[03:05]  * cjwatson unblocks the perl transition, hopefully
[03:05] <cjwatson> giant unblock line :)
[03:34] <cjwatson> proposed-migration is taking a while ...
[06:45] <elfy> morning - I see that the xubuntu issue should be sorted now, can we get a rebuild of our image for testing please - tia
[07:14] <bzoltan> hello, I am about to release a new UI Toolkit package and I see here http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html that the landing is blocked with "Not touching package due to block request by freeze" excuse.
[07:22] <asac> anyone can help bzoltan ?
[07:29] <cjwatson> bzoltan,asac: unblocked
[07:29] <bzoltan> cjwatson: Thank you
[07:30] <asac> cjwatson: nice one! you should really be in bed though :(
[07:30] <asac> (i guess)
[07:30] <asac> thanks a bunch!
[07:31] <cjwatson> eh, whatever, I wouldn't usually be in bed at only 12:30 at home and my sleep patterns are all funny here
[07:48] <ochosi> stgraber: hey there! elfy previously mentioned it in this chan, but the problem with the xubuntu iso should be fixed now, so if you could do a rebuild of the image that'd be great! thanks!
[08:06] <Saviq> is the status in http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#url-dispatcher correct? /topic says archive is open?
[08:08] <cjwatson> topic is wrong
[08:10] <cjwatson> Saviq: I've unblocked url-dispatcher
[08:12] <Saviq> cjwatson, thanks
[11:26] <elfy> hi - is there anyone about who can get a xubuntu utopic beta built please
[11:29] <elfy> didn't see that ochosi had asked earlier - sorry :)
[12:08] <Mirv> could someone please unblock webbrowser-app from the freeze?
[12:08] <Mirv> bzoltan: ^
[12:09] <Mirv> it includes a fix that would be needed together with the ubuntu-ui-toolkit that was already unblocked earlier
[12:23] <zul> can someone de-binary new python-oslo.utils please?
[13:36] <cjwatson> Mirv,bzoltan: done
[13:36] <bzoltan> cjwatson: thanks
[13:55] <Mirv> thanks
[14:18] <stgraber> ochosi: rebuilds are usually self service nowadays from the ISO tracker UI. Anyway, kicked one for you now.
[14:18] <ochosi> stgraber: self service? is that hard to do/learn or does one need special rights for that?
[14:18] <ochosi> thanks anyway though!
[14:19] <ogra_> stgraber, oh, since you say iso tracker ... rtm is there bug missing any entries to select actual builds
[14:19] <ogra_> smells like we miss some backend stuff there
[14:20] <stgraber> zul: there you go
[14:20] <zul> stgraber:  thank you
[14:20] <stgraber> ochosi: not very hard, head to iso.qa.ubuntu.com, login, make sure to tick any team boxes listed on the SSO page, then on the milestone page, select the products you want to rebuild and click the rebuild button at the end of the page
[14:21] <ochosi> stgraber: oh great, i'll look into that!
[14:21] <stgraber> ogra_: ok, so the problem seems to be that nusakan never managed to push a build to the tracker for rtm...
[14:21] <ogra_> ah
[14:21] <stgraber> KeyError: "Milestone 'Unknown series' not found"
[14:21] <elfy> stgraber: oh ... I didn't realise we could trigger a rebuild when there's not one available on the tracker otherwise I would have done so - sorry
[14:22] <ogra_> heh, yeah ... its not even ubuntu :)
[14:22] <stgraber> ogra_: how urgent is it? I'
[14:22] <stgraber> *I'm sort of busy with other things and I suspect cjwatson is busy being at Debconf at the moment
[14:22] <ogra_> not super urgent ... the stuff from the mail thread is more urgent
[14:22] <ogra_> (getting system-image set up asap )
[14:23] <ogra_> i can build manually on nusakan for the time being
[14:23] <ogra_> or rsalveti for the US shift
[14:37] <shadeslayer> sigh
[14:38] <shadeslayer> https://code.launchpad.net/~rohangarg/ubiquity/plasma5/+merge/228528 < languishing in review for a month
[14:38] <shadeslayer> not cool
[15:07] <Riddell> shadeslayer: onto it
[15:07] <shadeslayer> cheers
[15:08] <shadeslayer> Riddell: mind uploading/respinning ISO's?
