:25] <fridaynext> This is mount on OSX http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=iznnhgYG
[21:25] <fridaynext> Show's they're all mounted.
[21:26] <fridaynext> but I'm setting version 3 on my ubuntu server, so I'll switch it to v4 and see if that works on OSX
[21:26] <Patrickdk> nfs4 is harder to setup
[21:27] <Patrickdk> odd, it doesn't say what version
[21:27] <Patrickdk> wait
[21:27] <fridaynext> a basic google search doesn't tell me what version it is either
[21:27] <Patrickdk> mounted by caseyfriday
[21:27] <Patrickdk> are you sure your permissions are right?
[21:27] <fridaynext> unforutantely, that's my username on both the server and the client, so I don't know which it's using
[21:27] <Patrickdk> the same UID on macos has write permissions on the ubuntu nfs folders?
[21:28] <Patrickdk> username doesn't matter, USERID does
[21:28] <Patrickdk> with nfs4, username + userid both matter
[21:28] <fridaynext> how do i check my uid?
[21:28] <Patrickdk> getent passwd | grep caseyfriday
[21:30] <guntbert> fridaynext:    id
[21:30] <Patrickdk> guess that works too :)
[21:30] <Patrickdk> I hardly ever lookup my own id
[21:32] <fridaynext> well the uid's are different on each machine (obviously?)
[21:39] <Patrickdk> well, then user permissions won't be enough
[21:39] <Patrickdk> you would have to use group permissions, with a common group id, or everyone permissions
[21:39] <Patrickdk> to be able to write
[21:41] <fridaynext> i have ownership set to nobody:nogroup, so how would I change the group to whatever a connected client is?
[21:42] <Patrickdk> first on the unix side
[21:42] <Patrickdk> try setting it to like, chmod a+rwx on one of those folders
[21:42] <Patrickdk> and see if that fixed the issue
[21:42] <Patrickdk> if no one else will be mounting these nfs folders, that is *secure enough*
[21:43] <fridaynext> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=TYeSnAeD
[21:43] <Patrickdk> if not, then we can fix it, after we know that corrects it
[21:43] <fridaynext> are those permissions wrong?
[21:43] <Patrickdk> yep, only nobody has write permissions :)
[21:43] <fridaynext> ah
[21:43] <Patrickdk> depends on what you want :)
[21:43] <Patrickdk> in your case, yep, wrong
[21:43] <fridaynext> i want to be able to write to some of the folders
[21:44] <fridaynext> well, all of them actually
[21:44] <Patrickdk> if you only want the osx system to use it
[21:44] <Patrickdk> just make it writable by the osx userid
[21:44] <fridaynext> ah, my osx user id.
[21:44] <Patrickdk> if you also want it writable on the ubuntu side too, alittle harder
[21:44] <fridaynext> how about just both?
[21:44] <fridaynext> is that a+rwx?
[21:44] <Patrickdk> then your stuck making a common user id on both, common group id on both, or everyone permissions
[21:45] <Patrickdk> a+rwx is everyone can write
[21:45] <fridaynext> sounds like that's what i want.
[21:45] <Patrickdk> or rather, everyone can read,write,execute/list-dir
[21:45] <fridaynext> it's all within a local network
[21:46] <Patrickdk> that is only marginal
[21:46] <Patrickdk> it's more if your osx had multible users
[21:46] <fridaynext> well, how do i add write permissions for my OSX uid?
[21:46] <Patrickdk> chown uid folder
[21:46] <Patrickdk> where uid is your osx userid
[21:47] <fridayne_> crappy internet connection. sorry.
[21:47] <Patrickdk> chown uid folder
[21:47] <Patrickdk> where uid is your osx userid
[21:48] <fridayne_> and then I can't write to that folder within ubuntu? or I could change the group, then add the different apps I want to write to it to that group?
[21:48] <Patrickdk> yes
[21:48] <fridayne_> so much work to make it work the way i want it.
