[07:04] <Saviq> o/
[07:27] <tsdgeos> Saviq: let's land stuff :D
[07:27] <Saviq> tsdgeos, dash-as-app is next in store, and there's still two issues to solve
[07:28] <tsdgeos> ok :/
[07:29] <tsdgeos> Saviq: who's working on them?
[07:29] <Saviq> tsdgeos, Daniel and myself
[07:29] <Saviq> tsdgeos, or you could take over the second issue (meaning can't launch apps from dash from silo 7)
[07:30] <Saviq> tsdgeos, we suspect click scope not sending proper appid:///, application:/// urls
[07:30] <tsdgeos> Saviq: well i'm doing altnav, but if this is more important i can have a look if you want
[07:30] <Saviq> tsdgeos, nah, do your stuff
[07:30] <tsdgeos> oki
[07:30] <Saviq> tsdgeos, we need to wait for Daniel anyway
[07:31] <tsdgeos> oki
[07:35] <tsdgeos> Saviq: this is old, no ? https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/grid-see-more/+merge/226297 disapprove?
[07:36] <Saviq> tsdgeos, done
[07:36] <Saviq> mhr3, hey, the trace here bug #1351801 looks rather similar to bug #1348702, don't you think?
[07:37] <mhr3> hmm, doesn't look completely the same
[07:57] <Saviq> mhr3, symbols are not complete, though
[07:57] <mhr3> Saviq, yea, just had a look at the raw .crash file, looks very similar there, but the retrace is weird
[07:59] <Saviq> mhr3, agreed
[08:25] <tsdgeos> ah!
[08:25] <tsdgeos> i know what's making the test_departments unstable
[08:26] <tsdgeos> now onto a fix
[08:35] <mhr3> tsdgeos, hey, so question - could we land the nav + altnav in its current form and then look into what would be needed to properly support navigating from the middle of the tree?
[08:35] <tsdgeos> mhr3: well, there's no altnav :D
[08:35] <tsdgeos> so i guess no
[08:35] <mhr3> tsdgeos, after that then
[08:36] <tsdgeos> sure, when there's altnav, hopefully at the end of today
[08:36] <tsdgeos> we can land it
[08:36] <tsdgeos> and then explore the other stuff
[08:36] <mhr3> k
[08:36] <jgdx> h
[08:40] <Cimi> Saviq, https://code.launchpad.net/~fboucault/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/flickable_right_speed
[08:43] <mhr3> Cimi, is there a branch with the scope settings?
[08:43] <Cimi> mhr3, I am starting now
[08:43] <Cimi> mhr3, will finish this week
[08:44] <mhr3> Cimi, let me know once there's something testable
[08:45] <Cimi> mhr3, tomorrow you coming here?
[08:45] <tsdgeos> Saviq: what's the thing that regenerates tests/mocks/Unity/Unity.qmltypes ?
[08:46] <tsdgeos> qmlplugindump?
[08:46] <mhr3> Cimi, yep, and you'll get told off if it aint ready then! :P
[08:46] <tsdgeos> do we have a way to update it? or just call it manually?
[08:46] <Cimi> mhr3, you are gonna leave, why you care that much? :)
[08:46] <Cimi> mhr3, you wanna stay? :)
[08:48] <mhr3> Cimi, who said i will be doing the telling off? :)
[09:01] <tsdgeos> mhr3: i think i'm going to split it in two branches
[09:01] <tsdgeos> one in lp:~unity-team/unity8/scopes-v4 that is mostly getting it to compile with scopes-v4 + renaming
[09:02] <tsdgeos> and another one dependent on that that actually implements alt nav
[09:02] <mhr3> tsdgeos, sounds good to me, at least we can land the v4 stuff
[09:02] <tsdgeos> easier to review i'd say
[09:02] <tsdgeos> also if we want to land v4 we can do now yes
[09:34] <tsdgeos> Saviq: do we use CachingNetworkManagerFactory at all?