[15:25] <shadeslayer> Riddell++
[15:25] <Riddell> yay, colin fixed perlkde!
[15:25] <Riddell> genius
[15:25] <Riddell> well obviously he broke it in the first place by uploading the new perl, but still genius
[15:25] <Riddell> umm, what are those 25 entries?
[15:25] <shadeslayer> 0.o
[15:36] <stgraber> Riddell: cloud images + xubuntu
[15:36] <shadeslayer> you know the world is weird when PPC finishes before x86*
[15:37] <stgraber> new Power machines are quite a bit faster than x86 these days
[15:37] <Riddell> stgraber: will you add upgrade tests?
[15:37] <stgraber> the problem is that most people got used to the very old ppc kit we had which was indeed kinda slow
[15:37] <stgraber> Riddell: I can do that yeah
[15:38] <Riddell> stgraber: would you know what to report problems in the initial boot menu on the live image as? there's no option for OEM and a random Back.. menu entry
[15:39] <stgraber> Riddell: that'd probably be gfxboot, unless you're testing on efi
[15:56] <Riddell> bug 1362225 and bug 1362226 reported
[15:56] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1362225 in gfxboot "menu option for "Back..."" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1362225
[15:56] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1362226 in gfxboot "No OEM option in pre-boot menu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1362226
[15:57] <Riddell> gosh, double the bug bots
[15:57] <shadeslayer> Riddell: they had bug reports already
[15:57] <Riddell> shadeslayer: oh?
[15:57] <shadeslayer> yes
[15:57] <Riddell> where?
[15:58] <shadeslayer> on launchpad somewhere
[15:58] <shadeslayer> see previous image testing
[16:01] <Riddell> bug 1334189
[16:01] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1334189 in gfxboot-theme-ubuntu "syslinux offers no OEM mode on Kubuntu Utopic Alpha 1" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1334189
[16:03] <Riddell> how do syslinux and gfxboot relate?
[16:06] <shadeslayer> Riddell: it's the same thing, I called it syslinux, though I think the correct name is gfxboot
[16:23] <Riddell> stgraber: we need a respin of kubuntu-plasma5 once ubiquity is in but I'm about to leave, shadeslayer has bravely volunteered to be the co-contact for the kubuntu-plasma5 images, could you also set him up with access to iso.qa to respin the images?
[16:24] <stgraber> Riddell: access is done through team membership, so you'd need to setup a new LP team for that, make shadeslayer a member of it and then I can add that to the tracker
[16:24] <Riddell> stgraber: what team is used currently?
[16:25] <stgraber> Riddell: none because both you and ScottK are members of ~ubuntu-release which has right on every product already
[16:25] <Riddell> oh I see
[16:25] <Riddell> stgraber: can you use ~kubuntu-council then?
[16:25] <stgraber> sure
[16:26] <Riddell> never like to set up yet another team if it can be avoided
[16:26] <Riddell> or ~kubuntu-dev maybe?
[16:26] <shadeslayer> too broad?
[16:27] <Riddell> shrug, all trusted people
[16:28] <stgraber> kubuntu-dev means all coredevs too, so probably not that great an idea
[16:28] <Riddell> yeah, those coredev are a pretty dodgy lot :)
[16:28] <stgraber> :)
[16:33] <stgraber> shadeslayer: you should be all set
[16:34] <stgraber> took a while because you guys had a ton of products I had to update :)
[16:34] <shadeslayer> question, is there a special page I have to go to?
