[02:04] === trainguard: IMAGE 199 building (started: 20140819 02:05) === === fginther is now known as fginther` === _salem is now known as salem_ [03:39] === trainguard: IMAGE 199 DONE (finished: 20140819 03:40) === [03:39] === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/199.changes === === sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens [03:59] 1morning [04:00] so it should be #199 that will show better results, hopefully [04:02] good 19th [04:03] hopefully soon ending good 18th to you [04:03] "the sooner you assign to me that silo, the better", I guess [04:04] Mirv: it's the 19th here now too :-P [04:04] Mirv: if you assign it soon; I'll get through it soon :-) [04:04] yeah :) already did, landing-008 [04:09] ty [04:28] rsalveti: the branches would need to be approved https://code.launchpad.net/~rsalveti/ubuntu-touch-session/update_touch_pa_add_voicecall_volume/+merge/231289 + https://code.launchpad.net/~rsalveti/telepathy-ofono/set_default_voicecall_volume/+merge/231290 [04:29] although you usually land your own stuff anyway, but just noticed from the queuebot [04:30] Mirv: yup, just got the silo before asking people to review/test [04:54] rsalveti: right, there's just "Testing pass" preselected, that's why I checked [04:55] thanks :) [04:55] Mirv: oh, my mistake [04:55] thanks [05:39] Mirv: something is busted with this silo, I pushed a new rev to my telepathy-ofono MR, tried a rebuild and it didn't get the new rev [05:39] tried a force rebuild and still nothing [05:40] it still tried to upload the src package with the same version as the one it is already available (from a previous build) [05:40] rsalveti: it does say it took rev 99 at https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-002-1-build/8/console [05:41] Uploading telepathy-ofono_0.2+14.10.20140819-0ubuntu1_source.changes: done. [05:42] Mirv: ^ still the same version id as the older one already available in the ppa [05:42] for some reason it didn't add the .1 [05:42] oh, it's not increasing it and so the upload (silently) fails [05:42] yeah [05:43] rsalveti: robru has fixed some versioning things 5h ago :) [05:43] hm [05:43] Mirv, rsalveti nope nope nope nope [05:43] nothing is fixed [05:43] it's all broken [05:43] broke broke broke [05:43] lol [05:43] hehe [05:44] Just got back from dinner, still looking into this [05:44] initial experiments failed [05:44] ok then [05:45] something in the RTM changes broke the bit of code that knows to add .1 on rebuilds [05:45] rsalveti: if you need it quickly, I can fix it for you by getting the branch, manually fixing the changelog from the PPA, and doing it as a direct upload (plus manual merge afterwards) [05:45] fixing it to not add '+rtm+rtm+rtm' is pretty trivial but then you get identical version numbers that fail uploads, still figuring why .1 is missing [05:45] Mirv, rsalveti: wait what are you seeing? I thought only rtm was affected by this. [05:46] robru: so, https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-002-1-build/8/console tried to upload with the same version number that is already in the PPA [05:46] robru: no, this is for ubuntu [05:46] Mirv: but wonder if that will cause even more issues :-) [05:46] telepathy-ofono 0.2+14.10.20140819-0ubuntu1 [05:46] and you were expecting 19.1? [05:46] yup [05:47] robru: yes, since 19 is already there, so in practice the upload failed [05:47] ok, that's the same as I saw in rtm. [05:47] will dig [05:48] rsalveti: there's no problem as long as I don't get swamped with such requests. it's just manually doing what CI train does. [05:48] but we can also just wait [05:49] Mirv: mind doing that upload then (at least for now), want to get tiago to test/review this silo tomorrow morning [05:50] there's a really annoying issue that is happening quite frequently with the latest images that makes me unable to launch apps [05:50] even with latest [05:55] (not really, will relaunch watch only build after the manual upload is published there properly) [05:56] and with this, we can even switch back to the normal MP method and see if .2 appears after CI Train is fixed [06:07] Mirv, rsalveti ok the version stuff should be fixed, can you please try an