[03:50] <slangasek> bdmurray, infinity, stgraber: ^^ urgent-ish fix for a precise->trusty upgrade issue
[03:51] <RAOF> slangasek: Want me to take a look?
[03:51] <slangasek> RAOF: sure :)
[03:53] <RAOF> Yeah, that looks urgentish :)
[03:54]  * stgraber was just about to look at it
[03:55] <slangasek> ta
[13:37] <arges> jamespage: i can take a look today
[13:37] <arges> re: openstack packages
[13:37] <jamespage> arges, ++ thanks
[13:48] <michagogo> arges: fyi, the bitcoin SRU should hit 7 days in about 3 hours
[13:49] <arges> michagogo: ok i'll take a look this afternoon then
[13:49] <michagogo> And it has a second bug mentioned on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html, apparently from a previous SRU that was dropped because it never got verified
[13:49] <michagogo> Since this SRU is to remove the package, it's safe to ignore the second bu
[13:49] <michagogo> g
[13:49] <arges> michagogo: yea i adjusted that already
[14:08] <michagogo> arges: Ah, great. Thanks!
[14:47] <arges> jamespage: re: cinder upload. I noticed that the changelog versions have been re-written, wondering why that was. but it may be more of a question for coreycb
[14:47] <jamespage> arges, that's a mistake if so - I though we had that resolved - let me look
[14:48] <jamespage> arges, please reject that - well resolve
[14:48] <arges> jamespage: danke
[14:49] <arges> jamespage: also look at the ChangeLog file looks like that got edited a bit
[14:51] <arges> jamespage:ok rejected
[14:58] <arges> jamespage: neutron appears to be suffering from the same changelog issues
[14:59] <arges> i'll let you take alook before i reject it
[15:02] <jamespage> arges, revised cinder uploaded
[15:06] <jamespage> arges, reject neutron pls - have a fixed changelog version
[15:06] <arges> jamespage: will do
[16:08] <michagogo> arges: looks like it changed over
[16:31] <arges> michagogo: ok done
[16:33] <michagogo> arges: TYVM!
[18:50] <arges> jamespage: coreycb : please re-upload neutron. there were some odd changelog issues
[18:52] <coreycb> arges, ok, I think james is going to have to do that
[18:56] <arges> coreycb: also for nova why is nova-2014.1.1/debian/patches/Fixes-rdb-backend-image-size.patch dropped, but its not explained in the changelog?
[19:03] <coreycb> arges, that's a mistake in the changelog.  the patch was dropped because it's fixed upstream.  we can re-upload nova to fix that.
[19:16] <jamespage> arges, coreycb: neutron re-uploaded with corrected changelog
[19:16] <coreycb> jamespage, thanks.  see the nova issue?
[19:17] <jamespage> coreycb, want to update the changelog and propose? I'll review later or tomorrow AM
[19:17] <coreycb> jamespage, sure, will do
[19:53] <coreycb> jamespage, here's the nova mp -- https://code.launchpad.net/~corey.bryant/nova/2014.1.2/+merge/230538