[09:34] <Saviq> tsdgeos, yes
[09:34] <tsdgeos> we do
[09:35] <tsdgeos> damn files that have classe isnide with different names :D
[09:35] <Saviq> ;)
[09:35] <tsdgeos> i guess we don't care it leaks
[09:35] <tsdgeos> since it's app-long lived
[09:36] <Saviq> tsdgeos, well, it's shell-lived, if that's what you mean
[09:36] <tsdgeos> yeah
[09:36] <tsdgeos> shell is an app ;)
[09:37] <Saviq> not sure we shouldn't care about leaks in the shell ;)
[09:37] <tsdgeos> Saviq: it's only a leak when you shut down
[09:37] <Saviq> ah ok
[09:37] <tsdgeos> which who cares :D
[09:37] <tsdgeos> i mean it's technically one
[09:37] <tsdgeos> but bleh
[09:42] <paulliu> cwayne1: ping
[09:49] <tsdgeos> mhr3: did we decide that there would only be altnavigation if there was navigation?
[09:49] <mhr3> tsdgeos, no
[09:50] <mhr3> tsdgeos, right now you can have altnav and no nav
[09:50] <tsdgeos> ok, not a big issue either
[09:50] <tsdgeos> just to know what's possible :D
[10:52] <tsdgeos> anyone thinks how i could do this if at all? http://paste.ubuntu.com/7950889/
[10:53] <mhr3> tsdgeos, connect to both :)
[10:53] <tsdgeos> sure
[10:53] <mhr3> and ignore one :)
[10:53] <tsdgeos> that i have
[10:53] <tsdgeos> but is lame
[10:53] <tsdgeos> in the "oh look how cool is this" world
[10:53] <mhr3> but works :)
[10:53] <tsdgeos> sure
[10:54] <Saviq> tsdgeos, other than dynamically creating that object, don't think so
[10:54] <mhr3> tsdgeos, you could always generate some qml ;P
[10:55] <tsdgeos> hmmm
[10:55] <tsdgeos> good idea
[10:55] <tsdgeos> not
[11:06] <facundobatista> Holas
[11:07] <mhr3> Saviq, seen http://paste.ubuntu.com/7950960/ ?
[11:07] <mhr3> Saviq, media-hub / dbus-cpp crash in u8
[11:11] <tsdgeos> Saviq: so we have any visuals on how the double navigation has to look like?
[11:11] <tsdgeos> i understand it's half-half for buttons
[11:11] <tsdgeos> the list is still full width
[11:11] <tsdgeos> but i'm interested in how the buttons look when the list is open
[11:11] <tsdgeos> to show the list belongs to the left or the right
[11:12] <tsdgeos> is it only the ^ merker or there's something else?
[11:14] <cwayne1> paulliu: (late) pong
[11:16] <paulliu> cwayne1: What data are you actually passed to attributes?
[11:17] <cwayne1> paulliu: 2014/08/04 07:16:52 [{4.00mi } {(4) http://s3-media2.fl.yelpcdn.com/assets/2/www/img/ccf2b76faa2c/ico/stars/v1/stars_large_4.png}]
[11:17] <paulliu> cwayne1: is that a rating?
[11:17] <cwayne1> paulliu: its suppose to be a number of ratings, and then the image I get from the API
[11:23] <mhr3> tsdgeos, page 5 https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/1rtLO2iSm0rfTtoI7iKtGt2pVlf_65FOFZWG8rpFN2U4/edit
[11:24] <tsdgeos> hmmmm
[11:26] <tsdgeos> is it whiter because it's amazon?
[11:28] <mhr3> tsdgeos, don't think so
[11:29] <mhr3> tsdgeos, maybe it's whiter cause there's two
[11:29] <tsdgeos> sure
[11:29] <tsdgeos> but the selected one
[11:29] <mhr3> tsdgeos, or maybe it's supposed to be whiter even now when you activate it
[11:29] <tsdgeos> gets white
[11:29] <tsdgeos> but in a blue scope
[11:29] <tsdgeos> that'd be weird?
[11:32] <mhr3> tsdgeos, similarly weird than having white departments in a blue scope?
[11:33] <tsdgeos> correct :D
[11:33] <tsdgeos> i always expected people would complain about that
[11:33] <paulliu> cwayne1: very weird. Actually I cannot reproduce your bug.
[11:33] <cwayne1> paulliu: even with the click I sent?
[11:34] <paulliu> cwayne1: wait. Let me try your click
[11:34] <mhr3> cwayne1, are there any scopes that override the background color?
[11:34] <cwayne1> mhr3: i know of one, the rest only override the pageheader background
[11:35] <mhr3> cwayne1, and it overrides it to black i guess?
