[02:36] <ESphynx> hey guys, so I was considering uploading a debdiff of ecere-sdk directly to ubuntu and was wondering whether I needed to modify the changelog
[02:36] <ESphynx> but apparently the changelog in http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/utopic/ecere-sdk  all mentions 'unstable' and has Debian style versions...
[03:14] <ESphynx> uploaded debdiff: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecere-sdk/+bug/1358572
[03:14] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1358572 in ecere-sdk (Ubuntu) "Update to Ecere SDK 0.44.10 (Major milestone, many usability fixes)" [Undecided,New]
[03:28] <sney> Noskcaj: the "missing" hardening flag is one that was newly added to dpkg-buildflags *after* 2.10.0 was uploaded, by the way.
[03:28] <sney> so everything is fine.
=== SuperLag_ is now known as SuperLag
[06:04] <dholbach> good morning
[06:36] <geser> ESphynx: if the changelog mentions unstable and has Debian versions then it was synced from Debian; if you want an upload directly to Ubuntu then you need a Ubuntu codename (utopic) in the changelog and a Ubuntu style version
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[12:07] <ESphynx> geser: I was going to do that, but then I noticed the current changelog @ http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/utopic/ecere-sdk all says 'unstable'
[12:08] <ESphynx> dholbach: thanks for trying out the build... kind of puzzled with this EcereAudio thing :S will look at that today
[12:09] <dholbach> ok
[12:09] <ESphynx> so to reupload again should I just modify the new entry in the changelog to say ubuntu-1 ?
[12:19] <geser> ESphynx: because that's a sync from Debian, not direct upload to Ubuntu
=== Pici` is now known as Pici
=== shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer
[13:18] <ESphynx> geser: right, I just didn't know what to do now since it's usually synced form debian, but I'd like it to make the FF...
[13:20] <geser> ESphynx: if you want to upload to Ubuntu, change the distribution in the changelog to "utopic" and use the Ubuntu versioning scheme (0.44.10-0ubuntu1)
[13:21] <ESphynx> geser: right, but only on the last entry of the changelog?
[13:21] <geser> yes
[13:21] <ESphynx> (new entry)
[13:21] <ESphynx> OK that's what I was confused about. thanks, will do that for reupload, apparently it's not building :|
[13:22] <geser> the older versions in the changelog were uploaded to Debian unstable, so this is still correct
[13:23] <ESphynx> I see
[13:23] <ESphynx> the thing is I wasn't sure if a potential sponsor would upload to Debian and sync as xnox usually does or upload to Ubuntu only..
[13:23] <geser> if you want to merge this Ubuntu changelog entry in your Debian changelog is up to you, some DD do it, but it's not necessary
[13:24] <geser> this probably depends if your Ubuntu sponsor is also a DD
[16:31] <Xan_do_can> hello everybody
[16:46] <Xan_do_can> hola saO
[17:12] <ESphynx> hmm, I'm getting a different error here :S no dependency information found for /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 -- what could that mean?
[17:56] <jtaylor> what version number would a SRU have that updates the version number with the same version available in +1? x-0ubuntu0.1?
[17:56] <jtaylor> or x-1ubuntu0.1
[17:57] <jtaylor> with x-1ubuntu1 in +1
=== Guest64178 is now known as med_
=== med_ is now known as medberry
[20:31] <ESphynx> how to set up pbuilder to create something for utopic ?
[20:31] <ESphynx> Will sudo pbuilder create --debootstrapopts --variant=buildd automatically do that?
[20:31] <ESphynx> or --distribution utopic ?
[20:52] <Noskcaj> ESphynx, I like pbuilder-dist. Just run pbuilder-dist utopic amd64 create
[21:04] <ESphynx> thank you
[21:05] <ESphynx> Is pbuilder used more than sdist for ubuntu?
[21:05] <ESphynx> btw the package built on my utopic upgrade system, so trying pbuilder now to see if I get those errors dholbach was getting :S
=== _ruben_ is now known as _ruben
[21:18] <ESphynx> OK that really built fine for me, in pbuilder as well...
[22:02] <ESphynx> could anyone please retry it?
[22:02] <ESphynx> also do I need to upload a new debdiff just for changing that verstion to -0ubuntu1 or?