/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2014/08/19/#ubuntu-motu.txt

ESphynxhey guys, so I was considering uploading a debdiff of ecere-sdk directly to ubuntu and was wondering whether I needed to modify the changelog02:36
ESphynxbut apparently the changelog in http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/utopic/ecere-sdk  all mentions 'unstable' and has Debian style versions...02:36
ESphynxuploaded debdiff: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecere-sdk/+bug/135857203:14
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1358572 in ecere-sdk (Ubuntu) "Update to Ecere SDK 0.44.10 (Major milestone, many usability fixes)" [Undecided,New]03:14
sneyNoskcaj: the "missing" hardening flag is one that was newly added to dpkg-buildflags *after* 2.10.0 was uploaded, by the way.03:28
sneyso everything is fine.03:28
=== SuperLag_ is now known as SuperLag
dholbachgood morning06:04
geserESphynx: if the changelog mentions unstable and has Debian versions then it was synced from Debian; if you want an upload directly to Ubuntu then you need a Ubuntu codename (utopic) in the changelog and a Ubuntu style version06:36
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
ESphynxgeser: I was going to do that, but then I noticed the current changelog @ http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/utopic/ecere-sdk all says 'unstable'12:07
ESphynxdholbach: thanks for trying out the build... kind of puzzled with this EcereAudio thing :S will look at that today12:08
dholbachok12:09
ESphynxso to reupload again should I just modify the new entry in the changelog to say ubuntu-1 ?12:09
geserESphynx: because that's a sync from Debian, not direct upload to Ubuntu12:19
=== Pici` is now known as Pici
=== shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer
ESphynxgeser: right, I just didn't know what to do now since it's usually synced form debian, but I'd like it to make the FF...13:18
geserESphynx: if you want to upload to Ubuntu, change the distribution in the changelog to "utopic" and use the Ubuntu versioning scheme (0.44.10-0ubuntu1)13:20
ESphynxgeser: right, but only on the last entry of the changelog?13:21
geseryes13:21
ESphynx(new entry)13:21
ESphynxOK that's what I was confused about. thanks, will do that for reupload, apparently it's not building :|13:21
geserthe older versions in the changelog were uploaded to Debian unstable, so this is still correct13:22
ESphynxI see13:23
ESphynxthe thing is I wasn't sure if a potential sponsor would upload to Debian and sync as xnox usually does or upload to Ubuntu only..13:23
geserif you want to merge this Ubuntu changelog entry in your Debian changelog is up to you, some DD do it, but it's not necessary13:23
geserthis probably depends if your Ubuntu sponsor is also a DD13:24
Xan_do_canhello everybody16:31
Xan_do_canhola saO16:46
ESphynxhmm, I'm getting a different error here :S no dependency information found for /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 -- what could that mean?17:12
jtaylorwhat version number would a SRU have that updates the version number with the same version available in +1? x-0ubuntu0.1?17:56
jtayloror x-1ubuntu0.117:56
jtaylorwith x-1ubuntu1 in +117:57
=== Guest64178 is now known as med_
=== med_ is now known as medberry
ESphynxhow to set up pbuilder to create something for utopic ?20:31
ESphynxWill sudo pbuilder create --debootstrapopts --variant=buildd automatically do that?20:31
ESphynxor --distribution utopic ?20:31
NoskcajESphynx, I like pbuilder-dist. Just run pbuilder-dist utopic amd64 create20:52
ESphynxthank you21:04
ESphynxIs pbuilder used more than sdist for ubuntu?21:05
ESphynxbtw the package built on my utopic upgrade system, so trying pbuilder now to see if I get those errors dholbach was getting :S21:05
=== _ruben_ is now known as _ruben
ESphynxOK that really built fine for me, in pbuilder as well...21:18
ESphynxcould anyone please retry it?22:02
ESphynxalso do I need to upload a new debdiff just for changing that verstion to -0ubuntu1 or?22:02

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!