[11:35] <cwayne1> uh, i think light blue
[11:36] <mhr3> cwayne1, oh.. we're wondering what do departments look like in that situation, cause they'll be white, right?
[11:36] <cwayne1> hah this one doesnt have depts
[11:36] <cwayne1> but no, they inherit the color
[11:36] <paulliu> cwayne1: btw, how to let yelp scope to get some data? I saw empty.
[11:36] <mhr3> cwayne1, oh?
[11:37] <mhr3> cwayne1, in that case it's solved i guess :)
[11:37] <cwayne1> paulliu: should just work.. i wonder if it doesn't have data for wherever you are?
[11:37] <mhr3> tsdgeos, so yes, make it blue then
[11:37] <cwayne1> mhr3: id check with Saviq, but i recall it inheriting the color
[11:37] <paulliu> cwayne1: Do I need to login to somewhere?
[11:38] <cwayne1> paulliu: nope
[11:38] <paulliu> cwayne1: I'm in blue-fin office right now. Should be good.
[11:38] <tsdgeos> mhr3: cwayne1: oh yes, they alrady inherit the colors
[11:38] <tsdgeos> mhr3: so i guess i'll just put some opacity layer on the non open one and bedone
[11:38] <tsdgeos> until someone complains :D
[11:39] <cwayne1> paulliu: agh crap. bluefin's squid proxy breaks it
[11:39] <cwayne1> paulliu: can you run it on mobile data instead?
[11:40] <paulliu> cwayne1: I can't. I don't have a SIM card here.
[11:40] <cwayne1> damnit
[11:41] <paulliu> cwayne1: I'll be back to Taiwan tomorrow. Let's see if it works then.
[11:43] <cwayne1> paulliu: cool, thanks.  it just seems weird to me that it works pefectly in scope-tool, but doesnt on device
[11:44] <paulliu> cwayne1: yeah. I'll check it on devices.
[11:45] <dandrader> damn, unity 7 on my desktop is freezing right after entering the password
[11:48] <dandrader> bregma_, any tips? ^
[11:48] <paulliu> dandrader: upgrade in console?
[11:48] <paulliu> dandrader: maybe it is not freezing. Just very slow.
[11:49] <dandrader> upgraded & rebooted already
[11:59] <Saviq> tsdgeos, mhr3, yeah design for that is somewhat inconsistent
[11:59] <Saviq> the amazon document isn't really visual design
[11:59] <Saviq> tsdgeos, we need to introduce a background color behind the nav buttons in any case
[12:00] <mhr3> tsdgeos, opacity layer? eek? the color is supposed to be customizable
[12:00] <mhr3> s/eek\?/eek!/
[12:02] <dandrader> paulliu, that solved it... http://www.webupd8.org/2012/10/how-to-reset-compiz-and-unity-in-ubuntu.html although now I can only make it work by running "unity-reset" :/
[12:27] <Saviq> dandrader, hey, any progress on shell locking up with dash as app?
[12:27] <kgunn> was just wondering too ^
[12:28] <Saviq> oh there's two elopios
[12:28] <Saviq> elopio, I just got silo 7 installed and I can run apps from dash just fine, isn't that what you reported not working for you?
[12:30] <dandrader> Saviq, kgunn, not today as so far I've been just struggling with getting unity7 on my desktop to work again and copying the work form laptop to desktop
[12:30] <dandrader> from
[12:33] <dandrader> Saviq, kgunn apart from that I'm not stuck. but updating tests, mocks has taken quite a bit of my time last Friday and it's still not done
[12:41] <mhr3> jhodapp, looks familiar? http://paste.ubuntu.com/7950960/
[12:42] <kgunn> dandrader: ack
[12:43] <jhodapp> mhr3, not really...when are you getting that?
[12:44] <Saviq> mhr3, anywhere we should look at for paulliu_ to be able to implement interactive: false?
[12:46] <Saviq> mhr3, or will it just be if (template["interactive"]) { }?