upload? [06:15] Mirv, rsalveti if you do run a build job, please check the DEBUG flag, I added a bunch of debugging messages to help figure out what's going on with the versioning. [06:20] robru: ok, I'll reconfigure it back to using MP and try another rebuild [06:23] Mirv, paste me the build log when it starts please ;-) [06:25] robru: building https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-002-1-build/11/console [06:25] looks correct, .2 now there! === salem_ is now known as _salem [06:33] Mirv, sweet, thanks, debug output looks sane too [06:36] yes, it's building all good https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-002/+packages [06:36] thanks! [06:40] Mirv, you're welcome [07:03] what is the bug # for the 'app fails to launch' issue? I reproduced it with the reverted version of u-a-l 0.4+14.10.20140808.2.is.0.4+14.10.20140808.2-0ubuntu1 [07:22] omg, network outage === Mirv_ is now known as Mirv [07:24] jibel: LP: #gookistan 1357252 [07:24] I mean [07:24] sil2100, :) found it thanks [07:25] Ugh, why 'gookistan' o_O ?! [07:25] * sil2100 doesn't understand his pastebin [07:29] Saviq: ah, the workaround doesn't seem to have worked :/ (or is a different crash) [07:31] jibel, hah [07:34] CRAP! [07:34] tvoss, jibel: I think the revert was wrong [07:34] tvoss, jibel: I think it didn't really revert ANYTHING [07:34] F**K [07:35] I screwed it [07:35] ARGH [07:35] sil2100, the u-a-l revert? [07:35] Yes [07:35] sil2100, ? [07:35] sil2100, you didn't revert it at all, or made it worse ? [07:35] indeed, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/182632645/ubuntu-app-launch_0.4%2B14.10.20140808.2-0ubuntu1_0.4%2B14.10.20140808.2.is.0.4%2B14.10.20140808.2-0ubuntu1.diff.gz [07:35] Didn't revert it at all [07:35] brendand: just no revert, a no-change rebuild [07:36] sil2100, ok don't panic [07:37] I'm not panicing, I'm just really really pissed at myself [07:38] This reveerter script doesn't really work as it should [07:38] we have plenty of other blockers, so time-wise it's not any problem [07:42] sil2100, how does reversion work? don't we just delete the newest version from the archive? [07:42] brendand: no, you can't do that, we need to upload a new version that's just like the old one [07:42] sil2100, the results are not that bad today - 97.7% [07:42] But now I bloated it with a useless version [07:45] sil2100, good news - camera-app is better now :) [07:52] brendand: and messaging/dialer! [07:55] ogra_: will have to ask you for a re-upload of ubuntu-app-launch :< [07:56] ogra_: http://people.canonical.com/~lzemczak/packaging/ :< [07:57] ogra_: pretty please with cherries on top [07:57] hmm, did we do anything specifically for dialer and messaging ? [07:57] they got massively better [07:58] ogra_: I believe it's the telephony-service [07:58] ogra_: 199 had a ofono landing that might have helped [07:58] k [07:58] I mean, telephony-service [07:59] :) [07:59] it's starting to look bearable again [07:59] sil2100, i get a 403 for .dsc, .diff.gz and .changes [07:59] (fix the permissions please) [08:00] uh, wth [08:02] ogra_: should be ok now I guess? [08:07] sil2100, uploaded [08:07] (if you didnt get mail yet) [08:09] sil2100, so tvoss just asked me for the recent trust store crashes ... [08:09] sil2100, there are none !!! [08:09] 199 seems to be crash free wrt trust store ... [08:09] ogra_: thank you, and sorry for the wrong packageyesterday ;/ [08:09] OH! [08:09] \o/ [08:09] np [08:10] ogra_, sil2100 I still would like to retrace the previous crash file [08:11] tvoss, default, camera ... webbrowser ... pick one of them and scroll down http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/utopic/touch/mako/197:20140818:20140811.1/9753/ [09:17] sil2100: looking at the bug it looks like Saviq is looking at the clock out of sync [09:17] Saviq: when you look at that wifi is out of sync too, I told me I was connected to my home network 12 miles away last night, now I know my router has a good reach but that would be stretching it a bit [09:23] davmor2: but that's just the unity8 bits probably, right? [09:23] good morning [09:23] davmor2: the indicator most probably also needs its own fix [09:24] our infamous silo 13 is