[04:56] <pitti> Good morning
[06:18] <darkxst> pitti, hi, can you upload the glib rebuilds for bug 1283551
[06:19] <pitti> darkxst: can do for utopic; for trusty, shoudl this perhaps bump the build dep so that the SRU team doesn't need to carefully watch the publication etc.?
[06:19] <pitti> darkxst: err, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/181632343/glib-typelibs.debdiff ?
[06:19] <ricotz> darkxst, glib2.0 doesn build any typelibs
[06:20] <pitti> darkxst: glib2.0 doesn't ... right
[06:20] <ricotz> g-i is
[06:20] <pitti> darkxst: they are built by gobject-introspection
[06:20] <pitti> so it should already be good
[06:20] <ricotz> darkxst, pitti, hi ;)
[06:20] <pitti> hey ricotz
[06:21] <darkxst> hey ricotz
[06:21] <ricotz> what you want to to get g-i 1.41.5 in, i guess
[06:21] <ricotz> oh i mean 1.41.4
[06:22] <darkxst> ricotz, we have the transfer_ownership patches in utopic atleast
[06:23] <ricotz> i see
[06:24] <darkxst> pitti, oh right, didn't quite expect that! seems the crashes coming in are from people who havent updated
[08:02] <didrocks> popey: hey! do we have a webpage with all the ubuntu click apps?
[08:02] <didrocks> popey: to know how many of them we do have
[08:03] <seb128> didrocks, http://people.canonical.com/~alan/clicks
[08:03] <seb128> no recent import though
[08:04] <didrocks> yeah, getting quite rotten
[08:13] <popey> didrocks: do you mean every click in the store?
[08:14] <popey> https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/click-apps/stats says 457 published apps
[08:23] <didrocks> thanks popey
[09:26] <ochosi> tiheum_: hey, any plans on landing the suru icon theme on the desktop for 14.10? was mostly curious because someone on g+ mentioned that there are concrete plans, but wasn't sure how informed that person really was...
[09:26] <ochosi> (if it is even called "suru")
[09:48] <tiheum> ochosi: atm, we are fully focused on the phone. I started to think how we could port the theme to desktop but we don't have 'concrete plans' yet. We will know more in the course of September.
[09:49] <ochosi> tiheum: okeydokey, thanks for the heads up!
[10:53] <tiheum> Hi guys, we would like to slightly change the way the package of the Suru icon theme is built. Is anyone can help me?
[12:45] <dholbach> hiya
[12:45] <meecoder> hi
[12:45] <dholbach> could somebody take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cairo/+bug/1353362 please?
[12:46] <LocutusOfBorg1> hi
[12:46] <meecoder> hi, i have a bug reporting problem
[12:46] <meecoder> I am trying to file a bug on launchpad but the page just stays the same when I try to submit it. It seems to reload though.
[12:47] <dholbach> meecoder, you could try asking in #launchpad
[12:48] <meecoder> ok, thanks
[20:27] <tedg> So, kenvandine, it seems in dbus-test-runner 0.0.3 you added a dep on gvfs-backends. Do you know why that is?
[20:27] <kenvandine> tedg, i did?
[20:28] <tedg> kenvandine, bzr annotate never lies :-)
[20:28]  * kenvandine hides
[20:28]  * kenvandine doesn't remember... 
[20:28] <tedg> We're trying to track down if it's really needed, as it's breaking things.
[20:28] <kenvandine> the broken archive issue?
[20:29] <kenvandine> it's breaking my builds too
[20:29] <kenvandine> same error
[20:29] <tedg> I wonder if it was for bustle
[20:29] <tedg> Oh, you just added it as a build-dep, I added it as a runtime one :-)
[20:29]  * tedg hides
[20:30] <tedg> With this really informative comment: "debian/control: Adding gvfs-backends as a dependency."
[20:30] <kenvandine> haha
[20:30] <kenvandine> that is so *tedg*
[20:31] <kenvandine> tedg, omg... karmic
[20:32] <kenvandine> i added the build depends because we needed it to execute it's tests :)
[20:32] <kenvandine> tedg, at least my changelog said so :)
[20:32] <tedg> Ha!
[20:32] <kenvandine> tedg, check the NEWS file, that'll help
[20:32] <tedg> kenvandine, NO NEWS IS GOOD NEWS!
[20:33] <kenvandine> tedg, you have no idea how loud i just laughed at my own comment there
[20:33] <tedg> heh
[20:33] <kenvandine> it's been ages since i've been able to tease you about the NEWS file :)
[20:34]  * kenvandine adds calendar reminder to do that more often
[20:34] <kenvandine> tedg, so do you know what is making gvfs-backends uninstallable?
[20:34] <kenvandine> i just assumed it tricked back up to systemd
[20:35] <tedg> kenvandine, Yeah, that's what Saviq thought, but I think that pitti fixed that, so I'm not so sure now.