[21:48] <Patrickdk> but you need to create that group with the same groupid on both ubuntu and osx
[21:48] <fridayne_> well on osx, 20 is the 'staff' group id
[21:48] <fridayne_> so I could just use that
[22:00] <fridaynext> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=aj6wNTmX
[22:03] <Patrickdk> works?
[22:04] <Patrickdk> might be using nfs4
[22:04] <Patrickdk> wonder what the option is in osx
[22:04] <Patrickdk> likely vers=3
[22:04] <Patrickdk> to mount it using v3
[22:04] <fridaynext> doesn't work
[22:05] <fridaynext> so if i just change the setting to v4 in the ubuntu server, that'll create more complications?
[22:05] <Patrickdk> v4 is nice, and secure, and adds a lot of stuff :)
[22:05] <Patrickdk> setting up kerberos, making userid and names match, ...
[22:06] <fridaynext> is that where the writers in mass effect got the idea for 'cerberus'?
[22:06] <Patrickdk> heh?
[22:06] <fridaynext> so kerberos between ubuntu and osx will likely be difficult?
[22:07] <Patrickdk> dunno
[22:09] <fridaynext> someone in the #macosx room says 10.9 runs nfs v3
[22:09] <fridaynext> so the versions should match.
[22:20] <Patrickdk> I know it does
[22:20] <Patrickdk> but I'm pretty sure it also runs nfs4
[22:20] <Patrickdk> the question is what does it run by default :)
[22:47] <fridaynext> i was also just able to connect via NFS4...
[22:50] <fridaynext> but i still can't write to the shares
[22:55] <Patrickdk> sorry, I don't do osx, and out of ideas, mainly cause I'm busy doing other things
[22:56] <fridaynext> i finally got it to work. sort of
[22:56] <fridaynext> i changed the owner to my osx uid
[22:57] <fridaynext> i'll just work with group id's within the ubuntu box
[22:57] <fridaynext> so my question is, it says I only have 14GB available within the share
[22:57] <Patrickdk> ah, so group wasn't working over nfs
[22:57] <fridaynext> I thought shares were just as big as they get?
[22:57] <fridaynext> no, group wasn't working
[22:57] <Patrickdk> share? what is a share?
[22:57] <fridaynext> an nfs share
[22:57] <Patrickdk> it's not a share :)
[22:58] <fridaynext> like, I'm sharing a folder from my Ubuntu box, so why would it say I don't have enough space?
[22:58] <Patrickdk> heh?
[22:58] <fridaynext> what is it?
[22:58] <fridaynext> if it's not a share?
[22:58] <Patrickdk> it should be the same on both
[22:58] <Patrickdk> an nfs mount
[22:58] <fridaynext> okay
[22:58] <Patrickdk> it's a shared filesystem
[22:58] <fridaynext> so it's a folder, sitting on an empty RAID5 array with 5.5TB usable space.
[22:58] <fridaynext> I'm wondering why it says I only have 14GB availabe...
[22:58] <Patrickdk> and what does ubuntu, df -h, show?
[22:59] <fridaynext> that it's not even in there. :)
[22:59] <fridaynext> so my raid array must not be mounted, or something
[23:00] <fridaynext> ah, my raid array switched from being md0 to being md127.  wtf.
[23:00] <Patrickdk> never use names
[23:00] <Patrickdk> use UUID
[23:00] <Patrickdk> use, blkid to find it
[23:01] <fridaynext> that didn't return anything (when i typed 'blkid /dev/md127')
[23:01] <Patrickdk> why did you put /dev/md127 on it?
[23:01] <Patrickdk> just, blkid
[23:01] <fridaynext> so in /etc/fstab, i should not have /dev/mdX?
[23:01] <Patrickdk> no
[23:01] <fridaynext> blkid returns nothign as well
[23:01] <Patrickdk> heh?
[23:02] <fridaynext> i need to find the UUID of my raid array, so I don't have to use /dev/md127 in /etc/fstab, correct?
