[04:21] <LiamW> Asking again, sorry: Is there a "better" way to check if a bazaar branch is bound other than grepping for "checkout" in bzr info?
[05:08] <wgrant> LiamW: It depends what you're trying to do. If it's for a script, consider using bzrlib directly. You could also just check for the presence of .bzr/branch/location.
[05:09] <LiamW> wgrant: I need a choice of 'bzr pull' or 'bzr up' depending on whether the branch is bound
[05:09] <LiamW> That is all
[05:09] <wgrant> But in what context?
[05:09] <LiamW> An OS X packaging script
[05:10] <LiamW> bash
=== ndec|vacations is now known as ndec_
=== ndec_ is now known as ndec
[13:32] <dehein> Hi i try to build a package based on this guide. http://elementaryos.org/docs/code/packaging But i get build errors. Can somebody check my buildlog and or my code: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/183134639/buildlog.txt.gz  https://code.launchpad.net/~dehein/+junk/hello-packaging
[13:37] <geser> dehein: you have a syntax error in your debian/control: there is an extra newline in line 4 (the > from line 5 belongs to line 4)
[13:42] <dehein> it still seems to have a problem: new changelog: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/183135102/buildlog.txt.gz
[13:45] <wgrant> dehein: You're missing a newline after line 8
[13:45] <wgrant> And your changelog is badly formatted.
[13:45] <wgrant> You may wish to read the relevant sections of the Debian Policy Manual.
[13:48] <dehein> thx
=== zoktar_ is now known as zoktar
=== cprov__ is now known as cprov
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
[16:46] <pnorman> I'm trying to fix building a package for Ubuntu 12.04 for a PPA, and one of the steps the maintainer has outline is copying a clang-3.4 package into the Ubuntu PPA. Is it possible to pull in packages from http://llvm.org/apt/, or does it need to be a PPA on launchpad?
[16:46] <pnorman> (references https://github.com/mapnik/debian/issues/2)
[16:47] <rocketnine> hey guys, quick question.  i'm creating my first ppa, i might have a few unrelated packages hosted on launchpad in the near future, should i create individual ppa's or is a single ppa for these packages alright?
[16:47] <dobey> pnorman: launchpad can only copy from an archive it knows about to another archive it knows about (so, official distro archives, and PPAs only, not arbitrary archives on the internet)
[16:48] <dobey> rocketnine: it depends on how you want to support them and the users you expect to use them, but one PPA is usually fine
[16:49] <pnorman> Any suggestions for clang-3.4 to copy from? The maintainer found https://launchpad.net/~h-rayflood/+archive/ubuntu/llvm/+packages as a canidate
[16:49] <dobey> pnorman: 14.04 has clang-3.4, so if it's in precise-backports you could use that one, or you can do a backport yourself
[16:49] <rocketnine> sweet, thanks
[16:50] <dobey> i don't know the owner of that ppa, so can't say how trustworthy the packaging might be off hand. and i certainly don't have time to check and see. backporting from official ubuntu packages when available is generally the best thing to do though
[16:51] <pnorman> dobey: not in precise-backports, but is in precise-updates
[16:51] <pnorman> thanks
[16:52] <dobey> oh, if it's in -updates, then you should be fine without copying even, i think
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
[16:56] <pnorman> Trying to get software running that depends on the latest versions is always fun
=== ubot5` is now known as ubot5
[17:15] <dobey> well, that's why lts->lts upgrades are supported
[17:21] <pnorman> I'm trying to get travis-ci going, which still runs on 12.04, so I'm kind of stuck with that version
[17:35] <dobey> travis-ci lets you add arbitrary archives to pull deps from?
[17:44] <pnorman> yes. the issue is that my software depends on a recent version of mapnik, and that PPA hasn't been building on 12.04 since it needs g++-4.8 or clang++-3.4, as well as being quite resource intensive. I could compile mapnik myself, but it's the type of compile you start then go for coffee on
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
[18:25] <pkern> Hey. Will I lose anything if I deactivate an OpenPGP key and hence lose the Code of Conduct sig? I can't sign the CoC before deactivating the old key.
[18:25] <pkern> I.e. if that drops me from groups or anything if the CoC goes missing.
[18:32] <dobey> no
[18:50] <pkern> Plus the other key is actually "sign only" which is now untrue and LP does not seem to reimport the key with the actual encryption subkey.
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== nickoe_ is now known as nickoe
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha