[02:26] <bluesabre> ochosi, Unit193: sounds like a package
[02:27] <Unit193> Hmm?
[02:28] <bluesabre> about a tagged release, and medium importance
[02:29] <Unit193> Ah, it wasn't tagged exactly, just had utopic rather than UNRELEASED.
[02:30] <bluesabre> ah, right
[03:36] <Unit193> Is Andrew still interested in helping out Xubuntu in Debian?
[04:48] <xubuntu688> Can anyone in here help me ? I'm having a lightdm problem.
[07:56] <ochosi> Noskcaj: what's the status of upower0.99 in xubuntu utopic? i've seen you've set session to fix released, so we're carrying that patch from bugzilla and it works?
[08:38] <Noskcaj> ochosi, Session doesn't use upower really.
[08:38] <Noskcaj> but the actual transition will be this month
[08:39] <ochosi> hm ok
[08:39] <ochosi> i thought that for suspend/hibernate it used to use it
[08:54] <Noskcaj> ochosi, One of our patches changed that to logind
[08:55] <ochosi> ah right, we're using the logind patch
[08:55] <ochosi> in that case yeah, no more upower
[09:01] <ochosi> bluesabre: i presume you never received a reply from nick about a settings release?
[10:05] <bluesabre> ochosi: correct
[10:05] <ochosi> okay
[10:06] <ochosi> planning to do the release anyway at some point or do you wanna wait?
[10:07] <bluesabre> not sure what would be "right"
[10:55] <brainwash> ochosi: mark bug 1306898 as invalid (works as intended) or wishlist?
[10:56] <brainwash> looks like it's time again to do some cleanup on launchpad =S
[10:56] <brainwash> or maybe mark as incomplete? damn, what to do.. what to do..
[11:00] <knome> it is not incomplete at least
[11:00] <brainwash> ye, only an upstream report is "missing" :P
[11:04] <brainwash> I thought that cleaning up stuff might help with the bug bounty idea
[11:05] <brainwash> sadly I lost track of the current progress :/
[11:16] <ochosi> brainwash: that one can be closed as invalid
[11:16] <ochosi> you already pointed the person upstream, but it really is fine that way
[11:45] <brainwash> ochosi: alright, done
[11:46] <brainwash> next one bug 1297893
[11:46] <brainwash> xubuntu-default-settings overrides the dpi setting for the xubuntu session (96 dpi)
[11:47] <brainwash> but the normal Xfce session relies on proper auto detection
[11:47] <brainwash> should the Xfce session also just use 96 dpi?
[11:49] <brainwash> it's an upstream thing, but I'm not sure yet if we should redirect it
[11:52] <brainwash> .. or simply patch the xfce4-settings package downstream
[11:56] <brainwash> next!
[11:57] <brainwash> ochosi: do you feel like fixing this bug 1309466 ?
[11:58] <brainwash> maybe it's not even an issue anymore in the new release 1.3.0
[12:33] <ochosi> brainwash: that xfpm bug shouldn't be an issue anymore, and we don't plan on doing a 1.2.0 maintenance release
[12:35] <brainwash> ochosi: ok, can you please close this report
[12:36] <brainwash> any thoughts on the dpi bug?
[12:39] <brainwash> Xubuntu uses 96 dpi by default, so why not use it as default for Xfce? could it cause any trouble?
[12:45] <ochosi> can't set it to wontfix as usual
[12:45] <ochosi> added a comment, that should be enough
[12:45] <ochosi> not sure about the dpi, gotta work now, ttyl
[12:46] <brainwash> thanks, I'll file an upstream report for the dpi one :)
[12:47] <brainwash> so it can be discussed somewhere else and not here :D
[12:50] <bluesabre> related: http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2014/07/fonts-in-current-era.html
[12:50] <bluesabre> heading to work, bbl
[17:00] <ochosi> wb ali1234 
[17:27] <ali1234> hello