[01:16] <lifeless> wgrant: you applied to manage lp on ohloh right?
[01:16] <lifeless> wgrant: (vs I just got trolled by someone random :P)
[06:32] <wgrant> lifeless: I did, thanks.
[06:57] <wgrant> cjwatson: Don't you need to remove --archive=ubuntu from the config file in https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/launchpad-buildd/unhardcode-distribution/+merge/228114?
[06:58] <wgrant> Or are you relying on the second option override the first?
[06:58] <cjwatson> The latter.  Although that strategy is no longer necessary now that the master-side change has been rolled out everywhere.
[06:58] <wgrant> Yeah.
[06:59] <cjwatson> At the time I wasn't sure what the deployment order would be.
[06:59] <cjwatson> Any objection to me nuking the Xen bits of BuilddFixing (i.e. most of it)?
[07:00] <wgrant> cjwatson: Murder.
[07:01] <cjwatson> Looks like builddfizttzer is still marginally useful; it has a small number of non-virt-suitable actions.
[07:01] <cjwatson> builddfitzer, indeed.
[11:30] <wgrant> jelmer: Do you recall if the side-effect that I mention in comment #1 of https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd/+bug/1242796 is deliberate?
[11:49] <jelmer> wgrant: including the epoch in the build directory name was not an intentional change
[11:50] <wgrant> jelmer: It's not quite that. The tree is initially built as TEMPLATE, but then just before the package build it gets renamed to PACKAGE-VERSION as normal.
[11:50] <wgrant> --no-build used to exit after the rename to PACKAGE-VERSION, so it never got renamed back to TEMPLATE.
[11:50] <wgrant> Which meant that 'bzr dailydeb --no-build' used to leave a sensibly named directory.
[11:51] <wgrant> But r158 causes --no-build to just skip the package build -- it still does the rename back to TEMPLATE.
[11:51] <jelmer> oh, right
[11:51] <jelmer> yeah, that's not intentional
[11:52] <wgrant> I didn't think so. Thanks.