[00:43] <pcvonz> Anybody know how to to get Amarok to play stuff over DLNA?
[04:19] <vic_> hi
[05:19] <skreech_> Hullo
[05:19] <skreech_> aanyone up to troubleshooting a USB microphone?
[08:05] <nagerst> How do i disable the virtual desktop switching when using hte mousewheel at the top of the screen?
[08:18] <nagerst> very quiet today
[08:19] <MoonUnit`> possibibly in system settings, workspace behaviour , screen edges
[08:20] <nagerst> i found it.
[08:20] <nagerst> It was hidden in the desktop settings (right click the desktop)
[08:34] <bonk3rzz> vnc server??? anyone help???/
[08:34] <bonk3rzz> kubunu 14.04
[08:55] <kruemeltee> hello everybody ... got a little problem with the installer of kubuntu 14 x64 ... seems as if the installer doesn't recognize my first harddisk (on console I'm able to see the disk, write partition tables, everything), but within the graphical installer the setup won't let me choose sda. Only within the dropdownmenu "install bootloader" I found sda ... any ideas?
[08:59] <lordievader> kruemeltee: Could you make a screenshot of the partitioner?
[08:59] <lordievader> !screenshot | kruemeltee
[09:02] <kruemeltee> yeah ... I'll try it ... please wait
[09:10] <kruemeltee> okay, screenshot wasn't that easy but I made one with my cam ... first picture shows the manual prepare of partitions (only sdb /500GB) and sdc (USB Stick) is available ... ath the bottom you'll see sda for the bootloader-installation ... second screen is automatic installer
[09:10] <kruemeltee> http://imgur.com/EhtEzwO,yHZpMwy
[09:17] <lordievader> kruemeltee: Okay, go to a tty and give me the output  of "sudo fdisk -l" please.
[09:23] <kruemeltee> it's not that easy ... I'm chatting here on another machine ... please wait, I'll install ssh so I'm able to copy output
[09:24] <SN3> :-(
[09:24] <SN3> there is no decent GUI mysql client for kde
[09:24] <kruemeltee> but within console I'm able to see sda, I first cleaned up the partition table, created a new one and partitioned by hand with my favorite layout
[09:24] <SN3> at least not a stable one
[09:24] <kruemeltee> maybe I just got an old copy of the installer CD?
[09:24] <SN3> mysql workbench crashes too often
[09:27] <kruemeltee> root@kubuntu:/home/kubuntu# fdisk -l
[09:27] <kruemeltee> Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
[09:27] <kruemeltee> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders, total 312581808 sectors
[09:27] <kruemeltee> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
[09:27] <kruemeltee> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
[09:27] <kruemeltee> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
[09:27] <unopaste> kruemeltee you have been muted for 60 seconds as it looks like you are pasting lots of lines into the channel, please use http://paste.ubuntu.com and paste just the URL of your data here when you are unmuted
[09:28] <kruemeltee> http://paste.ubuntu.com/8278326/
[09:28] <kruemeltee> got it ... there's the complete output
[09:29] <lordievader> Hmm, that should be fine indeed. What version of Kubuntu are you using?
[09:30] <kruemeltee> I downloaded 14.04 LTS ... but I currently think I've got a wrong image ... got it not directly from kubuntu.org, got it from chip.de instead ... I'll download directly from kubuntu.org and try it again
[09:31] <lordievader> kruemeltee: That would be a good idea ;)
[09:31] <kruemeltee> but the stick says kubuntu 14.04.1 LTS ... seems to be the correct one
[09:32] <kruemeltee> hmm
[09:32] <lordievader> An alternative (when that one doesn't work either) is to use the mini iso.
[09:32] <kruemeltee> okay ... with text installer?
[09:32] <lordievader> kruemeltee: Yes.
[09:33] <lordievader> But it is more flexible than the regular iso.
[09:33] <kruemeltee> d'you know where to get the mini iso?
[09:33] <lordievader> kruemeltee: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/MinimalCD
[09:35] <kruemeltee> ;-) but that's ubuntu, not "kubuntu", isn't it? I'll setup this one for my brother, first steps within linux and kde is imho the best one for him
[09:36] <lordievader> kruemeltee: It's the mini iso. It is quite bare. During the installation it will download the necessary things. You can configure it to install the Kubuntu desktop rather than the Ubuntu desktop.
[09:36] <kruemeltee> cool, thanks for that hint ... I'll give it a shot ...
[09:43] <kruemeltee> pretty intresting, the minimal-installer doesn't get me my harddisk too ... this time I see sda (USB Stick) and sdc (500GB SATA) ... may be a problem with the harddisk? it's an 160GB intel SSD ...
[09:43] <lordievader> kruemeltee: You would start thinking that, ey.
[09:44] <lordievader> kruemeltee: Perhaps you can load it into a different machine, and see if it gets recognized there.
[09:44] <kruemeltee> but how's that possible? that one is on the same controller (just another connector) ... on tty2 I'm able to fdisk, see verything ... the harddisk seems to be okay
[09:45] <lordievader> Hmm, through fdisk you are able to see it?
