[06:40] <urulama> jujugui: when using juju, please use logging: juju bootstrap --logging-config="<root>=DEBUG;juju=TRACE"
[08:01] <frankban> urulama: morning
[12:18]  * frankban lunches
[13:30] <hatch> morning
[13:33] <hatch> luca are these same bugs on chrome osx?
[13:33] <luca> hatch: yea, though it seems to be popping up in parts that were unaffected
[13:33] <luca> hatch: or I didn’t notice them
[13:34] <hatch> the issue doesn't happen in any other browser though, correct?
[13:40] <hatch> jujugui is anyone running chrome canary? Are you having svg rendering issues like reported here https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-gui/+bug/1358671
[13:40] <mup> Bug #1358671: Charm icons not rendering properly <juju-gui:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1358671>
[13:42] <urulama> Chrome Version 37.0.2062.94 ... works fine
[13:42] <urulama> hatch: is thath jujucharms.com?
[13:43] <frankban> hatch: I've seen that issue with my chrome on linux: 36.0.1985.125
[13:50] <hatch> yeah I'm just wondering if it's fixed in canary
[13:51] <hatch> canary isn't available for linux unfortunately
[13:51] <hatch> guess I can grab it for osx
[13:53] <hatch__> Makyo: you in yet?
[13:56] <hatch__> luca:  are you running chrome canary? Can I get you to run chrome canary? :)
[14:07] <luca> hatch: I have chrome canary
[14:07] <luca> hatch: and yes, as far as I can tell it doesn’t happen in any other browser
[14:07] <hatch> luca:  can you plz make sure it's updated and use it for a while to see if the issue persists? There is another issue with the charms with the default icon (it's just grey) but it doesn't appear to have the rendering issues of the others
[14:08] <hatch> luca:  I need to file a bug with chrome and go through the process of setting up a repro and all that - so if it's fixed on canary then we can just wait :/
[14:09] <luca> hatch: I can confirm the bug does not appear in chrome canary
[14:09] <luca> hatch: though the deafult icon is missing
[14:11] <hatch> it's just dark grey right?
[14:15] <luca> hatch: yep
[14:15] <hatch> luca:  ok phew - that's an issue I can handle
[14:15] <luca> hatch: lol
[14:15] <hatch> :) can you plz use canary for a while with it? 
[14:15] <hatch> just to be sure
[14:15] <luca> hatch: sure
[14:16] <hatch> I'm in Ubuntu land so it's hard for me to actually use it frequently
[14:16] <hatch> thanks!!
[14:16] <luca> hatch: lol
[14:16] <luca> hatch: since it works in canary, does that mean that when they send another update the svg charm icon bug will be fixed and that it’s not our problem/
[14:16] <luca> ?
[14:16] <hatch> yep
[14:16] <luca> hatch: I see, weird bug
[14:17] <hatch> yeah, chrome is falling appart 
[14:17] <hatch> it's 100% slower than safari for our tests atm
[14:17] <hatch> and absolutely destroys my battery life
[14:17] <luca> hatch: really? jeez
[14:19] <hatch> luca:  yeah...lets just hope they do another release before we push out mv :)
[14:19] <hatch> or we'll have to do all of our marketing shots in osx
[14:19] <hatch> lol
[14:19] <hatch> or *gasp* windows!
[14:20] <luca> hahaha never!
[14:23] <hatch> lol
[14:23] <hatch> luca:  see now that the issue is restricted to a single svg, and happens 100% of the time, it'll be so much easier to debug/create a repro for
[14:24] <luca> hatch: I bet hehe
[14:36] <urulama> jujugui: i forgot about that i have parents meeting today, i'll be out for a daily call today, but be back later ... 
[14:37] <hatch> good luck
[14:37] <hatch> other parents can be so catty 
[14:37] <hatch> :P
[14:37] <urulama> :D
[14:41] <hatch> I've been listening to http://www.di.fm/chillstep while working this week - pretty good work tunes
[14:45] <urulama> hatch: i put my Hue lights to "concentrate" mode :)
[14:45] <hatch> haha, and what mode is that? red?
[14:45] <hatch> dim red?
