| === Laney is now known as Guest45203 | ||
| === e11bits is now known as laza | ||
| === willcooke_ is now known as willcooke | ||
| === Guest45203 is now known as Laney | ||
| infinity | zequence: You're in -proposed, BTW, if you want to do some smoketesting. | 08:57 |
|---|---|---|
| zequence | infinity: thanks | 09:20 |
| === hito_jp0 is now known as hito_jp | ||
| === cyphermox_ is now known as cyphermox | ||
| sr105 | why is it that when I "apt-get source linux-image-3.13.0-34" and then look at the Makefile, it says 3.13.11? Same for git: "git show Ubuntu-3.13.0-34.60:Makefile" | 14:35 |
| sr105 | but "strings vmlinuz-3.13.0-34-generic | grep 3.13" yields "3.13.0-34-generic (buildd@panlong) #60-Ubuntu..." | 14:36 |
| henrix | sr105: may i ask you what were you expecting to see in the Makefile? | 14:42 |
| sr105 | 3.13.0 | 14:42 |
| sr105 | I'm just trying to patch a driver in the kernel. | 14:43 |
| sr105 | for a running system | 14:43 |
| sr105 | module, actually | 14:43 |
| henrix | sr105: the makefile simply contains the version of the last stable kernel it was applied to the kernel source. currently, 3.13.11.6 | 14:44 |
| henrix | sr105: 3.13.0-34.60 is just the ubuntu package version number | 14:44 |
| sr105 | henrix: but if I build that, uname -r will report 3.13.11.6. | 14:44 |
| sr105 | henrix: does ubuntu change the kernel version to match the package version before building? | 14:45 |
| henrix | sr105: that's because you're probably just running make && make install | 14:46 |
| sr105 | yes | 14:46 |
| henrix | sr105: take a look at the kernel wiki, it will show you how the kernel packages are actually built | 14:47 |
| henrix | sr105: you can start with https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel | 14:47 |
| sr105 | well, I definitley have a secondary goal of learning how ubuntu builds their kernels. | 14:47 |
| sr105 | my primary goal is to build a modified module that I can modprobe on an existing system | 14:48 |
| ogra_ | since you want to build an ubuntu kernel, shouldn't that be a primary goal ? | 14:48 |
| sr105 | ogra_: If I can't solve my vermagic issue, then yes building an ubuntu kernel will become my primary goal. | 14:50 |
| sr105 | henrix: thanks for the link. I was looking at 3 other, different build an ubuntu kernel links all on ubuntu.com | 14:52 |
| jsalisbury | ** | 15:09 |
| jsalisbury | ** Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting - Today @ 17:00 UTC - #ubuntu-meeting | 15:09 |
| jsalisbury | ** | 15:09 |
| wedgwood | Can anyone tell me whether the choice of the deadline scheduler for the Trusty AWS cloud-image was deliberate, or simply a holdover from the server default? Also asked in #ubuntu-server but it was suggested I ask here. | 16:27 |
| smb | wedgwood, more or less because it server and aws just use the same kernel (actually the same as desktop) and deadline had been overall better than cfq | 16:30 |
| wedgwood | smb: OK thanks. Just wanted to know before we try to outsmart you guys by using noop (as seems to be best for the environment) | 16:31 |
| smb | wedgwood, yeah the default more or less tries not to be bad for a wide range of cases. Same with the cloud-images which could override the default on the kernel command-line | 16:36 |
| jsalisbury | ## | 16:55 |
| jsalisbury | ## Kernel team meeting in 5 minutes | 16:55 |
| jsalisbury | ## | 16:55 |
| jsalisbury | ## | 17:01 |
| jsalisbury | ## Meeting starting now | 17:01 |
| jsalisbury | ## | 17:01 |
| === jsalisbury changed the topic of #ubuntu-kernel to: Home: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/ || Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting - Tues September 23rd, 2014 - 17:00 UTC || If you have a question just ask, and do wait around for an answer! If the question is should I file a bug for something, likely you can assume yes. | ||
| === broder_ is now known as broder | ||
| === sr105 is now known as sr105|away | ||
| bicepjai | : trying to load a usb driver when a particular device is hotplugged, trying to figure out what to do with rules for udev, i cannot find resources online and cannot figure it out, any help ? | 17:49 |
| === sr105|away is now known as sr105 | ||
| === sr105 is now known as sr105|away | ||
| tyhicks | rtg: hello! who should I talk to about getting a utopic-armhf chroot on tangerine? saucy-armhf is the newest armhf chroot available. | 18:54 |
| rtg | tyhicks, I've stopped supporting armhf chroots in favor of using the cross compiler | 18:55 |
| tyhicks | oh, even better | 18:55 |
| slangasek | apw_: your new linux-cloud-tools package is doing a number on our cross-toolchain builds | 18:55 |
| tyhicks | rtg: can you point me at docs on how cross compile build our kernels? | 18:56 |
| slangasek | apw_: this cloud package should not be getting built when DEB_STAGE=stage1 / DEB_BUILD_PROFILE=bootstrap is set | 18:56 |
| rtg | tyhicks, from within the appropriate chroot you can build a kernel using 'dpkg-buidlpackage -d -aarmhf -B' (for example) | 18:57 |
| tyhicks | rtg: thanks! | 18:57 |
| rtg | of course while also spelling it correcftly | 18:57 |
| tyhicks | :) | 18:57 |
| rtg | slangasek, start a bug report please, then assign apw or me to it. | 18:58 |
| slangasek | rtg: ack | 18:59 |
| slangasek | lquecy | 19:03 |
| slangasek | mmhmm | 19:03 |
| slangasek | rtg: bug #1370211 opened / assigned | 19:21 |
| ubot5 | bug 1370211 in linux (Ubuntu) "cloud package should not be built when DEB_STAGE=stage1 / DEB_BUILD_PROFILE=bootstrap is set" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1370211 | 19:21 |
| rtg | slangasek, ack | 19:21 |
| rtg | apw_, please have a look at http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-utopic.git;a=commit;h=4cdb245bfd0b79b2006cbfa5f29cc26a3b20481d to see if I have the right of it. | 19:38 |
| apw_ | slangasek, will check out rtg's thing in the am | 21:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!