[06:50] <geser> ESphynx: I don't think that debdiff will be used as it's a new upstream version (-> new .orig.tar), I'd attach the .debian.tar.* and add a link where to get the .orig.tar (ideally the same which gets later uploaded to Debian as it would allow to sync again)
[06:51] <geser> perhaps also add a diff of the debian/ directory for review
=== ricotz_ is now known as ricotz
[07:36] <dholbach> good morning
[09:47] <iulian> Morning dholbach.
[09:47] <dholbach> hi iulian
[11:23] <ESphynx> 'morning
[11:24] <ESphynx> geser: I did put a link to the whole thing on mentors?
[11:26] <ESphynx> dholbach: any idea why the build was failing for you? :|
[11:31] <ESphynx> geser: and http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/e/ecere-sdk/ecere-sdk_0.44.09.9-1.debian.tar.gz --> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/ecere-sdk/ecere-sdk_0.44.10-1.debian.tar.xz
[11:34] <ESphynx> dholbach: Perhaps somehow applying the .debdiff you were missing the .install files?
[11:57] <dholbach> hi ESphynx
[11:57] <dholbach> ESphynx, I don't think so - I just applied the diff and it applied cleanly
[11:58] <dholbach> but I can try again
[11:59] <dholbach> cp: cannot stat 'debian/tmp/$LIBDIR/ec/libEcereAudio.so.0.44': No such file or directory
[11:59] <dholbach> ^ this doesn't look like a missing .install file
[11:59] <dholbach> more like an install file pointing to the wrong place
[12:06] <dholbach> ESphynx, strangely enough the build succeeded this time - I'll just modify the changelog entry to 1) have -0ubuntu1 as version number, 2) list LP: #1358572
[12:06] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1358572 in ecere-sdk (Ubuntu) "Update to Ecere SDK 0.44.10 (Major milestone, many usability fixes)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1358572
[12:06] <dholbach> "Closes: <Debian bugs>" will also not be necessary
[12:09] <dholbach> uploaded
[12:16] <ESphynx> dholbach: yeah it always worked for me
[12:16] <ESphynx> so strange
[12:17] <ESphynx> awesome dholbach! thank you!
[12:17] <ESphynx> but why on earth wasn't it working last time?
[12:17] <dholbach> no idea, sorry
[12:25] <ESphynx> Nice! ppc64el seems to build fine!
[12:25] <ESphynx> wonder if arm64 will build too?
[12:29] <ESphynx> (It seems like it will! this is exciting :) )
[18:19] <filipsohajek> Hi, i've got a question. If i'm packaging a ruby program, that needs all files in one directory, can i place that directory in /usr/local ?  Thanks
[18:19] <Zhenech> no
[18:20] <filipsohajek> So, where i can place that files? Or i'm supposed to change the source code to support FS hirearchy?
[18:21] <Zhenech> you do not package stuff into /usr/local
[18:21] <Zhenech> many packages have stuff in /usr/share/<package>
[18:21] <Zhenech> or does it need all files as in: all the code and all the rest in one dir?
[18:21] <filipsohajek> Oh, sorry. It was /usr/share .
[18:22] <filipsohajek> Oh, sorry. It was /usr/local/share .
[18:22] <Zhenech> make it /usr/share.
[18:22] <filipsohajek> Sorry, i'm confused. Definitely : /usr/share
[18:23] <filipsohajek> Thanks, another question. Can i get sponsorship here?