[12:57] <tsdgeos> mhr3: i found a nicer way to make it nice
[12:57] <tsdgeos> wait for lats bits
[12:58] <mhr3> jhodapp, u8 crash, without retrace it was pointing into libmedia-hub-client
[12:59] <mhr3> Saviq, let's make it "non-interactive", so default == false
[13:00] <Saviq> paulliu_, ok so ↑, please in GenericScopeView check whether template["non-interactive"] is true, and ignore taps / long presses
[13:00] <Saviq> paulliu_, base off of Cimi's touchdown branch so that you can disable the touchdown effect, too
[13:00] <mhr3> pstolowski, fyi ^
[13:01] <paulliu_> Saviq: ok. got it.
[13:02] <pstolowski> mhr3, Saviq fine by me, thanks!
[13:03] <jhodapp> mhr3, is that when doing a song preview?
[13:03] <mhr3> jhodapp, it actually happened when i was closing everything
[13:03] <jhodapp> mhr3, what do you mean? closing what exactly?
[13:03] <mhr3> jhodapp, preview with the audio components was long dead at that point
[13:04] <tsdgeos> mhr3: have a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/alt_nav_support/+merge/229448
[13:04] <mhr3> jhodapp, well, long in computer terms, a second...
[13:05] <mhr3> ish
[13:05] <jhodapp> mhr3, right, but what were you closing?
[13:05] <mhr3> jhodapp, the entire scope
[13:06] <Saviq> mhr3, about https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity-scopes-shell/drop-appid-workaround/+merge/228427
[13:06] <Saviq> mhr3, should we even have the if(application) still?
[13:07] <jhodapp> mhr3, interesting...seems like things might be getting destroyed in the wrong order then...it was trying to get the playback status but perhaps the media-hub instance was already destroyed
[13:07] <mhr3> Saviq, i won't cry if we drop it :)
[13:07] <mhr3> jhodapp, sounds about right
[13:08] <mhr3> jhodapp, or maybe it just got the reply after it was destroyed
[13:08] <jhodapp> mhr3, right exactly
[13:08] <Saviq> mhr3, how about activateApplication then?
[13:08] <jhodapp> mhr3, I know that ricmm and mandel had a lot of problems with gcc4.9 with crashers and such
[13:09] <mhr3> Saviq, i never needed it, was for you guys
[13:09] <Saviq> mhr3, yeah, drop in v4?
[13:09] <mhr3> Saviq, fine with me
[13:10] <tsdgeos> mhr3: https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/alt_nav_support/+merge/229451 with the proper prerequisite
[13:11] <Saviq> mhr3, will activateUri ever get a scope:// uri still?
[13:11]  * Saviq will drop activateUri() altogether if follows that path
[13:11] <mhr3> tsdgeos, file:///home/miso/projects/unity8/qml/ScopeTool.qml:75:9: Cannot assign to non-existent property "model"
[13:12] <tsdgeos> ah right
[13:12] <tsdgeos> need to update scopetool
[13:12] <tsdgeos> mhr3: just remove that line i think
[13:12] <tsdgeos> or give me a sec to fix it
[13:13] <mhr3> Saviq, yes
[13:13] <mhr3> Saviq, but activateUri isn't Q_INVOKABLE, is it?
[13:13] <Saviq> mhr3, yeah, is not
[13:14] <mhr3> Saviq, so leave my methods alone :)
[13:15] <tsdgeos> mhr3: fixed
[13:15] <mhr3> ty
[13:15] <tsdgeos> wait n
[13:15] <tsdgeos>  Could not acquire lock
[13:15] <mhr3> nothing to pull
[13:15] <tsdgeos> who has the lock on my branch?
[13:15] <tsdgeos> anyhow pushed now
[13:15] <mhr3> only you can :)
[13:15] <tsdgeos> mhr3: ↑
[13:16] <tsdgeos> i think wrong timed ctrl+c did it
[13:17] <mhr3> tsdgeos, hm, i get no departments in the tool now
[13:18] <mhr3> tsdgeos, http://paste.ubuntu.com/7951864/
[13:18] <mhr3> oh wait... maybe i don't have correct shell plugin installed :)
[13:19] <tsdgeos> looks like it
[13:19] <tsdgeos> mhr3: also for the "hidden" trick to work we may need the shell plugin to work like the ui code "needs"
[13:20] <tsdgeos> or maybe not
[13:20] <mhr3> what does that mean?
[13:20] <tsdgeos> and it's just my plugin code being crap :D
[13:20] <tsdgeos> probably not
[13:20] <tsdgeos> or maybe yes
[13:20] <tsdgeos> don't know :D
[13:21] <Saviq> mhr3, re-review https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity-scopes-shell/drop-appid-workaround/+merge/228427 please?
