[07:43] <Saviq> Cimi, so, trunk never got the 0.1.16 tag, it must be local for you
[08:01] <Saviq> Cimi, actually you got it from Daniel, almost all of his branches have them
[08:02] <Cimi> Saviq, I only merged jenkins thing
[08:02] <Saviq> Cimi, you had it before then
[08:02] <Saviq> Cimi, because trunk never got them
[08:02] <Saviq> hmm I wonder, maybe the ps-jenkins branch has them, but it's not actually pushed to trunk
[08:04] <Saviq> Cimi, yeah, the jenkins branch has them, but it's actually never pushed to trunk, a local copy is
[08:06]  * Saviq expected more of an iWatch...
[08:23] <pete-woods> Saviq: hi. which packages do I need to install to make your script run?
[08:23] <pete-woods> "No handlers could be found for logger "bzr""
[08:23] <pete-woods> oh, I don't get that error if I just give it a path
[08:24] <Saviq> pete-woods, yeah, just give it a path and you're good
[08:24] <Saviq> pete-woods, you need to do this on all local checkouts and remote branches
[08:24] <pete-woods> Saviq: yes
[08:25] <pete-woods> just need to crack pawel's password (https://code.launchpad.net/~stolowski/unity8/fix-scope-tool/+merge/233345)
[08:25] <Saviq> pete-woods, yeah you do ;0
[08:25] <Saviq> pete-woods, he's on holidays is he?
[08:25] <pete-woods> Saviq: yep
[08:25] <pete-woods> I guess I'll have to re-propose that MR
[08:25] <Saviq> pete-woods, yeah, or just leave it be and I'll take care of it when it lands
[08:26] <pete-woods> Saviq: do you basically have to run that script on trunk again?
[08:26] <Saviq> pete-woods, yeah
[08:26] <pete-woods> to stop the evil tag proloferation
[08:26] <pete-woods> proliferation
[08:26] <Saviq> pete-woods, before anyone pulls them already ;)
[08:28] <pete-woods> typical that the branch I *do* have access to doesn't have the evil tags
[08:29] <Saviq> pete-woods, yeah, that's because *I* have access to it as well, and cleared them already :)
[08:30] <pete-woods> Saviq: ahh. this is why I usually use unity-api-team for stuff I don't own (so other people can fix my mess if I get hit by a bus)
[08:30] <Saviq> pete-woods, yeah, resubmitting is not that big of a deal, but agreed it's a chore
[08:30] <pete-woods> will do the resubmit, I can understand your pain
[08:31] <pete-woods> I've had to do it before with some git tags
[08:31] <Saviq> pete-woods, TBH I'd say branches within a project should be writable by peers on the driver/maintainer team or so
[08:31] <pete-woods> ended up blocking people's permissions to push tags
[08:31] <Saviq> pete-woods, at least git tags have history...
[08:31] <pete-woods> indeed!
[08:32]  * Saviq wonders if the iWatch uses electric shock for its haptic feedback...
[08:34] <mzanetti> Saviq: heh, what more did you expect from it?
[08:34] <Saviq> mzanetti, less kitsch
[08:34] <Saviq> mzanetti, same from the new iPhone really
[08:35] <Saviq> mzanetti, they totally go away from the design principles they had with Steve
[08:35] <mzanetti> yep
[08:35] <mzanetti> I was surprised it comes with lots of different wrist bands
[08:35] <mzanetti> would have expected there to be exactly 1 design
[08:37] <anpok_> but you can see the moon phase and the planetary positions.. and you can play coldplay songs.. I think that compensates for everything
[08:38] <Saviq> pete-woods, thanks
[08:38] <Saviq> anpok_, indeed
[08:38] <mzanetti> does it actually have a speaker? or is it intended to be used with Bluetooth headphones?
[08:39] <seb128> Saviq, urg?
[08:39] <seb128> Saviq, how is settings responsible for unity wrapping labels too early?!
[08:39] <Saviq> seb128, settings *components*
[08:39] <Saviq> seb128, did I assign wrong?
[08:40] <seb128> Saviq, you assigned to ubuntu-system-settings
[08:40] <Saviq> seb128, of course, sorry
[08:40] <seb128> Saviq, k, makes more sense now
[08:40] <seb128> Saviq, thanks ;-)
[08:40] <seb128> btw are those teams reading ubuntu bugs?