blocked in -proposed because of an ap test issue [09:24] what's best to unblock that: rebuild silo13 and repush? [09:24] sil2100: Saviq is awesome make him fix it all, it'll work then honest :) [09:25] I guess we have limited Saviq resources :< [09:25] davmor2, sil2100, sounds like the same issue [09:25] dednick is looking into it [09:26] dbarth: because of an ap issue? [09:27] sil2100: ap test failing [09:28] dbarth: which silo is it? And what packages? Since I don't see anything migrating in CI Train right now [09:29] sil2100: it was silo 13, now gone [09:29] sil2100: package is: ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts [09:30] * sil2100 checks [09:30] it had to be manually acked because of arch-dependent things [09:30] i guess if we silo the fix real quick it can trigger a new upload request to unblock the previous one [09:30] i just wanted to verify to avoid accumulating errors which would be harder to fix later on [09:31] dbarth: but I see it in utopic already, it doesn't look stuck in -proposed [09:31] pitti pinged me this moning about it [09:31] Or is it causing some other package to get stuck? [09:31] ah maybe [09:31] well, you know what, i'll just silo the fix [09:31] and that should work [09:32] Yeah ;) [09:32] I think it's the simplest and best way [09:35] ok [09:58] jodh, I added some info to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-app-launch/+bug/1357252/comments/17 with cgmanager in debug mode if it helps [09:58] Ubuntu bug 1357252 in cgmanager (Ubuntu) "Upstart jobs specifying cgroup fail to start occasionally" [Undecided,Confirmed] [09:59] jibel: yes, thanks. saw that. === psivaa changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Ubuntu CI Engineering Team | CI Train support: trainguards | Vanguard (general help): psivaa | CI Train Status: #179 promoted | CI Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | Known issues: citrain struggles with source packages, don't WATCH_ONLY until *after* the source is built in PPA. http://youtu.be/-Rnw0D2AdYU [10:12] OK, back from holiday, trawling through mail. How are we looking for the RTM branch refresh? [10:15] cjwatson, no promoted image still [10:16] cjwatson: so, no promoted image sadly... but the infrastructure seems ok (besides the +rtm bug that's a bit annoying still, but it's just a bug with rebuilds and will be fixed) [10:16] Whoa, we haven't had a promoted image since I left? Wow. [10:16] cjwatson: we have 3 blockers left basically [10:16] cjwatson: yeah ;/ [10:16] cjwatson: I'll be switching TRAINCON-0 in a moment, as we anyway slowed down landings already [10:17] Well, I wasn't going to be able to refresh the branch until we get a Launchpad deployment, so that I can avoid spamming uploaders with copy notices; but that sounds like I may not be able to do it today [10:18] Guess I'll check with managers when possible === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch [11:00] * sil2100 out for lunch o/ [11:11] cihelp: s-jenkins down? [11:11] jgdx: i just accessed it [11:12] jgdx: yeah, working here. What are you seeing? [11:12] psivaa, ev, webpage not available [11:13] which I think means I am on the network [11:13] jgdx: for a specific job or for the root URL? [11:13] ev, http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/ubuntu-system-settings-ci/1243/ [11:13] oh and the root url [11:13] yeah, it's there [11:13] you're presumably not on the VPN [11:15] ev, right, rebooting [11:18] ev, reboot fixed it. === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow [12:01] psivaa: I wonder if it would be possible to do more than a single build in the UITK autolanding http://10.98.3.13:8080/job/ubuntu-sdk-team-ubuntu-ui-toolkit-staging-autolanding/ [12:02] bzoltan1: more than a single build? [12:03] psivaa: we have 41 active branches, half of them could build in few ten minutes and we could land a good bunch of fixes and improvement. Now it looks, that even after the applauncher is back in business it literally takes days to get the MRs landed on the staging. [12:04] psivaa: I mean Mirv has triggered about 5-7 MRs build, but I see only one. Are the others queuing? [12:04] bzoltan1: ohh, understand. [12:04] psivaa: :) I am