=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== ikonia is now known as Guest83023
=== Guest83023 is now known as ikonia
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
[15:06] <gQuigs> how would I mark this bug also affect "14.04", (and then I would mark the main task as fixed released) and triaged on 14.04
[15:06] <gQuigs> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1359304
[15:06] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1359304 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "draw can't start if impress is removed" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[15:11] <brendand> gQuigs, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure
[15:13] <gQuigs> "Ask the Ubuntu bug control team to nominate the bug for the appropriate Ubuntu release(s)/series" how do I do that part?    The nominate is not the option that makes sense to me
[15:14]  * gQuigs has permissions in the bug control team
[15:15] <filipsohajek> Hello, can you please set bug status to Triaged and priority to High? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcre3/+bug/1361610
[15:15] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1361610 in pcre3 (Ubuntu) "libPCRE3 8.31 regex matching is not working" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[15:17] <brendand> gQuigs, then you should be able to nominate it for Trusty
[15:17] <brendand> gQuigs, but not before proposing it for SRU
[15:17] <gQuigs> brendand: but I want to add a task for trusty, are the same now?
[15:18] <gQuigs> brendand: aka, just mark it as affecting trusty
[15:18] <gQuigs> brendand: I don't think this will be SRUable anyway
[15:21] <brendand> gQuigs, the only thing you can do is nominate it for trusty, you can't otherwise mark it as affecting a particular series
[15:22] <gQuigs> brendand: how was this done - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1160490
[15:22] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1160490 in ifupdown (Ubuntu Saucy) "race condition updating statefile" [Medium,Fix released]
[15:22] <brendand> gQuigs, by nominating it
[15:23] <brendand> gQuigs, indicating that the intention is to SRU it
[15:23] <brendand> gQuigs, you could do that, but probably nothing will come of it
[15:24] <hggdh> gQuigs: are you the one and same that just applied to Bug Control?
[15:24] <gQuigs> hggdh: indeed
[15:24] <hggdh> ok
[15:25] <hggdh> do you intend to SRU it?
[15:25] <gQuigs> hggdh: no, I don't think it merits an SRU
[15:25] <gQuigs> but, it will be fixed eventually if the libreoffice major release exception ever goes through
[15:25] <gQuigs> *will = might
[15:25] <hggdh> well, then why nominate to Trusty? A nomination to Trusty implies a SRU...
[15:27] <gQuigs> hggdh: hmm. I thought it was useful just to be clear where the bug still exists
[15:27] <gQuigs> but in that case I'll just mark it as fix released
[15:29] <gQuigs> brendand: hggdh: thanks for clarifying
[15:29] <hggdh> gQuigs: please also add a comment in that this *might* be solved on Trusty if we do a major release exception to LO
[15:29] <gQuigs> hggdh: will do
[15:30] <hggdh> thank you.
[15:30] <hggdh> gQuigs: on a clarification on you application: we usually wait 1 week to collect responses on it, and act after that
[15:31] <gQuigs> hggdh: right, got it.. thanks for the +1 :)
[15:36] <hggdh> yw
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha