[08:57] <infinity> zequence: You're in -proposed, BTW, if you want to do some smoketesting.
[09:20] <zequence> infinity: thanks
[14:35] <sr105> why is it that when I "apt-get source linux-image-3.13.0-34" and then look at the Makefile, it says 3.13.11? Same for git: "git show Ubuntu-3.13.0-34.60:Makefile"
[14:36] <sr105> but "strings vmlinuz-3.13.0-34-generic | grep 3.13" yields "3.13.0-34-generic (buildd@panlong) #60-Ubuntu..."
[14:42] <henrix> sr105: may i ask you what were you expecting to see in the Makefile?
[14:42] <sr105> 3.13.0
[14:43] <sr105> I'm just trying to patch a driver in the kernel.
[14:43] <sr105> for a running system
[14:43] <sr105> module, actually
[14:44] <henrix> sr105: the makefile simply contains the version of the last stable kernel it was applied to the kernel source.  currently, 3.13.11.6
[14:44] <henrix> sr105: 3.13.0-34.60 is just the ubuntu package version number
[14:44] <sr105> henrix: but if I build that, uname -r will report 3.13.11.6. 
[14:45] <sr105> henrix: does ubuntu change the kernel version to match the package version before building?
[14:46] <henrix> sr105: that's because you're probably just running make && make install
[14:46] <sr105> yes
[14:47] <henrix> sr105: take a look at the kernel wiki, it will show you how the kernel packages are actually built
[14:47] <henrix> sr105: you can start with https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel
[14:47] <sr105> well, I definitley have a secondary goal of learning how ubuntu builds their kernels.
[14:48] <sr105> my primary goal is to build a modified module that I can modprobe on an existing system
[14:48] <ogra_> since you want to build an ubuntu kernel, shouldn't that be a primary goal ? 
[14:50] <sr105> ogra_: If I can't solve my vermagic issue, then yes building an ubuntu kernel will become my primary goal. 
[14:52] <sr105> henrix: thanks for the link. I was looking at 3 other, different build an ubuntu kernel links all on ubuntu.com 
[15:09] <jsalisbury> **
[15:09] <jsalisbury> ** Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting - Today @ 17:00 UTC - #ubuntu-meeting
[15:09] <jsalisbury> **
[16:27] <wedgwood> Can anyone tell me whether the choice of the deadline scheduler for the Trusty AWS cloud-image was deliberate, or simply a holdover from the server default? Also asked in #ubuntu-server but it was suggested I ask here.
[16:30] <smb> wedgwood, more or less because it server and aws just use the same kernel (actually the same as desktop) and deadline had been overall better than cfq 
[16:31] <wedgwood> smb: OK thanks. Just wanted to know before we try to outsmart you guys by using noop (as seems to be best for the environment)
[16:36] <smb> wedgwood, yeah the default more or less tries not to be bad for a wide range of cases. Same with the cloud-images which could override the default on the kernel command-line
[16:55] <jsalisbury> ##
[16:55] <jsalisbury> ## Kernel team meeting in 5 minutes
[16:55] <jsalisbury> ##
[17:01] <jsalisbury> ##
[17:01] <jsalisbury> ## Meeting starting now
[17:01] <jsalisbury> ##
[17:49] <bicepjai> : trying to load a usb driver when a particular device is hotplugged, trying to figure out what to do with rules for udev, i cannot find resources online and cannot figure it out, any help ?
[18:54] <tyhicks> rtg: hello! who should I talk to about getting a utopic-armhf chroot on tangerine? saucy-armhf is the newest armhf chroot available.
[18:55] <rtg> tyhicks, I've stopped supporting armhf chroots in favor of using the cross compiler
[18:55] <tyhicks> oh, even better
[18:55] <slangasek> apw_: your new linux-cloud-tools package is doing a number on our cross-toolchain builds
[18:56] <tyhicks> rtg: can you point me at docs on how cross compile build our kernels?
[18:56] <slangasek> apw_: this cloud package should not be getting built when DEB_STAGE=stage1 / DEB_BUILD_PROFILE=bootstrap is set
[18:57] <rtg> tyhicks, from within the appropriate chroot you can build a kernel using 'dpkg-buidlpackage -d -aarmhf -B' (for example)
[18:57] <tyhicks> rtg: thanks!
[18:57] <rtg> of course while also spelling it correcftly
[18:57] <tyhicks> :)
[18:58] <rtg> slangasek, start a bug report please, then assign apw or me to it.
[18:59] <slangasek> rtg: ack
[19:03] <slangasek> lquecy
[19:03] <slangasek> mmhmm
[19:21] <slangasek> rtg: bug #1370211 opened / assigned
[19:21] <rtg> slangasek, ack
[19:38] <rtg> apw_, please have a look at http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-utopic.git;a=commit;h=4cdb245bfd0b79b2006cbfa5f29cc26a3b20481d to see if I have the right of it.
[21:50] <apw_> slangasek, will check out rtg's thing in the am