not sure if I understand how this works :) maybe I am asking silly questions... would not be the first time [12:07] bzoltan1: i dont see any of the -autolanding jobs in the queue.. only see a couple of -ci 's in the building state. === cprov changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Ubuntu CI Engineering Team | CI Train support: trainguards | Vanguard (general help): cprov | CI Train Status: #179 promoted | CI Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | Known issues: citrain struggles with source packages, don't WATCH_ONLY until *after* the source is built in PPA. http://youtu.be/-Rnw0D2AdYU [12:09] bzoltan1: as per whether we can have multiple -autolanding jobs in parellel, i think fginther` would be able to give you a better answer [12:10] my feeling is that it might cause some conflicts [12:12] psivaa: Theoretically it could, but if they would conflict then the conflict would be there in sequential landing order too... a conflict is conflict regardless of parallel or sequential landing order === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch [12:19] trainguards: could I get a silo for spreadsheet line 13 please? [12:20] bzoltan1: yea, agree, but I wasn't only talking about text conflicts.. not entirely sure how MP's are proposed for UITK to decide if it'd cause any other issues :). so leaving it to fginther` :) [12:23] psivaa: the code base is getting quite large and we are only 3 people and we know who is working on what, so while conflicts are not impossible, they are not common [12:30] t1mp: ack, will raise it in the meeting today [12:34] greyback_: done === _salem is now known as salem_ === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g [12:59] sil2100, what happened to that image you wanted to build ? [13:10] Hi guys! [13:10] sil2100 here, due to some car problems Im stuck in the city for some time [13:11] With only my phone handy [13:11] silDroid, tsk, use ubuntu ! [13:11] Just so you know that it might take a while since Im back at my PC again :/ [13:12] silDroid, i just pinged your other account, what happened to the image you wanted to build [13:12] Hey, on ubuntu I wouldnt able to give you guys a sign! [13:12] why ? just use the kiwi IRC client ;) [13:12] wroks fine as long as you dont put it in the background for to long [13:13] So, Ive been waiting for some input from the unity8 guys on the locker merge [13:13] Yeah, but I would have to install it first! [13:13] I have limited data here, eating up my payphone money [13:14] * ogra_ adds it to the seed ... with a note that silDroid will write a test suite for it [13:14] Not sure what happened with that merge, but I guess its best to just kick a new image [13:14] *g* [13:14] Hah! [13:14] ogra_: cpuld you kick a new image now maybe? As its getting latish anyway [13:14] yeah [13:14] doing [13:15] Ok, I go back to changing my tire, see you soon [13:15] o/ [13:23] Mirv: I need advice. Job failed with https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-016-1-build/5/console - is it because I made a debian/changelog entry specifying the utopic series? [13:23] https://code.launchpad.net/~gerboland/unity-api/surfaceSizerCallback/+merge/230270 is the MR in question [13:24] === trainguard: IMAGE 200 building (started: 20140819 13:25) === [13:25] 200 *\o/* [13:25] ) [13:25] :) [13:26] 200 images and not a single green one this release cycle ... [13:26] thats a record ... (not a good one sadly) [13:27] sil2100: is this the image with the revert and additional fixes in place? [13:28] davmor2, only the revert i fear [13:28] sil2100: and is this the image you would like om26er to start dogfooding? [13:28] and some "normal" distro landings (udisks, apport) [13:28] ogra_: meh that's not so good :( [13:28] greyback_: yes, should be s/utopic/UNRELEASED/ [13:29] davmor2, i think we are still waiting for a unity8 fix or so [13:29] davmor2, see backlog, sil2100 is busy changing a tire [13:29] oh yeah] [13:32] Mirv: figured, thanks [13:39] psivaa, bzoltan1, -autolanding jobs are executed in serial to prevent logical conflicts. MPs A and B can pass independently and both merge cleanly, but the combination of A+B may cause tests or builds to fail. === tvoss