LiamW | Asking again, sorry: Is there a "better" way to check if a bazaar branch is bound other than grepping for "checkout" in bzr info? | 04:21 |
---|---|---|
wgrant | LiamW: It depends what you're trying to do. If it's for a script, consider using bzrlib directly. You could also just check for the presence of .bzr/branch/location. | 05:08 |
LiamW | wgrant: I need a choice of 'bzr pull' or 'bzr up' depending on whether the branch is bound | 05:09 |
LiamW | That is all | 05:09 |
wgrant | But in what context? | 05:09 |
LiamW | An OS X packaging script | 05:09 |
LiamW | bash | 05:10 |
=== ndec|vacations is now known as ndec_ | ||
=== ndec_ is now known as ndec | ||
dehein | Hi i try to build a package based on this guide. http://elementaryos.org/docs/code/packaging But i get build errors. Can somebody check my buildlog and or my code: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/183134639/buildlog.txt.gz https://code.launchpad.net/~dehein/+junk/hello-packaging | 13:32 |
geser | dehein: you have a syntax error in your debian/control: there is an extra newline in line 4 (the > from line 5 belongs to line 4) | 13:37 |
dehein | it still seems to have a problem: new changelog: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/183135102/buildlog.txt.gz | 13:42 |
wgrant | dehein: You're missing a newline after line 8 | 13:45 |
wgrant | And your changelog is badly formatted. | 13:45 |
wgrant | You may wish to read the relevant sections of the Debian Policy Manual. | 13:45 |
dehein | thx | 13:48 |
=== zoktar_ is now known as zoktar | ||
=== cprov__ is now known as cprov | ||
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
pnorman | I'm trying to fix building a package for Ubuntu 12.04 for a PPA, and one of the steps the maintainer has outline is copying a clang-3.4 package into the Ubuntu PPA. Is it possible to pull in packages from http://llvm.org/apt/, or does it need to be a PPA on launchpad? | 16:46 |
pnorman | (references https://github.com/mapnik/debian/issues/2) | 16:46 |
rocketnine | hey guys, quick question. i'm creating my first ppa, i might have a few unrelated packages hosted on launchpad in the near future, should i create individual ppa's or is a single ppa for these packages alright? | 16:47 |
dobey | pnorman: launchpad can only copy from an archive it knows about to another archive it knows about (so, official distro archives, and PPAs only, not arbitrary archives on the internet) | 16:47 |
dobey | rocketnine: it depends on how you want to support them and the users you expect to use them, but one PPA is usually fine | 16:48 |
pnorman | Any suggestions for clang-3.4 to copy from? The maintainer found https://launchpad.net/~h-rayflood/+archive/ubuntu/llvm/+packages as a canidate | 16:49 |
dobey | pnorman: 14.04 has clang-3.4, so if it's in precise-backports you could use that one, or you can do a backport yourself | 16:49 |
rocketnine | sweet, thanks | 16:49 |
dobey | i don't know the owner of that ppa, so can't say how trustworthy the packaging might be off hand. and i certainly don't have time to check and see. backporting from official ubuntu packages when available is generally the best thing to do though | 16:50 |
pnorman | dobey: not in precise-backports, but is in precise-updates | 16:51 |
pnorman | thanks | 16:51 |
dobey | oh, if it's in -updates, then you should be fine without copying even, i think | 16:52 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
pnorman | Trying to get software running that depends on the latest versions is always fun | 16:56 |
=== ubot5` is now known as ubot5 | ||
dobey | well, that's why lts->lts upgrades are supported | 17:15 |
pnorman | I'm trying to get travis-ci going, which still runs on 12.04, so I'm kind of stuck with that version | 17:21 |
dobey | travis-ci lets you add arbitrary archives to pull deps from? | 17:35 |
pnorman | yes. the issue is that my software depends on a recent version of mapnik, and that PPA hasn't been building on 12.04 since it needs g++-4.8 or clang++-3.4, as well as being quite resource intensive. I could compile mapnik myself, but it's the type of compile you start then go for coffee on | 17:44 |
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
pkern | Hey. Will I lose anything if I deactivate an OpenPGP key and hence lose the Code of Conduct sig? I can't sign the CoC before deactivating the old key. | 18:25 |
pkern | I.e. if that drops me from groups or anything if the CoC goes missing. | 18:25 |
dobey | no | 18:32 |
pkern | Plus the other key is actually "sign only" which is now untrue and LP does not seem to reimport the key with the actual encryption subkey. | 18:50 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== nickoe_ is now known as nickoe | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!