[14:45] <hatch> no blue
[14:45] <hatch> yeahhhhhh blue
[14:45] <urulama> hatch: bright white :)
[14:45] <hatch> lol
[14:52] <hatch> jujugui call in 8
[14:58] <hatch> jujugui call in 2
[14:58] <hatch> kanban it up!
[15:00] <Makyo> Hangouts freezing for me
[15:01] <hatch> bac: call
[15:15] <Makyo> hatch, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Treachery_of_Images
[15:15] <hatch> yep, I can honestly say I've never seen said pipe
[15:16] <bac> what about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Son_of_Man
[15:16] <hatch> ohh I think I've seen that one
[15:23] <jcsackett> Makyo: you said we were showing blue in the health bar for uncommitted units?
[15:23] <jcsackett> i'm qa-ing your branch and i'm seeing uncommitted units just not accounted for, it looks like.
[15:23] <jcsackett> Makyo: to be clear, i'm fine with the health bar not showing them at all; i just want to confirm what i should be seeing.
[15:29] <Makyo> jcsackett, they were two separate branches; I don't think the blue-uncommitted branch was merged into the inspector-statusbar branch.
[15:30] <jcsackett> Makyo: oh, right. i am conflating things.
[15:30] <jcsackett> Makyo: never mind then. :p
[15:31] <lazyPower> rick_h_: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charmworld/+bug/1360374
[15:31] <mup> Bug #1360374: bundle proof is unaware of MAAS tagging <charmworld:Confirmed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1360374>
[15:31] <lazyPower> this is a blocker for some of the newer bundles we are getting
[15:32] <hatch> lazyPower:  he is on vacation until Monday
[15:32] <hatch> best to send an email
[15:33] <hatch> ok all, I'm out for a bit, bbl
[15:53] <bac> lazyPower: i can look at that issue this afternoon
[15:54] <lazyPower> bac: thanks.
[17:02] <hatch> bac:  so....the guy fixed the issue with a power thingy-a-ma-bob reset :/
[17:06] <hatch> bac in case you want to try it on your computer I can give you the details
[17:09] <hatch> jcsackett:  r u able to do a review on #520 and #521?
[17:10] <jcsackett> hatch: i can in a few sure.
[17:10] <hatch> thanks 
[17:10] <hatch> muchly
[18:19] <hatch> one more token bug down, one more to go (on sandbox)
[18:19] <hatch> I hope these sandbox fixes also fix the issues in the real env's
[18:19] <hatch> heh
[18:30] <marcoceppi> hey, is the guiserver proxy aware?
[18:30] <marcoceppi> seeing an issue deploying a bundle behind an HTTP proxy
[18:31] <hatch> marcoceppi:  I'm not entirely sure what you mean
[18:31] <hatch> as long as the gui can wss to the guiserver and the guiserver can wss to juju
[18:31] <marcoceppi> deploying a bundle is failing
[18:31] <marcoceppi> because the guiserver can't seem to get to charmstore, but juju via CLI can deploy the charm fine
[18:32] <marcoceppi> also, this is all second hand info
[18:32] <hatch> ohh ok, hmm well any idea if the gui can deploy the charm not in a bundle?
[18:32] <marcoceppi> let me find out
[18:33] <hatch> thanks
[18:33] <hatch> tbh it's been a long time since I've done anything in the guiserver but as far as I understand there is only one place where it goes and reaches out to the charmstore
[18:47] <hatch> marcoceppi: Is it this one? bug #1362749
[18:47] <mup> Bug #1362749: bundle deployment failed on juju-gui with proxy <juju-gui:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1362749>
[18:50] <marcoceppi> hatch: looks like it, fwiw, deploying a single charm works
[18:51] <marcoceppi> oh, that's the person that told me about i
[18:54] <hatch> marcoceppi:  ahh ok yeah that's very odd, frankban is the guy to talk to about this one as he knows it best
[18:54] <hatch> I'll point it out to him
[18:54] <marcoceppi> hatch: thanks
[19:03] <hatch> I REALLY hate how launchpad doesn't feel it necessary to include a link to the bug on status update emails
[19:52] <kadams54> guihelp: need reviews/QA on: https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/523
[19:53] <kadams54> hatch: didn't have the internet connectivity I thought I'd have this morning, but am now connected again. That PR means I can officially relax and enjoy my swap days :-)
[20:18]  * Makyo -> appointment
[20:25] <hazmat> rogpeppe1, rick_h_ ping
[20:25] <hazmat> marcoceppi, hatch i've got a fix and mp ready to fwiw
[20:26] <hazmat> rogpeppe1, rick_h_ nm
[20:45] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: pong
[20:45] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: if you still care :-)
[20:57] <hazmat> rogpeppe1, i don't ;-)
[20:57] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: :)
[20:58] <hazmat> rogpeppe1, was curious about any deployed charm store changes.. 