is now known as tvoss|test [14:14] bfiller: you around? [14:15] davmor2: yes, on call [14:20] fginther`: psivaa: in that case we need to make the builds faster. This build http://10.98.3.13:8080/job/ubuntu-sdk-team-ubuntu-ui-toolkit-staging-autolanding/367/ is running for 4 hours already. With 10-12 MRs in queue that means 2-3 days before I can start landing on Utopic [14:20] fginther`: psivaa: and that is horror. === cprov changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Ubuntu CI Engineering Team | CI Train support: trainguards | Vanguard (general help): fginther | CI Train Status: #179 promoted | CI Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | Known issues: citrain struggles with source packages, don't WATCH_ONLY until *after* the source is built in PPA. http://youtu.be/-Rnw0D2AdYU [14:23] bzoltan1: do you do any internal parallelisation in the test suite? [14:24] jdstrand: if you're around, can you explicitly say "approve" to https://code.launchpad.net/~jpakkane/mediascanner2/apparmorfix/+merge/230977 ? [14:27] cjwatson: no, we do not [14:27] Mirv: it looks like it is all done? === alan_g is now known as alan_g|tea [14:27] Status: Approved [14:27] jdstrand: yes, but not by a core-dev (like you), and it's a packaging change :) so say "ack" [14:27] bzoltan1, the biggest issue appears to be the mako testing, when it gets backed up, bad things happen all around, especially for uitk [14:27] Mirv: done [14:28] jdstrand: thanks [14:28] bzoltan1, I'm assuming removing this test would not be a good solution? [14:31] sil2100: I released a couple of isolated, small and good sounding fixes to mediascanner2 (remove one apparmor restriction), webbrowser (bug fix, and webbrowser fixes have had a very good track record), and notify-osd autopkgtest change [14:32] sil2100: I also finished the patched qtdeclarative testing and all AP:s + manual testing, but I'll leave it to you/robru to decide if you can have it before traincon-0 or not === tvoss|test is now known as tvoss === alan_g|tea is now known as alan_g === om26er is now known as om26er|away [14:50] trainguard: can I get a reconfigure of silo16, needed to add qtmir/gles twin [14:53] greyback_: hi! Sure [14:53] sil2100, did we have any major regressions in 199 worth mentioning? [14:53] sil2100: thanks :) [14:56] greyback_: hah, had problems finding your silo-line, someone sabotaged your line on the spreadsheet ;) [14:56] the cheek! [14:56] Mirv: thanks! [15:01] brendand: not really, nothing visible at least... [15:02] davmor2: so, #200 would be a dogfooding candidate I would say, yes [15:03] sil2100: yeah it will be me hitting it with hammers, om26er|away had to disappear but will be back latter and take over. so as soon as it lands I'll kill it with fire........erm I meant test it honest [15:15] sil2100: i messed up my silo 6, can you help me clean it? [15:15] sil2100: i would just like to keep the webapp-override branch, but the ppa contains something else which i can't seem to get rid of [15:15] dbarth: hey! What's up? [15:16] hi [15:16] Oh [15:16] Looking [15:16] just asking you because you were last to talk on the chan [15:16] sorry ;) [15:18] uh, right, interesting [15:18] Even though the build happened, I don't see your upload in the PPA [15:19] sil2100: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-006/+packages [15:19] has an old version + oSoMoN has a silo with same component, slated for landing right now [15:20] sil2100, argh. looks like #200 failed to build [15:20] so mine is next in line but may be caught in a crossfire [15:20] dbarth: exactly, that's the old version, the new one did not appear in the PPA [15:20] sil2100: right, it got kicked out [15:20] ogra_: wait, what? How? [15:20] https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-006-1-build/4/console === salem_ is now known as _salem [15:21] dbarth: let me delete and re-try [15:21] cjwatson, hmm, are there issues with debootstrap atm ? [15:21] sil2100, dbarth: there’s no need to rebuild in silo 6 until silo 10 has fully landed [15:22] oSoMoN: so we're still waiting for silo 10, yes? [15:22] Ah, right, it's not m&c'd [15:22] sil2100, yes, and then we will rebuild silo 6 and attempt to