[00:36] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/TestCaseFormat#contribute Should I post this to the mailing list? Because it looks a bit wonky to me, unless the html is supposed to be showing? [00:37] Or is that an entirely different problem that doesn't involve Ubuntu QA? [00:44] no_mu, That's ubuntu Qa stuff [00:45] Noskcaj, So I'll post it in the Ubuntu QA mailing list then [00:45] yes thanks [00:45] But hat's not html [00:45] *that's [00:45] that's meant to be here [00:46] Oh, I didn't know. I thought it was supposed to be formatted properly. ^.^; [00:47] On the web page, that is [00:50] no_mu, It's to show the formatting of the testcases [00:51] Yep, I see it now, sorry about that. [00:55] It's fine. It's good to see new people here [01:25] Noskcaj: Now I'm wondering about what it means to "run" an ISO.. [01:46] Noskcaj, Run it in a VM or on a real computer [01:47] Since an iso is an image of a cd that can be used to install the operating system [01:50] Ah okay [01:50] Thanks [02:26] hmm this is very strange I am getting a message that my offset is not right if I put a partition at the end for manual partitioning of my external hard drive and get told to recreate with same settings and it will have better performance but nothing changes for a lubuntu amd64 dialy build doing manual partitioning === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [11:34] Do I have to link my hardware in an iso Virtualbox test? [11:40] Nothing_Much: what do you mean? [11:42] I'm testing out this thing: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/315/builds/75608/testcases/1499/results and so far it almost passed (failed) with the black screen bug there. [11:42] elfy: ^ [11:42] Is the hardware profile required in this sort of test? [11:43] in this test result* [11:43] I don't use them at all - but if you want to put it there you can [11:44] So it's optional for iso testing, that's all I was asking [11:48] yep - just needed to be sure what you meant :) [11:50] Awesome! Well, my testcase result is up there now [11:50] :) [12:22] Hmm.. apparently those green bugs are extremely minor, so I'll probably edit that bug to a pass since it didn't really break anything, just hindered the startup process which was fixed with alt + F-anything [12:27] It still shows the bug as just affecting me Nothing_Much, did you click "This bug affects me" in green at the top of the bug report? [12:31] average_guy: On Launchpad? [12:31] yes https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1356437 [12:31] Ubuntu bug 1356437 in debian-installer (Ubuntu) "blank screen after install netboot" [Undecided,New] [12:32] oh cool, so it's confirmed now! [12:32] :) [12:32] To add to that, it also helps to do a hard reset to make GRUB show up as well. [12:33] if you wanted to, that is [13:09] A bug during the reset after installationshould be using "ubuntu-bug syslinux" right? [13:10] *installation should [13:10] Or would it be xorg? [13:19] Or maybe it's just Virtualbox [13:20] On my host [13:20] So I'll give this one a pass then [16:15] Testcase: Install (auto-resize) Should specify that a popup "Write previous changes to disk and continue?" appears after the "Install Now" button is clicked. [16:22] that popup is expected - and also turns up when not expected - not a fail testcase cause though [21:18] So apparently I need to figure out how to use Samba on Virtualbox [21:41] Anybody know how to set up Samba for shares for TC-NFM-005? [21:42] No wait, hold up [21:42] It's TC-NFM-010 [21:42] Nothing_Much: ask in #ubuntu [21:42] phillip: Will do