[04:56] <pitti> Good morning
[07:16] <dkessel_> good morning quality :)
[07:20] <elfy> hi dkessel_
[17:39] <dkessel> balloons: are there any quality related events in the next weeks?
[17:39] <balloons> dkessel, I plan to have one for beta RTM, but didn't announce the date as the beta images slide back a week, so I'm holding my cards close :-)
[17:42] <balloons> we just had 2 image milestones the last couple weeks
[17:43]  * balloons looks at calendar
[17:43] <dkessel> ok...
[17:44] <balloons> beta 1 is at the end of the month, and it looks like precise 12.04.5 happens this week. Final beta is not until week of 22 sept
[17:45] <balloons> so yea for this month, we'll do an event for RTM.. Anything else you'd like to see?
[17:46] <dkessel> balloons: ok thanks :)
[17:47] <balloons> always happy to run an event for something
[17:47] <dkessel> i am currently looking at https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Utopic/view/AutoPkgTest/
[17:47] <dkessel> lots of unstable jobs there...
[17:48] <dkessel> this on is funny: utopic-adt-y-u-no-validate
[17:49] <dkessel> (because of the name...)
[17:53] <dkessel> balloons: ^ we could try to get some of those jobs fixed
[17:54] <balloons> dkessel, hehe.. I like the name also
[17:54] <balloons> dkessel, we most certainly could.. autopkgtest's are always unique
[17:55] <balloons> also autopkgtest can now run tests from autopilot and on the phone as well.. so it's a singluar solution for testing
[17:55] <balloons> if you didn't see pitti's article, have a look at it..it's a bit technical, but gives you the idea: http://www.piware.de/2014/07/deb-click-schroot-lxc-qemu-phone-cloud-one-autopkgtest-to-rule-them-all/
[17:55] <balloons> I should say, autopkgtest really got click support
[17:57] <balloons> dkessel, so all that said, I see more autopkg in our future. If you want to help out, I would encourage you to pick a test and ping jibel and pitti. They both work very closely with these tests
[17:58] <dkessel> balloons: yeah, i actually listened to pitti 's hangout last week (?) where he talked about it... great work!
[17:59] <balloons> dkessel, ohh excellent
[17:59] <jibel> dkessel, numbers of these jobs are direct sync from debian. It'd would indeed be great to have them fixed and the patchs upstreamed.
[18:02] <dkessel> jibel: i tried starting at the top. but i don't understand where the source for the package comes from...
[18:03] <dkessel> looks like ubuntu's version just had an initial version of the tests added... so there might be a fix upstream already
[18:49] <dkessel> stgraber: copying the "usermod" lines from https://www.stgraber.org/2014/01/17/lxc-1-0-unprivileged-containers/ is broken; the '--' part of the lines got converted to some other character in the blog.....
[18:50] <stgraber> dkessel: ah yeah, wordpress tends to be stupid like that, let me see if I can fix that
[18:52] <knome> stgraber, &#45;&#45;
[18:52] <knome> stgraber, should be no formatting problems if you wrapped the lines in code tags though
[19:00] <dkessel> hmmm any idea why lxc fails to start the container? log: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7954410/
[19:02] <dkessel> stgraber: do you think i have to configure something to make it work?
[19:05] <stgraber> dkessel: can you pastebin /proc/self/cgroup ?
[19:06] <dkessel> stgraber: there you go: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7954449/
[19:06] <stgraber> dkessel: what version of Ubuntu is that on?
[19:07] <dkessel> stgraber: trusty
[19:07] <stgraber> ok, it looks like you didn't reboot your machine after installing lxc so logind appears to be a bit confused with the cgroups
[19:08] <stgraber> you should at least logout and login again to have /proc/self/cgroup look good or just reboot the machine entirely
[19:08] <dkessel> ok that might be the reason brb
[19:11] <dkessel> stgraber: thanks, that worked :)
[19:11] <stgraber> good
[19:12] <ianorlin> I was doing an install entire disk testcase but get a wierd error message can't have end before the the start at selecting erase entire disk and install lubuntu and don't currently have a browser installed to switch to and report using apport
[19:12] <ianorlin> and dpkg is locked by ubiquity so how can I send the info with apport?
[19:15] <ianorlin> this is in a virtualbox virtual machine
[19:16] <ianorlin> not sure saving to file will help if has no partitions to save to
[19:20] <balloons> ianorlin, howdy
[19:21] <ianorlin> hi ballons
[19:21] <balloons> so I'm trying to follow along with what happened
[19:22] <balloons> the end result though is you need to report a bug from the vm right?
[19:22] <ianorlin> yes
[19:24] <balloons> for reference we have a page to help with this: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Overview/Install_Bugs
[19:24] <balloons> if your question isn't answered by it, I'll add the info
[19:24] <balloons> so that said, I would recommend saving the bug report to file later as is suggested
[19:25] <balloons> ahh but I see you note you don't have anything to save to.. you can also ssh into the machine and get the file
[19:33] <ianorlin> I don't have a server runnning on the installer I don't think so would need to ssh from the vm with the save command from apport
[19:33] <average_guy> I am having the same problem with all utopic-daily img's for last several days ianorlin
[19:34] <balloons> mmm.. is there a bug for this?
[19:37] <average_guy> I filed a bug and failed a testcase, the bug seems to be gone from the list now tho
[19:38] <balloons> average_guy, care to share the bug?
[19:38] <average_guy> i figured it must be on my end, have tried many diff reconfig on host, problem persists
[19:38] <average_guy> I can't find it now balloons
[19:39] <balloons> heh.. if you filed it, it will show under your name in lp
[19:39] <average_guy> maybe I dreamed I filed it, cuz its not there
[19:45] <average_guy> 1352252
[19:48] <ianorlin> that seems like it
[19:48] <balloons> bug 1352252
[19:49] <balloons> nice, thanks for that
[19:50] <average_guy> I just failed several testcases I have been trying to make work ianorlin now that I know its not just me
[19:51] <balloons> thanks for pointing it out.. sanity checks help everyone
[23:29] <teward> are there Utopic ISOs out there at all?  I'd like to spin up a Utopic ISO to test something to see if I can replicate it in Utopic as well as Trusty...
[23:30] <teward> not sure where/if there're ISOs spun up yet.
[23:55] <Nothing_Much> teward: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/ Try that