[08:41] <seb128> I never know if I should pick the upstream project or package
[08:41] <Saviq> seb128, convention seems to lean towards package
[08:41] <seb128> great
[08:45] <larsu> seb128, Saviq: I think mpt filed a couple of bugs recently saying to only use one of the two
[08:45] <Saviq> larsu, yup, package
[08:45] <larsu> I forget which one, but he had a good reason :)
[08:45] <larsu> Saviq: cool, thanks
[08:46] <Saviq> bug #1364477
[08:50] <seb128> Saviq, thanks for closing the upstream component :-)
[08:52] <Saviq> seb128, did that last week already, not sure how you've still been able to reassign to the project ;)
[08:52] <seb128> Saviq, I didn't, I know you read bugs on unity8 (ubuntu)
[08:53] <seb128> Saviq, but sometime I've a doubt it's true for other components
[08:53] <Saviq> seb128, I've seen one or two that were moved to the project after I've disabled it already
[08:53] <Saviq> not that it matters
[08:53] <seb128> weird
[09:20] <dednick> mzanetti: hey. do you know if the ListView currentIndex/currentItem is supposed to survive inserts into the model? (ie increment if inserted before)
[09:21] <mzanetti> dednick: hmm... good question. no. can't answer that from the top of my head
[09:22] <mpt> Saviq, seb128: That’s bug 333215, which I reported five and a half years ago :-)
[09:54] <mzanetti> anyone got a hint how to enable adb on the phone without having to use a lock?
[09:58] <anpok_> downgrade?
[09:59] <Saviq> mzanetti, not possible
[09:59] <Saviq> mzanetti, why do you want it?
[10:00] <mzanetti> Saviq: because its annoying to enter a pin every time
[10:00] <anpok_> mzanetti: maybe disable the display lock on timeout
[10:00] <Saviq> mzanetti, yeah, display on, or have a snipped calling UnityGreeter.HideGreeter
[10:00] <Saviq> *snippet
[10:01] <mzanetti> this is a device that won't leave my flat. its only here for development. shouldn't be required to have it locked imo
[10:01] <anpok_> mzanetti: but we should be dog fooding the customer configurations as we are developing the customer configuration
[10:01] <anpok_> i think it would be unrelated if we would be developing other stuff on the device..
[10:02] <mzanetti> anpok_: I dogfood customer configuration all the time. have a separate device for that
[10:02] <anpok_> s/unrelated/different
[10:02] <mzanetti> anpok_: but having to enter the pin on the developer device like 50 times a day is just a waste of time
[10:03] <anpok_> i agree, just saying that we shouldnt use completely different setups than our users
[10:08] <Saviq> mzanetti, we have no other mechanism for protecting adb
[10:10] <mzanetti> Saviq: I don't want it protected at all :)
[10:10] <Saviq> mzanetti, you'll need to talk to our security team ;)
[10:11] <mzanetti> Saviq: what would be the correct component to file a bug for this?
[10:12] <Saviq> mzanetti, try lxc-android-config
[10:13] <mzanetti> ok
[12:30] <facundobatista> Holas
[14:15] <dandrader> dednick, remember those weird errors we were getting intermittently  when running qmltests? https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-39421
[14:15] <dandrader> dednick, the "Unable to assign bool to [unknown property type]" thing
[14:15] <dednick> dandrader: yup
[14:16] <dednick> dandrader: cool.
[14:17] <dandrader> dednick, jenkins is also getting this error, making tests unstable :(
[14:18] <dandrader> dednick, our qtdeclarative doesn't have this fix. will check it adding it fixes that for us as well
[14:18] <dednick> dandrader: should be fixed in 5.3.1
[14:19] <dednick> we've got 5.3.0
[14:19] <dednick> dandrader: but there's an edgers ppa with 5.3.1 in
[14:19] <dednick> dandrader: ppa:canonical-qt5-edgers/qt5-beta2
[14:23] <dednick> hm. i just flashed my n4 and no more adb :/
[14:23] <dandrader> dednick, new security measures are in place now
[14:23] <dandrader> dednick, you have to enable developer mode in the settings app
[14:23] <dandrader> dednick, and to enable developer mode you also have to set a password over there
[14:24] <MacSlow> Saviq, this needs another look (final approval) before you're travel... -> https://code.launchpad.net/~macslow/unity-notifications/fix-1335787/+merge/227334
[14:24] <Saviq> MacSlow, kk
[14:25] <dednick> dandrader: ah. thanks
[14:25] <dandrader> Mirv, what's the ETA for us getting qt 5.3.1?