[13:21] <tsdgeos> mhr3: basically you need to return the hidden "node" as currentId and once i query for it change the currentid to the selected one
[13:21] <tsdgeos> mhr3: something like this http://paste.ubuntu.com/7951882/
[13:23] <Saviq> mhr3, I'll leave the handler be until we land v4 then
[13:24] <mhr3> Saviq, k
[13:26] <mhr3> tsdgeos, that is weird, can't we do something less weird?
[13:27] <tsdgeos> mhr3: thing is the code was never designed to do jumps
[13:27] <tsdgeos> so it doesn't know how it can be currently in a child without even being in the aprt
[13:27] <tsdgeos> parent
[13:27] <tsdgeos> so i need to get the parent first
[13:27] <mhr3> tsdgeos, btw i'm loosing the state when playing with both navs, not sure if it's the ui or the plugin... or the scope
[13:28] <tsdgeos> mhr3: it's separate items in the ui
[13:28] <tsdgeos> should not break there (i think)
[13:30] <tsdgeos> mhr3: but if you think it may be because of the ui give me a way to reproduce the problem
[13:36] <cwayne1> what is alt-nav-support?
[13:36] <Saviq> cwayne1, aka sort order
[13:36] <cwayne1> i.e. sort by price or rating?
[13:38] <Saviq> cwayne1, i.e. whatever the scope sends
[13:39] <Saviq> cwayne1, but yes, it's meant to be used for secondary navigation (next to departments)
[13:39] <mhr3> tsdgeos, looks like plugin issue
[13:39] <cwayne1> Saviq: and that's separate from filters right
[13:40] <Saviq> cwayne1, yes
[13:40] <tsdgeos> mhr3: oki
[13:43] <mhr3> tsdgeos, shoot... i f-ed up
[13:43] <tsdgeos> mhr3: can be fixed?
[13:44] <mhr3> tsdgeos, my brilliant idea of dropping loadDepartment() and just using using performQuery, means that i'd need to mangle the queries in one nav everytime you switch state in the other
[13:45] <tsdgeos> :D
[13:45] <Saviq> mhr3, you mean in the cache you keep? eek
[13:46] <mhr3> fsck
[13:49] <mhr3> tsdgeos, will you kill me if i ask to revert that?
[13:50] <tsdgeos> mhr3: so what do you want to do?
[13:50] <mhr3> tsdgeos, ie drop the *query props and role from the nav interface, and keep using loadDepartment() instead of performQuery()
[13:51] <mhr3> tsdgeos, or like setNavState(bool alt, string state_id);
[13:51] <tsdgeos> mhr3: one loadDepartment or two loadDepartment?
[13:52] <mhr3> i'd still prefer a single method, but need to distinguish for which one is it, so has to have extra param at least
[13:53] <tsdgeos> mhr3: if it has to be done, it has to be done
[13:53] <tsdgeos> please ping me when you've updated the api so i can follow up
[13:53] <mhr3> tsdgeos, ok... sorry about that :/
[13:58] <tsdgeos> no worries, what has to be done has to be done
[13:59] <elopio> Saviq: that was when I compiled the branch myself. I couldn't reproduce it from the silo.
[13:59] <elopio> On the silo, my problem was showing the dash when an app was loading. Can you give that a try?
[13:59] <Saviq> elopio, yeah, that we're onto
[13:59] <Saviq> elopio, great, means that's our last issue, dandrader is on it
[13:59] <elopio> Saviq: ok, thanks.
[13:59] <Saviq> elopioI
[14:00] <Saviq> I'm just reviewing your branch, few small comments coming up
[14:04] <elopio> Saviq: great. After my meetings I'll take care of them.
[14:04] <mhr3> tsdgeos, pushed query drop
[14:04] <mhr3> Saviq, also activateApplication drop
[14:05] <Saviq> mhr3, ktx
[14:05] <tsdgeos> Saviq: mhr3: and what do we do with activateApplication dependant code in the shell?
[14:05] <mhr3> Saviq, oh yea, maybe we should have left it for later?
[14:06] <Saviq> tsdgeos, we remove it in v4
[14:06] <Saviq> tsdgeos, there's only 4 lines
[14:06] <tsdgeos> Saviq: no replacement?