[20:58] <hazmat> rogpeppe1, cause $ juju publish use to give events.. and feedback and part of the new spec was deprecating that (replacing it with...)
[20:58] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: nothing in the new charm store has been actually deployed yet
[20:58] <hazmat> rogpeppe1, great :-) 
[20:59] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: any thoughts you have around the issue would of course be appreciated...
[20:59] <hazmat> rogpeppe1, i'll be in london starting sunday incidentally for the week.. if by chance your around.
[20:59] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: i'll be on the isle of skye
[20:59] <hazmat> rogpeppe1, basically publish cli pulled the events to give charmers feedback on issues with their charm
[20:59] <hazmat> sounds exotic
[20:59] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: which is only about 14 hours drive away :-)
[21:00] <hazmat> rogpeppe1, a validate endpoint might also suffice if there are  no more events..
[21:00] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: no actually, 11h
[21:01] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: the eventual aim is to have people publish their own charms
[21:01] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: rather than have a central ingestion process
[21:02] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: but in the meantime (until identity is more sorted) we'll probably have a similar issue. 
[21:03] <hazmat> rogpeppe1, yes.. re publish own charms.. probably also want central ingest
[21:03] <hazmat> need both
[21:03] <hazmat> rogpeppe1, seems like a long way away.. as in what happened this cycle..
[21:03] <hazmat> rogpeppe1, brussels in october.. many fine beers ahead ;-)
[21:03] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: looking forward to that
[21:04] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: happy memories of previous brussels trip, some years ago now
[21:05] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: another thing we want to do is provide an external validation command that does the same validation that the charm store will do
[21:06] <rogpeppe1> hazmat: we *could* add events again, i guess, too.
[21:11] <hatch> hazmat: oh ok awesome
[21:12] <hatch> hazmat:  you're going to brussels as well? Awesome I'll have a beer drinking buddy :)
[21:28] <marcoceppi> thanks hazmat
[21:42] <hatch> hazmat:  thanks for making the fix for that bug
[22:59] <huwshimi> Morning
[23:06] <hatch> morning hazmat
[23:06] <hatch> er 
[23:06] <hatch> morning huwshimi
[23:07] <huwshimi> hatch: How's things?
[23:07] <hatch> ohh decent
[23:08] <hatch> I solved the token icon bugs
[23:08] <hatch> just working on the tests
[23:08] <hatch> your branch which renders the nested containers is going to cause me issues
[23:08] <hatch> buuuuut oh well :)
[23:09] <huwshimi> hatch: Oh, sorry about that :)
[23:09] <huwshimi> hatch: Actually that branch could do with another review if you have some time? https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/522
[23:10] <huwshimi> hatch: What was the issue with the icons?
[23:11] <huwshimi> I mean, what was the solution?
[23:11] <hatch> huwshimi:  here is a wip https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/524
[23:11] <hatch> basically there were many....
[23:11] <hatch> haha
[23:11] <hatch> this fix is also just a stop-gap 
[23:12] <hatch> there is still some rendering issues with things disappearing before re-appearing
[23:12] <hatch> buuuuuut those issues are too deep to fix
[23:13] <huwshimi> hatch: Oh , this is not for the issue where the svg is all messed up then?
[23:14] <hatch> oh, no that issue is a chrome bug
[23:14] <huwshimi> Ah I see
[23:14] <hatch> it's -mostly- fixed on canary
[23:39] <hazmat> hatch, g'morning ;-)
[23:39] <hatch> haha sorry