[14:26] <Saviq> MacSlow, ugh, I had an unsaved comment on this for a few weeks now
[14:27] <MacSlow> Saviq, *sigh*... taking a look now
[14:27] <Saviq> MacSlow, it's rather small
[14:29] <om26er> mzanetti, Hi! music preview in the dash is not working for me. I press the play button, the progress bar heads 1/3 of its area. No sound, nothing.
[14:29] <MacSlow> Saviq, change is up in a moment...
[14:31] <dandrader> dednick, yes, it does fix the test instability
[14:32] <mzanetti> dandrader: hey, can you perhaps review this one? https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/qtmir/fix-some-lifecycle-bugs/+merge/234087
[14:33] <dandrader> mzanetti, have you rebased agains latest qtmir trunk?
[14:33] <mzanetti> dandrader: QA keeps on asking when it'll be fixed so I'm afraid priority is quite high on it
[14:33] <mzanetti> hmm... probably not
[14:33] <mzanetti> dandrader: now I have
[14:34] <Mirv> dandrader: the original idea was "when the rush is over", and until that only cherry-picking fixes like we've done so far. but that needs a little readjustment if the rush is never over.. Qt 5.3.2 will be released next week, I'll start preparing that after that, but not sure when it's feasible to lock all the related components.
[14:35] <Mirv> dandrader: I've mentioned https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/QtTesting - 5.3.1 is available for testing (when the PPA is intact), so people have been able to verify if their problem would be fixed in 5.3.1 - so far no issues have been reported fixed in there, but 5.3.2 will represent a significant amount of fixes that could help people anyway. there's always risk of regressions though too.
[14:41] <dandrader> Mirv, thanks for the update. Sent you an e-mail about our problem
[14:48] <mzanetti> paulliu: hey, sorry...
[14:48] <mzanetti> paulliu: what's the "non-interactive" branch though?
[14:51] <dandrader> I was wondering the same :)
[14:52] <paulliu> Just, a template to indicate the scope not interact with the users.
[14:53] <paulliu> So I disable the mouse events, and the touch down effects.
[14:53] <mzanetti> ah. i c
[14:53] <paulliu> mzanetti: But hard to have some simple unit tests for that by just add mock-up data. A lot of unit tests breaks.
[14:54] <paulliu> mzanetti: I'll try to modify the template and test it and recovery it back.
[14:54] <mzanetti> oh really...
[14:55] <mzanetti> hmm
[15:08] <MacSlow> Saviq, ok... using tag-names now for https://code.launchpad.net/~macslow/unity-notifications/fix-1335787/+merge/227334
[15:09] <Saviq> MacSlow, I'd have just put the "string" column in the tags, but that's fine, too
[15:09] <MacSlow> Saviq, I wanted it to be a bit more "descriptive" :)
[15:10] <MacSlow> Saviq, reads nicely I think... http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/8310137/
[15:10] <Saviq> MacSlow, yeah kk
[15:11] <Saviq> MacSlow, ACK
[15:11] <MacSlow> Saviq, cool thanks
[15:46] <Cimi> MacSlow, did you have time to test the shadow around the notifications'
[15:46] <Cimi> ?
[15:47] <MacSlow> Cimi, no... more urgent issues came up in between
[15:47] <MacSlow> Cimi, among them redesigns
[16:07] <dandrader> dednick, need your review here https://code.launchpad.net/~dandrader/unity8/post-prompts-in-prompts-tweaks/+merge/233377
[16:10] <dednick> dandrader: did you test if that test failed when you reverted the fix i did for it?
[16:13] <dandrader> dednick, yes
[16:59] <Saviq> dandrader, you still have [u'7.85+14.10.20140428.2-0ubuntu1', u'0.1.16'] on most of your branches
[16:59] <Saviq> dandrader, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/8310947/
[20:04] <josharenson> greyback_ ?