[14:06] <Saviq> tsdgeos, dash-as-app replaces it
[14:06] <tsdgeos> ok
[14:06] <Saviq> tsdgeos, by launching directly with Qt.openUrlExternally
[14:06] <mhr3> tsdgeos, but without dash-as-app it's no good
[14:06] <Saviq> mhr3, dash-as-app lands before anything else in unity8
[14:06] <mhr3> ok
[14:07] <mhr3> Saviq, and if it needs to be reverted?
[14:07] <Saviq> mhr3, it doesn't :P
[14:07]  * mhr3 remembers greeter :P
[14:07] <Saviq> mterry, mhr3 is here for you ↑
[14:08] <mterry> :)
[14:09] <pstolowski> tsdgeos, hey, is there a silo with https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/scopeActivatePreview/+merge/228624 by any chance?
[14:09] <tsdgeos> Saviq: ↑ ¿
[14:09] <Saviq> pstolowski, not reviewed yet, no
[14:10] <pstolowski> ack, thanks
[14:18] <mzanetti> https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity-api/scopes-v4/+merge/228346/comments/556463
[14:18] <mzanetti> hehe.. when I proposed this the answer was: If changing we should add activate* for the others too :P
[14:21] <Saviq> mzanetti, go away
[14:22] <mzanetti> Saviq: in an hour
[14:22] <Saviq> mzanetti, didn't get your sentence anyway :P
[14:22] <mzanetti> Saviq: well. I proposed exactly that when I started with dash-as-app
[14:23] <Saviq> mzanetti, should've made it happen then ;)
[14:23] <mzanetti> and mhr3's opinion was that the others should have activate*() signals too instead of removing the one for apps
[14:24] <Saviq> mzanetti, apparently he doesn't care any more for some reason ;)
[14:24] <mzanetti> yeah... I guess so :(
[14:28] <mhr3> mzanetti, i mostly wanted single place that deals with it
[14:29] <mhr3> if that's url-dispatcher... so be it
[14:29] <mzanetti> mhr3: yeah, same here :)
[14:29] <mzanetti> mhr3: no worries... just had to grin a little when the mail notification showed up on my screen before
[14:29] <mhr3> but imo it would be cleaner if there was just a heyHandleThis(url) signal
[14:29] <mzanetti> I'm not really here today anyways
[14:34] <tsdgeos> mhr3: pushed the api changes
[14:40] <MacSlow> mzanetti, aren't you on vacation? :)
[14:40] <tedg> Saviq, Is there a reason the packages in the dash-as-app silo aren't built? Can we click the build button?
[14:41] <mzanetti> MacSlow: yup
[14:41] <Saviq> tedg, they are
[14:41] <Saviq> tedg, it was a reconf just to drop qtdeclarative from it
[14:41] <Saviq> tedg, I can kick a WATCH_ONLY if you want ;)
[14:42] <tedg> Heh, okay.
[14:42] <Saviq> done
[14:42] <Saviq> since you're the 2nd person asking me that today ;)
[14:44] <Saviq> elopio, yikes there's three of you nwo
[14:44] <Saviq> now
[14:44] <Saviq> elopio, reviewed dash as app ap
[14:44]  * Saviq restarts xchat, got confused with elopio
[14:44] <elopio> I could use two more of myself :)
[14:47] <Wellark> dednick: can we go forward with this one? AFAIK it will conflict with your indicator-polish branch as it ccontains the same fix separately: https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-api-team/unity8/default-indicator-page-loader-visible-fix/+merge/228943
[14:47] <Wellark> how close are you to land your branch?
[14:49] <Saviq> Wellark, check the status on that MP again ;)
[14:49] <elopio> Saviq: I'll make the corrections, thanks for the detailed review. Any suggestions about the is_job_running function?
[14:50] <elopio> I could just try to stop the dash without checking if it was running.
[14:51] <Wellark> Saviq: :D
[14:51] <Wellark> right
[14:51] <Wellark> Saviq, dednick: thanks!
[14:53] <Wellark> Estilanda: could you approve the design changes in here: https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-api-team/unity8/modeminfo/+merge/225159
[14:53] <Saviq> elopio, I think you need to check for just start/ instead
[14:53] <Saviq> elopio, if you just stop, and it's not started, you'll get a bad exit code
[14:57] <tsdgeos> mterry: ping
[14:58] <mterry> tsdgeos, hello!
