[03:48]  * arosales finally getting to some review time.
[03:54]  * marcoceppi_ as well arosales
[03:55]  * arosales waves to marcoceppi_
[14:43] <arosales> mbruzek: are you working on a community doc for reviews?
[14:44] <mbruzek> arosales, Yes I am in a hangout with JoshStrobl
[14:44] <arosales> perhaps with JoshStrobl ?
[14:44] <arosales> ah cool.
[14:44] <JoshStrobl> o/
[14:44] <arosales> mbruzek: JoshStrobl one idea I had was to make the charm authoring docs a little more robust on commong things ~charmers catch in a review
[14:44] <arosales> so I made https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/1El7011q-DlaouSlkMLCiMOtWOjWu0ZX9bMva6AuVfq8/edit#heading=h.fql3tpkqjkg
[14:45] <arosales> so in addition to what can be caught in a review one idea I wanted to pitch was being preemtive on designing out a charm from learning in charm reviews
[14:45] <arosales> JoshStrobl: o/ Hello
[14:46] <arosales> JoshStrobl: mbruzek: just some food for thought. To JoshStrobl point I have been thinking about how to make the review time shorter in addition to getting more eyes on reviews
[14:47] <mbruzek> arosales, This document looks different than what we were working on.
[14:47] <mbruzek> https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/1QpKWUE4bVtwBg3bSxy0mdz7q2wMbXDBqjIfKs_TR8pY/edit
[14:47] <arosales> you should be able to edit that doc
[14:47] <arosales> mbruzek: understood
[14:47] <JoshStrobl> arosales, if you want to join the hangout -> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/g7rb4acvbvhcmeb6jdix7djwiea
[14:47] <mbruzek> We were taking the approach of the community charmer, what specific steps do they need to take to review a charm.
[14:47] <JoshStrobl> no obligation ;)
[14:48] <arosales> mbruzek: ya let me refill on coffee and join for a a few
[17:23] <JoshStrobl> arosales, first draft up on the Charm Review Process doc: https://github.com/JoshStrobl/docs/blob/master/src/en/charm-review-process.md
[17:25] <arosales> JoshStrobl: good stuff. Thanks for working on it with mbruzek
[17:25] <arosales> JoshStrobl: I'll be taking a look this afternoon
[18:03] <lazypooper> lazyPower_:  greetings from the subway charm
[18:15] <mattrae_> hi, is there a way to re-run a relation-joined hook? i had to resolve some hooks so queued upgrade-charm could happen, but now i missed out on those relation-joined hooks
[18:16] <mattrae_> i though juju run was originally meant to re-run hooks, can it do that?
[18:45] <mbruzek> Hi mattrae_ You can run juju debug-hooks charm-name/0
[18:49] <mbruzek> mattrae_, you can run juju resolved --retry name/0
[18:49] <mbruzek> That will put you in a charm context where you can rerun the hook if you like.
[18:56] <marcoceppi_> mattrae_: not really, no, if you've already passed the hook context. I opened a bug about this
[21:20] <jose> hey aisrael, mind a quick PM? :)
[21:22] <aisrael> Sure thing
[22:48] <jose> anyone around? I'm having some troubles bootstrapping