land it [15:23] sorry my silo request is nagging. it seems someone deleted the description, so I just pasted it back [15:23] dbarth, oSoMoN: ok, then let's wait with the test rebuild when silo 10 lands - if it will still cause trouble then I'll revisit [15:23] http://paste.ubuntu.com/8089733/ [15:24] sil2100: ok [15:25] oh, thats the same error cjwatson pointed out before in another channel [15:25] pete-woods: the RTM-sync landing? [15:25] "possibly the package package is at fault" [15:25] pete-woods: but it's for utopic, right? [15:25] ogra_: package package? [15:25] yeah [15:25] :) [15:25] sil2100: yes [15:26] sil2100: I misunderstood the process and landed something straight to RTM yesterday. so today I have to sync it to utopic [15:26] pete-woods: ah ;) Ok, right, 2 things regarding that: [15:27] pete-woods: 1) yes, as you know the normal way is first utopic, then backport to rtm [15:27] pete-woods: 2) no worries! The RTM packages will be now cleared and it will start off clean [15:27] :D [15:27] pete-woods: so most probably you'll have to re-land that for RTM anyway ;p [15:27] cool [15:27] ogra_: yeah, I just punted to slangasek [15:27] cjwatson, any idea what that is ? [15:27] oSoMoN: ^ [15:28] pete-woods: anyway, assigning a silo for you in a moment [15:28] (just out of curiosity) [15:28] ogra_: something to do with the latest util-linux merge I think, but the reason I punted is that I don't understand insserv well enough to have an exact diagnosis myself :) [15:28] sil2100: thanks! [15:28] ah, great, thanks [15:28] pete-woods: how did the RTM process work out for you otherwise? [15:28] sil2100, excellent, I’ll M&C now [15:29] cjwatson: all good other than the add-apt tool [15:29] pete-woods: right, we have asana tasks for that ... had forgotten it would bite the citrain tool which I guess is where you ran into it [15:29] ogra_: re ubuntu-phone, did I miscommunicate something somewhere that implied we would be doing ongoing auto-syncs? [15:29] cjwatson: yep. but other than that it all went smoothly :) === gatox is now known as gatox_lunch [15:29] pete-woods: excellent, thanks [15:30] ogra_: (BTW I committed a fix for debootstrap's unhelpful message upstream) [15:30] cjwatson, well, no, i assumed rtm would behave towards ubuntu like ubuntu behaves towards debian ... (and we sould use something like an SRU process for syncing bits in) [15:30] s/sould/would/ [15:31] ogra_: I guess that's sort of true if you consider Debian import freeze to be this week :) [15:31] right, my assumption was you always push to ubuntu and then sync into rtm [15:31] but seems i got that the wrong way round :) [15:32] no, that's the right way round [15:32] but we will generally be relanding via citrain rather than syncing as such [15:32] ogra_: first ubuntu, then rtm ;) [15:32] ah [15:32] there was my knowledge gap :) [15:32] maybe for non-citrain uploads it may work out easier to sync with binaries, in some limited circumstances [15:33] we do have proposed-migration, so it's possible, but we would have to work out how to QA things [15:33] I guess we could assign a silo, copy-with-binaries into it, then land [15:34] i would also have expected the "traditional" touch arches to just stay with ubuntu [15:34] though i understand we need a reference for the new arches [15:34] how do you mean by traditional arches? [15:34] with the same codebase [15:34] nexus line [15:34] vs the upcoming arches [15:35] well, we'll still be building mako etc. from devel [15:35] I don't care what people use there, but we need to fork all the same code so it makes no difference to me :) [15:35] right, but we likely wont really look at it much [15:37] heh, looks like the first kdubs fallout ... https://plus.google.com/+JonathanCorbet/posts/Q4HvGmPGjPs [15:37] *kdbus [15:37] charles: hey! [15:37] charles: so, just so I get things clear - the two blockers regarding time being out of sync and similar are not indicator-datetime issues? [15:38] charles: since I see a merge from dednick there, but just wanted to make sure it fixes all the issues for both the indicator and the welcome screen [15:38] dednick: ^ ? [15:38] ogra_: which is fine ... but I expect it'll be useful for QA all the