[14:58] <tsdgeos> mterry: i can swipe the greeter to the left in the first screen
[14:58] <tsdgeos> known bug?
[14:58] <tsdgeos> or shall i file one?
[14:58] <mterry> tsdgeos, uh, known behavior.  I haven't asked design whether it's a bug or not
[14:59] <mterry> tsdgeos, the swipe left behavior was added after the edge demo.  I'm not sure it's awful to allow it?
[14:59] <mterry> But design might think differently,sure.  Worth filing a bug against ubuntu-ux, assigning to esti maybe, and confirming with them
[15:00] <tsdgeos> it feels quite confusing
[15:01] <tsdgeos> that you're telling me how to swipe from right
[15:01] <tsdgeos> and i can also swipe from left
[15:01] <tsdgeos> none of the other screens let me do taht
[15:12] <mhr3> tsdgeos, pushed the plugin, things seems to work fine now
[15:13] <tsdgeos> goodie
[15:14] <tsdgeos> Saviq: https://code.launchpad.net/~cimi/unity8/card_emblems_single_container/+merge/223899 approved or rejected?
[15:14] <tsdgeos> ah rejected
[15:14]  * tsdgeos can't read
[15:16] <tsdgeos> mhr3: did you try the hidden stuff?
[15:16] <mhr3> tsdgeos, kindof... i didn't notice it not working :)
[15:16] <tsdgeos> ok :D
[15:17] <Saviq> @unity when reviewing, please make sure to click "claim review" at the top so that you don't clash
[15:17]  * tsdgeos does that when really reviewing
[15:17] <Saviq> yup, good
[15:17] <tsdgeos> the rest i have comments on are either "needs fixing" because of merges or "abstain" because of fixed meregs
[15:43] <Cimi> Saviq, best way to put settings is like PreviewListView on right of the scope?
[15:43] <Cimi> or we have other ideas?
[15:44] <Saviq> Cimi, probably, yeah, just a page on top of the scope
[15:44] <Cimi> Saviq, fading in or sliding like previews?
[15:44] <Saviq> Cimi, sliding, same
[15:44] <Cimi> ok
[15:44] <Saviq> Cimi, anyway, who am I to say ;)
[15:44] <Saviq> Cimi, you've got designers closer than I do
[15:45] <Cimi> Saviq, yeah, just wondering if you had chat on it
[15:45] <Saviq> Cimi, truth is we really need to make all these transitions consistent, using a PageStack or so, they're all over the place now
[15:45] <Saviq> but well, SDK doesn't support animated pagestacks :|
[15:45] <Saviq> yet
[15:51] <mhr3> Saviq, think we'll need a Q_INVOKABLE void forceSearch() on the Scope object
[15:51] <Saviq> mhr3, you mean a refresh()?
[15:51] <mhr3> Saviq, yea
[15:51] <Saviq> mhr3, yeah, thought so
[15:51] <mhr3> Saviq, for those refresh button
[15:51] <mhr3> s
[15:51] <Saviq> +2
[15:51] <Saviq> (because we have two of those) :P
[15:51] <mhr3> Saviq, adding to v4 :)
[15:52] <Saviq> yup
[15:52] <mhr3> Saviq, slot or invokable?
[15:52] <Saviq> mhr3, same thing, really
[15:52] <mhr3> can slot be virtual actually?
[15:52] <mhr3> never tried that
[15:52] <Saviq> mhr3, yeah it can
[16:09] <Cimi> tsdgeos, is this edge demo or welcome wizard? https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity8/+bug/1352408
[16:10] <Saviq> Cimi, edge demo indeed
[16:10] <Cimi> ok
[16:11] <tsdgeos> Cimi: right sorry
[16:14] <dednick> Saviq: how do i get ubuntu-app-launch to recognise an arbitrary process as an application?
[16:14] <Saviq> dednick, you don't
[16:15] <dednick> Saviq: say that i want to.
[16:15] <dednick> :)
[16:15] <Saviq> dednick, if you want for qtmir to recognize it as an app, pass --desktop_file_hint=/path/to/desktop/file
[16:15] <Saviq> but that's something that happens in qtmir, not in ual
[16:15] <Saviq> dednick, there's no way to inject processes into ual
[16:15] <dednick> Saviq: what i mean is, how does ual know about apps?