[20:35] <kenvandine> but that sysvinit dep was fixed a couple hours ago
[20:35] <Saviq> tedg, yeah I'm out of ideas... especially since I could actually install stuff manually
[20:35] <Saviq> tedg, it's just apt resolving that doesn't work
[20:36] <tedg> Let's see what Jenkins thinks of this. https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/dbus-test-runner/drop-gvfs-backends/+merge/229868
[20:36] <kenvandine> tedg, did you try it in pbuilder?
[20:36] <tedg> kenvandine, I did not, but Saviq got it working, and then not based on adding proposed.
[20:37] <tedg> Oh, the gvfs-backends?
[20:37] <kenvandine> tedg, yeah...
[20:37] <kenvandine> i'm quite certain that if i added that as a build depends, it was because the test suite didn't run in pbuilder
[20:37] <Saviq> tedg, there's actually another one https://launchpadlibrarian.net/181682961/buildlog_ubuntu-utopic-amd64.indicator-network_0.5.1%2B14.10.20140806.2-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[20:37] <Saviq> libconnectivity in this case
[20:38] <Saviq> that I didn't even try tracking down yet
[20:38] <tedg> kenvandine, I was thinking Jenkins would effectively do that, so I didn't.
[20:38] <kenvandine> there has to be some common dep there
[20:38] <kenvandine> tedg, i guess it should
[20:38] <kenvandine> but i bet your going to fail :)
[20:39] <tedg> kenvandine, you're
[20:39] <tedg> ;-)
[20:39]  * kenvandine hopes for a win though
[20:39] <kenvandine> geez
[20:39] <kenvandine> yes... yes
[20:41] <kenvandine> Saviq, so what does dbus-test-runner and libconnectivity-cpp0 have in common?
[20:41] <Saviq> tedg, kenvandine, if you can explain this: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7973532/
[20:43] <tedg> Hmm, my guess would be that apt's decision tree got too deep. But, I thought it threw an error there.
[20:44] <kenvandine> grr
[20:44] <kenvandine> yeah... some apt screwiness
[20:45] <Saviq> kenvandine, tedg, yeah, pam and systemd are at the root of it
[20:45] <Saviq> erm s/pam/policykit/
[20:46] <Saviq> as soon as I put systemd and policykit on the explicit install line, stuff's resolving again
[20:47] <Saviq> basically the same thing for indicator-network http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7973573/
[21:08] <kenvandine> Saviq, tedg: i don't know wtf is up here...
[21:12] <Saviq> yeah me neither :|
[21:13] <kenvandine> :/
[21:13] <kenvandine> what a frustrating day
[21:21] <kenvandine> tedg, Saviq: systemd is still stuck in proposed, must have something to do with it
[21:22] <Saviq> kenvandine, well... the issue only shows *with* proposed, though
[21:22] <kenvandine> adt-run [18:49:10]: ERROR: unexpected error: test dependencies are unsatisfiable
[21:22] <Saviq> kenvandine, which the silo PPAs do use
[21:22] <kenvandine> yeah
[21:22] <kenvandine> systemd isn't getting promoted because of a depends failure in an autopkgtest
[21:22] <kenvandine> https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/utopic-adt-udisks2/ARCH=amd64,label=adt/49/console
[21:23] <kenvandine> that's blocking systemd going to release
[21:23] <Saviq> kenvandine, well, yeah, but how's that matter if you do have systemd, think apt does not resolve across pockets?
[21:23] <Saviq> s/have systemd/have proposed/
[21:23] <kenvandine> well whatever is causing the failure is causing this problem
[21:25] <Saviq> kenvandine, anything springs to mind http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/utopic/udisks2/utopic/view/head:/debian/tests/control ?
[21:26] <kenvandine> policykit-1 i bet
[21:26] <kenvandine> looks closestt
[21:26] <kenvandine> but probably something it depends on
[21:26] <Saviq> kenvandine, yeah
[21:27] <Saviq> kenvandine, policykit-1 you can't install from proposed without putting libpam-systemd on the same install line
[21:27] <Saviq> so same issue, feels like a chicken'n'egg one
[21:27] <kenvandine> yeah, so apt resolution is not able to handle it
[21:27] <kenvandine> yeah
[21:28] <kenvandine> dunno why though
[21:28] <kenvandine> the only upload today related seems to be systemd
[21:28]  * kenvandine is puzzled
[21:33] <Saviq> kenvandine, so yeah, systemd won't migrate 'cause it won't install (maybe) because it won't migrate, 'cause it won't install, (maybe) because it won't migrate, 'cause it won't install... shall I go on?
[21:33]  * Saviq builds a local copy of systemd
[21:38] <tedg> kenvandine, review: https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/dbus-test-runner/drop-gvfs-backends/+merge/229868
[21:38] <tedg> Might not fix the overall issue, but can't hurt.
[21:38] <tedg> (well, probably won't hurt)
[21:39] <tedg> :-)
[21:39] <tedg> Guessing it was a gtk2 thing
[21:58] <Saviq> kenvandine, I built systemd myself, and it magically works
[21:58] <Saviq> kenvandine, with a local repo I mean
[21:59] <Saviq> so something must really be weird between release and proposed in apt's resolution