=== gusnan_ is now known as gusnan
[08:13] <kdeuser56> shadeslayer
[11:10] <jtaylor> doko__: has -fno-strict-aliasing disappeared from python2 build flags?
[11:10] <jtaylor> thats not good, python2 is not strict-aliasing asafe
[11:10] <jtaylor> python3 is
[11:11] <jtaylor> python2 builds now have hundreds of aliasing warnings :(
=== wendar_ is now known as wendar
[16:54] <marvin-hh> Is there anyone in here who thinks closing this bug was sane?  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-setup/+bug/38712
[16:54] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 38712 in apt-setup (Ubuntu) "No feedback when "extracting templates from packages" on a slow machine" [Wishlist,Invalid]
[16:56] <marvin-hh> I have seen such behaviour -- closing perfectly understandable bug reports -- a million times already. I would like to know a good reason for that practice. Just because you close a ticket, doesn't mean that the underlying problem goes away.
[18:08] <Novice201y> Hello. How can I check my changes in  source? Do I need to install second Ubuntu on testing machine?
=== ximion is now known as ximion-afk
=== Unit193 is now known as TheMaster
=== ari-tczew changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Feature Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> trusty | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots:".
[22:44] <Noskcaj> Could someone please retry pry? It's tests work fine locally
[22:45] <Noskcaj> Also, diod
[23:07] <cjwatson> Noskcaj: I'm just doing a mass give-back of failures in utopic now that it's the weekend and builders are relatively quiet.
[23:07] <cjwatson> So that'll cover that.
[23:07] <Noskcaj> thanks
[23:08] <Noskcaj> cjwatson, Is it possible to for an arch:all package to build on amd64 in ubuntu, or do i have to make it arch:amd64?
[23:09] <Noskcaj> Package is "infernal", it's amd64 and kfreebsd-amd64 in debian, but ftbfs here because of our arch:all buildd
[23:10] <cjwatson> Happy day-long build queue.
[23:10] <cjwatson> Noskcaj: The architecture-independent builder isn't customisable per-package, no.
[23:11] <cjwatson> Though we have talked about switching it to amd64 for everything.  We'd probably have to do that at a series boundary though.
[23:11] <Noskcaj> ok. I'll made a patch to make the arch:all part arch:amd64 later today
[23:11] <cjwatson> That sounds bad.
[23:11] <cjwatson> That'll mean it isn't even *available* elsewhere.
[23:12] <cjwatson> Might be better to revert the patch that stopped it working on i386, even though the point about SSE2 is in general somewhat reasonable.
[23:13] <Noskcaj> cjwatson, ok. Hopefully no one in ubuntu is using it on non-SSE2
[23:14] <cjwatson> Well, worst case is it carries on breaking for them, right?
[23:14] <cjwatson> Make sure to make a note in the changelog that this should be reverted when we change the Architecture: all build architecture to amd64 in Ubuntu.
[23:15] <jtaylor> which package?
[23:15] <cjwatson> 00:09 <Noskcaj> Package is "infernal", it's amd64 and kfreebsd-amd64 in debian, but ftbfs here because of our arch:all buildd
[23:18] <jtaylor> how does that get built on an arch:all buildd? the -doc package?
[23:19] <Noskcaj> yeah