[16:15] <dednick> app-ids
[16:15] <Saviq> dednick, it starts them
[16:16] <dednick> Saviq: right. so an upstart config?
[16:16] <Saviq> dednick, there's a job or two, application-click, application-legacy
[16:16] <Saviq> dednick, that UAL passes some args to
[16:16] <Saviq> dednick, dpkg -L ubuntu-app-launch
[16:17] <dednick> Saviq: thanks
[16:19] <Saviq> o/
[16:31] <Cimi> dednick, mhr3 tomorrow lunch?
[16:31] <dednick> honest!
[16:31] <mhr3> burgers!
[16:31] <dednick> Cimi: i think that's a yes
[16:32] <Cimi> hah
[16:55] <elopio> Saviq: I pushed changes for all your comments.
[17:04] <Saviq> elopio, thanks
[20:13] <kgunn> elopio: what's the easiest means to repro the freeze bug on dash-as-app silo ?
[20:13] <kgunn> i'm assuming ap test ?
[20:14] <kgunn> i can't get it to happen manually
[20:24] <elopio> kgunn: I could reproduce it manually a lot easier than with autopilot.
[20:24] <elopio> but with autopilot, run the test:
[20:24] <elopio> unity8.application_lifecycle.tests.test_url_dispatcher.URLDispatcherTestCase.test_swipe_out_application_started_by_url_dispatcher
[20:26] <kgunn> elopio: its basically right edge app switcher right ?
[20:52] <elopio> kgunn: no, left edge to show the dash.
[20:53] <kgunn> elopio: hehe, that might explain it :)....lemme play some more, pretty sure i've been doing that as well
[20:55] <elopio> kgunn: Saviq said dandrader was already fixing it.
[20:58] <kgunn> elopio: yeah, but hasn't....i'm testing lastest proposed with silo7
[20:58] <kgunn> i'll run the ap test in a moment...but i can't get this to do it manually
[20:59] <kgunn> elopio: just to make sure that's on n4 right ?
[20:59] <kgunn> that you're seeing this issue ?
[21:01] <elopio> kgunn: yes, nexus 4.
[21:01] <elopio> I haven't tried since the silo was ready, but I guess not much has changed.
[21:01] <elopio> launch an app, and while it's on the black screen loading, swipe from the left to show the dash.
[21:03] <Saviq> yeah I've been able to reproduce reliably, and that is what the one failing test triggers as well
[21:03] <mhall119> Saviq: mhr3: does searching in a scope limit the results based on a selected category? or is it up to the scope author to do that?
[21:03] <Saviq> mhall119, scope author
[21:03] <mhall119> ok
[21:03] <mhr3> mhall119, the client can impose limits
[21:04] <mhr3> but i don't think it does atm
[21:04] <mhr3> Saviq, oh, did you try to call me czech number last week?
[21:04] <mhr3> s/me/my/\
[21:04] <Saviq> mhr3, yeah I did ;)
[21:04] <mhr3> i guess i noticed a bit too late
[21:05] <mhr3> ie 15 minutes ago :P
[21:05] <Saviq> mhr3, nice latency ;
[21:05] <Saviq> ;)
[21:05] <mhr3> Saviq, that's the better latency, before this i checked it about 3months ago :P
[21:06] <Saviq> mhr3, ROFL just saw your directory photo, you have a Polish beer^Wyellowish fluid's brand umbrella behind you ;D
[21:07] <mhr3> surprise, surprise, it was taken in poland :)
[21:07] <Saviq> yeah, the "stacyjka" name behind you kind of gave it away ;)
[21:07] <mhr3> Lublin ;)
[21:38] <kgunn> elopio: sorry, interenet probs...do you have the bug handy for dash as app silo ?
[21:39] <elopio> kgunn: I haven't reported a bug for it, just mentioned it on the mail thread. Should I file one for you?
[21:40] <kgunn> elopio: it might be helpful to track things...b/c i can not for the life of me repro...i need to double check all the packages etc
[21:59] <elopio> kgunn: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity8/+bug/1352571
[21:59] <elopio> kgunn: please assign it to Daniel. I can't do that.
[22:01] <kgunn> yep thanks elopio