[09:45] <kruemeltee> yap
[09:46] <kruemeltee> I'm currently thinking of installing ubuntu on the other harddisk and sync the system later on my SSD
[09:47] <lordievader> kruemeltee: If you are adventurous you could do a debootstrap install ;)
[09:48] <kruemeltee> can you give me some edge-point how to do this? I'm using archlinux on all of my machines, LPIC 2 ready ;-) ... on Arch I have to do all for myself ... but there's an option for installing base packets within another root-Document and later chroot into the new one
[09:49] <lordievader> Oh, then this shouldn't be a problem ;)
[09:49] <lordievader> kruemeltee: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebootstrapChroot
[09:53] <kruemeltee> seems to be possible ... but I think it's faster to install first on the second harddisk and later synch the installation to the ssd, isn't it?
[09:54] <lordievader> Installing it right away to the target disk seems like the fastest option to me.
[09:55] <lordievader> Anyhow I need to leave, good luck ;)
[09:55] <kruemeltee> thx for your advice and help
[10:59] <BluesKaj> 'Morning folks
[12:18] <lxdlife> hi
[14:33] <yossarianuk> hi - I have 2 GPU's on my system - an external Nvidia one (my main one)  and a intel one (ingergrated)  - the main one (nvidia) shows the desktop - the intel one just shows the kubuntu logo - how do I control what is on the2nd (intel) GPU?
[14:37] <BluesKaj> yossarianuk, usually the pci graphjics card is setup by you or default in the bios depending on the bios maker and version, suggest you check the bios peripherals or hardware settings
[14:39] <yossarianuk> BluesKaj: I meant to use both of them
[14:39] <yossarianuk> i.e they are both displaying
[14:39] <yossarianuk> but I want to know how to control what is displayed on the 2nd (intel)
[14:42] <BluesKaj> have you checked system settings>display and monitor? altho the only contro I see there is toggling between 2 outputs
[14:43] <yossarianuk> BluesKaj: yes - only nvidia is there....
[14:44] <yossarianuk> xrandr --listproviders -> shows both
[14:45] <lordievader> yossarianuk: Set it up with xrandr?
[14:49] <BluesKaj> odd there doesn't seem to be an xrandr config file
[14:50] <BluesKaj> or is this a task for xserver-xorg.conf ?
[17:24] <michalskala_> hledá se expert na virtualbox
[17:52] <BluesKaj> !es
[18:37] <nfk> some years ago it was common to hear that dist-upgrade should not be run by users, is that still valid today?
[18:37] <nfk> because it seems that apt-get upgrade will not upgrade the kernel images
[18:38] <nfk> if anyone is wondering why i'm not using muon-updater, i'm all ears on how to run it via ssh
[18:44] <lordievader> nfk: Apt is fine. So is apt-get dist-upgrade. However what I think you are talking about is do-release-upgrade, what will take you from, for example, 12.04 to 14.04.
[18:54] <nfk> is that specific to *ubuntu, i don't remember such command from my not that long months with debian years ago
[18:54] <nfk> ?
[18:54] <nfk> and thanks for explaining about dist-upgrade
[18:57] <BluesKaj> nfk, http://askubuntu.com/questions/81585/what-is-dist-upgrade-and-why-does-it-upgrade-more-than-upgrade
[19:00] <nfk> basically it's debian stupidity
[19:00] <nfk> then again, gentoo is similarly stupid but at least there it makes sense sort of with giving each kernel its own slot so that they can co-exist
[19:01] <nfk> the feature is meant for cases when mysql is replaced by mariadb yet in the debian world it's used for mere minor versions and revisions of a kernel
[19:02] <nfk> i could understand if at least it was when going from 3.2.11 to 3.2.12 but doing this for even revisions of that same 3.2.11.4 is silly
[19:03] <nfk> then again, i can't really blame kubuntu as it's debian's fault, though i was sure at least kernel was from ubuntu project
[19:04] <lordievader> nfk: No it isn't. A new kernel is a new kernel.
[19:04] <lordievader> Even a config change of the same kernel (and a recompilation) may break everything.
[19:04] <nfk> which is why you test the kernel
[19:05] <nfk> then again, this is debian we're talking about, the only distro where they give medals of honour for breaking the distro
[19:05] <nfk> everywhere else on repeated offence the commit rights are revoked
[19:07] <nfk> basically on debian everyone not running on previous stable is just considered a huge and manual and unruly testing service
[19:07] <lordievader> Jup, if debian declares something stable it really is quite stable.
[19:07] <nfk> and quite old
[19:08] <nfk> i wonder how much of debian stable software is not more than 2 years old
[19:08] <nfk> i think the kernel is about 3 yo
[19:08] <nfk> of course, they backport the hell out of it, but... that's retarded and wasteful
[19:09] <nfk> honestly, think of the amount of resources put into backporting instead of just testing and using the newest kernel, it's not like linus torvalds breaks the kernel every other release
[19:09] <nfk> but i guess debian is again showing the worst aspects of humanity and thinking others are just like them
[19:18] <BluesKaj> must be terrible to be so burdened by knowledge and unable to change the world
[21:05] <krise> does anybody know why all the images are not shown when i change my browsers color setings to dark and is there way to fix it
[21:56] <Guest31873> hey, i'm having trouble with google chrome in kubuntu.. for some reason when i click on links from a google.com search the browser fails to direct me to the page and just remains unresponsive.. same thing happens when i try to click the Search Tools button also.. I have tried everything.. doesn't anyone know anything about this bug ?