[16:34] <shadeslayer> nope
[16:36] <shadeslayer> stgraber: how do I respin ISO's?
[16:39] <ogra_> shadeslayer, http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/
[16:39] <ogra_> log in
[16:39] <stgraber> shadeslayer: so when you login to the tracker it should show you a tick box for kubuntu-council
[16:39] <ogra_> click on "utopic daily"
[16:39] <stgraber> shadeslayer: once logged in, head to the beta-1 page, you should see tick boxes
[16:40] <ogra_> check the products yu want to see on the left
[16:40] <stgraber> shadeslayer: tick the ones you want to respin and head to the bottom of the page and select rebuild
[16:40] <ogra_> set a checkmark on the right for the ones you want to re-spin
[16:40] <shadeslayer> ahhh
[16:40] <shadeslayer> ok
[16:40] <ogra_> and select rebuild
[16:40] <shadeslayer> stgraber: ogra_ thanks
[16:40] <ogra_> :)
[16:40] <shadeslayer> I went to the admin page
[16:40]  * ogra_ is in parrot mode today :)
[16:40] <shadeslayer> and was trying to look there
[16:40]  * shadeslayer gives ogra_ some chillies
[16:40] <ogra_> yummy !
[16:43] <shadeslayer> huh
[16:43] <shadeslayer> all the builders seem to be in Cleaning mode
[16:43] <shadeslayer> what's that?
[16:45] <apw> i assume you mean the PPA builders ...
[16:46] <ogra_> probably the mode where they all switch to UPS power ... so the cleaning woman has a free socket for vaccum cleaning
[16:48] <shadeslayer> heh
[16:48] <shadeslayer> apw: yes
[16:58] <apw> shadeslayer, someone is poking it for us
[16:58] <shadeslayer> :)
[17:47] <shadeslayer> plasma 5 ISOs rebuilding
[18:14] <zul> can an archive admin please review python-osprober, python-lxc, and openstack-granite please?
[18:36] <apw> shadeslayer, and it looks un-bungged now
[19:28] <smoser> hey..
[19:28] <smoser> i uploaded percona-* before feature freeze (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/utopic/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=)
[19:28] <smoser> since they're not cleared from New, do i needto open a FFE to get them in ?
[19:30] <stgraber> no, we usually look at the upload date
[20:14] <gaughen> jdstrand, arges  oh great archive admins, would one of you please have a look at openstack-granite, python-lxc, python-osprofiler pretty please!!!!
[20:15] <arges> gaughen: sure
[20:17] <shadeslayer> So how come the plasma 5 iso is still rebuilding ?
[20:17] <arges> gaughen: i dont see those packages in the upload queue, nor as pending srus. What are you looking for exactly?
[20:21] <wxl> i finally found someone to do amd64+mac testing but he won't be able to finish until 28 Aug 1200 UTC. is that beyond the cutoff for testing?
[20:22] <stgraber> shadeslayer: it failed to build
[20:22] <wxl> ↑ stgraber
[20:23] <stgraber> wxl: 1200 UTC tomorrow should be fine I think, I plan on releasing in the afternoon here
[20:23] <stgraber> (here being US/Canada east coast)
[20:23] <shadeslayer> stgraber: oh? :S
[20:23] <stgraber> shadeslayer: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/kubuntu-plasma5/utopic/daily-live-20140827.log
[20:24] <stgraber> no log though, that's not super useful... let me re-trigger see if that fixes it
[20:26] <shadeslayer> Yeah :/
[20:26] <shadeslayer> stgraber: thx
[20:28] <wxl> stgraber: sounds good. i'm us/ca west
[20:28] <wxl> stgraber: if you're wondering what's going on, just ping me
[20:28] <shadeslayer> stgraber: would be nice if the state actually reflected that it failed
[20:29] <shadeslayer> I only checked iso.qa.ubuntu.com every 30 minutes or so
[20:29] <gaughen> slangasek, cjwatson, infinity --^
[20:29] <gaughen> oh shoot, I didn't see your reply arges, silly irc not scrolling
[20:29] <gaughen> zul, can you answer arges questions.