[23:02] <Patrickdk> that would be best
[23:02] <Patrickdk> then it can move all it wants
[23:02] <Patrickdk> but I don't understand why blkid wouldn't see it
[23:02] <fridaynext> and i tried using blkid - but that command returned nothing.
[23:02] <Patrickdk> it should always
[23:03] <fridaynext> it's not currently mounted - is that why?
[23:03] <fridaynext> ah, found the UUID
[23:03] <fridaynext> mdadm --detail /dev/md127
[23:04] <fridaynext> is it okay for the UUID to have colons in it?
[23:04] <Patrickdk> if it does, it's not a uuid
[23:05] <Patrickdk> what does mdadm actually output for that?
[23:05] <fridaynext> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=AqcZzh6a
[23:05] <Patrickdk> wrong uuid
[23:05] <Patrickdk> that is the raid uuid
[23:06] <Patrickdk> not the filesystem
[23:06] <fridaynext> i thought that's waht I wanted, to tell /etc/fstab what to mount at boot up
[23:08] <Patrickdk> fstab doesn't mount raids
[23:08] <Patrickdk> it mounts filesystems
[23:09] <fridaynext> so how do i get the UUID of the filesystem that resides on the RAID array that I want to mount at boot up? (besides blkid, since that's reporting nothing)
[23:09] <Patrickdk> like, this is mine
[23:09] <Patrickdk> UUID=53681bc0-51fc-487d-b7cd-8639a9e6e5c3 /home		ext4	noatime	0 2
[23:09] <Patrickdk> and from, blkid it says
[23:09] <Patrickdk> /dev/md1: UUID="53681bc0-51fc-487d-b7cd-8639a9e6e5c3" TYPE="ext4"
[23:09] <fridaynext> I formatted the RAID xfs - does blkid work with that FS?
[23:09] <Patrickdk> and from mdadm --detail, UUID : 72233391:2532ba80:a494839d:76063f0b
[23:10] <Patrickdk> it should, I would think
[23:10] <fridaynext> this is so frustrating
[23:11] <Patrickdk> http://mindref.blogspot.com/2010/11/linux-partition-uuid.html
[23:11] <fridaynext> THERE it is.
[23:12] <z1haze> hello, I'm just trying to find some information on I would setup vm's on my dedicated server so i cant assign them to people?
[23:12] <fridaynext> now I wonder if I'll survive a reboot.
[23:12] <z1haze> I dont know a great deal about it so anyone who might be patient to try to help id appreciate it
[23:13] <fridaynext> z1haze: I set up a Windows 7 vm using KVM on my Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS server, so I know it can be done, but I definitely just followed tutorials online - don't remember how to do it.
[23:15] <fridaynext> Patrickdk: I'm mounted! df -h now shows /media/raid with 5.5T usable space.
[23:15] <fridaynext> It did delete all the folders I already created, but there weren't many, so nbd.
[23:16] <Patrickdk> unmount it
[23:17] <Patrickdk> move that /media/raid somewhere else
[23:17] <Patrickdk> mount it, then copy it back
[23:17] <fridaynext> ? why?
[23:17] <fridaynext> Oh, to preserve the folders. I already created them all again.
[23:17] <Patrickdk> to keep it clean, and no need to redo it
[23:17] <Patrickdk> well, unmount it and delete the old ones atleast
[23:17] <Patrickdk> so you don't get confused
[23:17] <Patrickdk> if it doesn't mount
[23:19] <fridaynext> i can't even force unmount it at the moment...
[23:19] <Patrickdk> ya, have to take down nfs first
[23:19] <fridaynext> still says resource busy
[23:22] <fridaynext> not sure what this means http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=CVdFdwPP
[23:24] <fridaynext> but perhaps that's why i can't unmount
[23:25] <z1haze> hmm
[23:28] <fridayne_> i am finally copying data over
[23:28] <fridayne_> looks like it's going at about 80-90MB/s, which is about the max speed I'd expect from WD Reds, so I'm pretty sure I'm getting max transfer speed over this wired connection!