[10:35] <darkxst> can someone promote tracker to main? didrocks was going to do it, but havent seen him for a while!
[10:35] <darkxst> bug 1313996
[10:37] <darkxst> (needed for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/1:3.10.1-0ubuntu13)
[12:31] <darkxst> infinity, ^^^ can you promote tracker?
[13:55] <rtg> arges, tboot has been languishing in the Trusty unapproved queue since 7/31. Could you have a look at it ?
[13:55] <arges> rtg: sure
[14:00] <arges> rtg: ok so looks like a security/bugfix-mostly update so that's good
[14:00] <arges> rtg: however, the changelog is messed up as it has utopic entries in it for a trusty release. Can you make it one entry that explains all teh changes in one
[14:00] <rtg> utopic ? doh!
[14:01] <arges> rtg: in addition fix_grub-mkconfig_version.patch was dropped. can you mention why this is ok in teh changelog too
[14:02] <doko> stgraber, ScottK: please overwrite the libaunit autopkg test. it was demoted to -proposed, and shouldn't block glibc
[14:40] <rtg> arges, tboot resubmitted with requested changes
[14:40] <arges> rtg: ack
[14:53] <gaughen> slangasek, arges, infinity - who do I bug to find out if a ffe is likely to get approved?  rbasak filed one for bcache
[14:57] <doko> stgraber, ScottK, infinity slangasek: please overwrite the libaunit autopkg test. it was demoted to -proposed, and shouldn't block glibc
[14:58] <doko> stgraber, ScottK, infinity slangasek: please overwrite the bzr autopkg test to unblock glibc
[15:03] <slangasek> gaughen: bug #?
[15:04] <arges> rtg: ok, a few more comments (should have caught this earlier) the hg_archival.patch can you fill in the rest of the template. Also you drop /fix-werror-format.patch but that doesn't line up with what teh changelog says.
[15:41] <rtg> arges, once more into the breach...
[15:45] <arges> rtg: ok i'll look at in a second
[15:45] <gaughen> slangasek, 1355890 is the bug
[15:46] <gaughen> slangasek, we'll have a test plan ready to share by end of day today
[15:55] <arges> rtg: looks good .. accepted
[15:55] <rtg> arges, thanks
[16:00] <slangasek> gaughen: an FFe doesn't require an extensive test plan
[16:00] <gaughen> slangasek, well I just wanted to let you know it was out there
[16:00] <slangasek> ok :)
[16:00] <gaughen> and would be available soon
[16:00] <gaughen> but good to know