[20:30] <stgraber> arges: they are in utopic new
[20:30] <stgraber> arges: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/utopic/+queue
[20:31] <arges> stgraber: ahh i automatically assumed it was a trusty thing
[20:31] <arges> gaughen: are there bug numbers associated with these new packages?
[20:32] <shadeslayer> stgraber: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/utopic/kubuntu-plasma5/+build/5057 i386 failed again
[20:33] <shadeslayer> muchos fun
[20:34] <shadeslayer> stgraber: shall I hit rebuild again on i386?
[20:35] <stgraber> shadeslayer: let's see what happens to amd64 first
[20:35] <stgraber> the lack of build log is really rathe annoying though
[20:35] <shadeslayer> ack
[20:47] <shadeslayer> stgraber: I think amd64 succeeded
[20:48] <stgraber> yeah, looks like it did
[20:48]  * shadeslayer hits rebuild on i386 then
[20:48] <stgraber> I'll trigger yet another build once that one finishes (it'll fail unless both build)
[20:48] <shadeslayer> oh
[20:48] <stgraber> don't do that, it won't notice it
[20:48] <shadeslayer> I see
[20:49] <shadeslayer> did not know
[20:49] <shadeslayer> holding off then
[21:01] <dbarth> hi
[21:01] <dbarth> i'm trying to get the new oxide (1.2) be acked for landing in utopic
[21:02] <dbarth> oxide 1.2 is a pre-requ. for a new webapp autologin feature, part of an upcoming silo landing (7)
[21:02] <dbarth> please advise what I need to provide to unfreeze oxide
[21:02] <dbarth> it may just be the normal multi-arch issue, where oxide is not avaiable but on x86 and armhf
[21:03] <dbarth> for ref: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxide-qt
[21:07] <shadeslayer> dbarth: maybe its because of the utopic archive freeze?
[21:11] <dbarth> shadeslayer: happening right now?
[21:11] <dbarth> well, if so, i missed that part of the schedule
[21:11] <stgraber> dbarth: beta 1 is this week, archive is partly frozen until at some point tomorrow
[21:11] <dbarth> hmm, the channel topic update is recent indeed
[21:12] <dbarth> ok, i'll try my luck tomorrow then ;)
[21:12] <shadeslayer> ^^
[21:12] <shadeslayer> dbarth: don't ubuntu-phone things get a freeze exception?
[21:12] <shadeslayer> I vaguely recall seeing something related to ubuntu-phone things getting a exception
[21:12] <dbarth> i'd love if i can get such an exception
[21:13] <dbarth> the utopic landing for this silo is really tomorow morning, so i guess i can ask to the EU/UK folks tomorrow
[21:24] <shadeslayer> hurray
[21:24]  * shadeslayer tests
[21:41] <shadeslayer> stgraber: heh yeah, I broke it :p
[21:41] <shadeslayer> tomorrow is going to be fun
[21:54] <asac`> stgraber: i believe slangasek said at some point that such "beta" freezes shouldn't really exist or at least shouldn't be any practical hinderance anymore? just remember that any landing coming from touch is super critical at this point in time.
[21:54] <asac`> this was about oxide-qt request
[21:54] <asac`> err whatever dbarth wanted
[21:55] <gaughen> arges, Chuck submitted these before feature freeze so we thought a bug wasn't needed
[21:55] <gaughen> and apologies for the delay, I had to bug zul
[22:01] <asac`> would be cool if someeone could check out dbarth's unfreeze request above from release team for his touch landing
[22:01] <asac`> thanks
[22:07] <stgraber> asac: we don't do hard freezes, so people are still free to upload as they wish, so on that side it's much more relaxed that in the past. The only thing we do is hold the packages in -proposed until after the freeze is lifted.