[00:03] <balloons> veebers, uitk datepickers seem happy
[00:08] <veebers> balloons: interesting, I wonder why this test (which should be similar to what's happening in the uitk tests) is failing.
[00:08] <veebers> balloons: oh wait, I should run the tests here too to be certain :-)
[00:08] <veebers> balloons: are you running them on your desktop or phone?
[00:08] <balloons> veebers, I did both. But on the phone I removed the min and max in the qml inside test_date_picker.py
[00:09] <balloons> I can confirm it doesn't blow up even after removed, which was the original bug :-)
[00:10] <veebers> heh :-)
[00:11] <veebers> balloons: to make it easy for me (because I'm lazy) which branch are you testing, I'll test it here on my desktop
[00:12] <balloons> veebers, I pulled lp:ubuntuuitoolkit
[00:12] <balloons> there's a ton in there.
[00:12] <veebers> ah right
[00:13] <balloons> the calendar tests don't use the datepicker directly, but I suspect that's the other best thing to try
[00:13] <balloons> the uitk is fine, I wouldn't worry, since it was mostly about the datepicker being correct
[00:15] <balloons> calendar app is lp:ubuntu-calendar-app
[00:17] <balloons> I don't suspect we'll see any errors
[00:20] <balloons> ^^ I was wrong
[00:31] <balloons> veebers, so calendar fails and has some problems
[00:31] <balloons> I'm just running on the desktop and running the tests in trunk
[00:31] <balloons> reading the local datetime from the qml property doesn't mess with datetime.now anymore
[00:34] <veebers> balloons: :-\ I don't understand your last comment there, 'dpesn
[00:34] <veebers> d'oh "doesn't mess with datetime.now"?
[00:35] <balloons> yea.. just pointing out they fail. .. ohh the datetime from qml property doesn't mesh with datetime.now.. in other words, the date is wrong
[00:35] <balloons> *mess=mesh
[00:35] <balloons> hehe
[00:35] <balloons> for me; local 2014-09-07 23:00:00-04:00, today 2014-09-08 20:32:55.012863
[00:36] <balloons> you can see it's about 21 hours off
[00:37] <veebers> balloons: hmm, i'm not sure off the top of my head how to attack that sorry. I also need to pop out to run some errands. I'll be back in a little bit
[00:56] <balloons> veebers, wow.. nvm.. turns out the test fails unless you are in UTC.. crazy
[01:03] <balloons> veebers, so the trunk tests fail unless run as UTC. If I swap to UTC, everyting passes under the new code and it mirrors the old
[02:06] <veebers> balloons: sorry errands took longer than expected. That's interesting, I would have to take a look at the code in libautopilot-qt to see what it's sending down the line re: dates
[02:07] <balloons> veebers, yea, you could compare before and after to see if it's the same.
[02:08] <veebers> balloons: I can't really do that right now though as I have a couple of other things to handle :-\
[02:08] <veebers> balloons: it must be getting late for you too, right?
[02:11] <balloons> veebers, I'll play with the prints another time.
=== nik90_ is now known as nik90