same, since not everyone has the new platforms [15:39] right, thats what i meant with "i understand we need a reference" [15:39] sil2100: yes. but still working on it [15:58] four whole free silos? nudge, wink, etc :) [16:00] sil2100: oSoMoN confirms that his silo landed, so can i haz a silo 6 clean up please? === Ursinha changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Ubuntu CI Engineering Team | CI Train support: trainguards | Vanguard (general help): Ursinha | CI Train Status: #179 promoted | CI Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | Known issues: citrain struggles with source packages, don't WATCH_ONLY until *after* the source is built in PPA. http://youtu.be/-Rnw0D2AdYU [16:01] or Ursinha maybe? ^^ see just above [16:04] dbarth: I think that would be a trainguards job [16:04] ok nw [16:04] any trainguards around who can hlp me? [16:05] dbarth, one sec, we're all in a meeting [16:07] dbarth, can’t you trigger a rebuild of silo 6? wouldn’t that work? [16:13] oSoMoN: i tried already [16:13] i think that's fixed now, i saw the dashboard moving [16:14] is 200 out already? [16:15] rsalveti, you didnt listen in the standup :P [16:15] rsalveti, builds are screwed [16:15] ogra_: nops, sorry [16:15] ogra_: oh, great [16:15] 200 failed [16:15] we're waiting for a fixed util-linux and will have to try again then [16:15] oh =\ [16:15] yeah [16:16] smells like traincon might happen before 200 actually [16:16] that was another huge sync [16:16] yay, perfect time for lunch I guess then [16:16] :-) [16:16] for a week off i guess [16:16] :) [16:16] that might also work [16:16] pete-woods: can you take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/mediascanner2/+bug/1358275 please? bfiller ← is the bug you mentioned earlier. [16:16] Ubuntu bug 1358275 in Ubuntu Music App "SongsModel.status is not set as MediaStatus.Ready if rowCount is zero" [Undecided,New] [16:18] popey: err. I'd have to forward you on to either jamesh or Satoris [16:18] ok, will poke them. [16:18] :) [16:21] trainguards: sorry to nag again about my silo request (line 33), but I'd really like to get this landed soon (and there are free silos) === gatox_lunch is now known as gatox [16:32] oh. I guess there's already a silo for scopes-shell :( [16:33] popey: thanks === _salem is now known as salem_ [16:34] popey: is this the bug blocking the content-hub landing? [16:35] bfiller: i believe so, will chase up when the guys are online === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [17:18] psivaa: fginther`: and this type of stuff does not help either http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/generic-deb-autopilot-utopic-touch/3755/console [17:22] psivaa: fginther`: guys we really need to do something. It is just not OK to waith 7 hours to see an internal error for a single MR to build... [17:45] trainguards: can I get a reconfigure for silo16 plz? Want to add another qtmir change (adds lttng timing stats) [17:46] greyback_, as long as you're not adding a new source package you can click 'Recon' yourself in the dashboard. [17:47] robru: ah cool, thanks. I thought it was once per MR. === sil2100 changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Ubuntu CI Engineering Team | CI Train support: trainguards | Vanguard (general help): Ursinha | CI Train Status: #179 promoted | CI Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | Known issues: we're in TRAINCON-0 currently! Also: citrain struggles with source packages, don't WATCH_ONLY until *after* the source is built in PPA. http://youtu.be/-Rnw0D2AdYU. [17:49] robru: btw.! Could you add to your dashboard the Landing instructions/image status field? :) [17:49] robru: currently it only seems visible in the spreadsheet, would be nice to have it in the Dashboard as well [17:49] (maybe in the page title even?) [17:50] sil2100, sure [17:50] Thanks [17:51] greyback_, you do need to reconfigure if you add a new MR, but you only need our help if you're adding a new source package. [17:51] robru: ah I see. Thanks === om26er|away is now known as om26er [18:36] sil2100, util-linux migrated ... should we be brave and try a built ? [18:36] *build [18:39] Brave is our second name [18:39]