/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2014/09/17/#xubuntu-devel.txt

bluesabrebrainwash: updated my lp handle, so the ppa for lp 1320560 can now be found at https://launchpad.net/~bluesabre/+archive/ubuntu/lp132056002:26
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1320560 in xscreensaver (Ubuntu) "Removal of gdmflexiserver breaks user switching" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/132056002:27
ochosibluesabre: have you seen https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11160 already? guess we need to get that fixed before 14.10 goes final...09:28
ubottubugzilla.xfce.org bug 11160 in General "Regression: No suspend on lid close" [Normal,Resolved: fixed]09:28
ochosii mean having the fix upstream is not a big deal, we just need to either cherry-pick it for 14.10 or do a 1.4.1 release for xfpm in time09:30
bluesabrehey ochosi10:04
ochosihey bluesabre 10:04
ochosiwas away for a few days, what'd i miss? 10:04
bluesabrewb10:04
bluesabredidn't miss much, eric did releases, I uploaded10:05
bluesabreand now it seems I'm adding a patch for xfpm10:05
ochosimhm10:05
ochosiyeah, sucks a bit that we overlooked that for 1.410:05
ochosibut great that you uploaded xfdesktop and xfpm10:06
ochosisaw you were able to close some bugreports with that10:06
bluesabreyup10:06
bluesabrethere might be others too that I overlooked10:06
ochosidoes the xfdeskop accountsservice patch still need fixing?10:06
bluesabrethats fixed (quite a while back)10:07
ochosiah good, i wasn't sure, just saw some mention of it in the backog10:07
ochosibacklog10:07
ochosianything else pressing on the agenda?10:07
bluesabrehm, might be another bug floating around in there based on the last comment, https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1116510:08
ochosi(i gotta head to the office now, would be back in 30mins or so, but if there's something that needs immediate attention i can take a quick look now)10:08
ubottubugzilla.xfce.org bug 11165 in General "Changing workspace don't change login screen" [Normal,Resolved: fixed]10:08
bluesabrenothing immediate to my knowledge10:09
ochosihm right, that sounds like there are some cases where it indeed doesn't work as expected10:09
ochosibut nothing too dramatic, luckily10:10
ochosibtw, have you tested light-locker1.5 already?10:11
bluesabreI haven't10:11
ochosi(we can defer that until 14.10 has been released though, since it's not going to happen before 15.04)10:11
bluesabrealso need to finish my gsettings patch to sit on top of 1.510:12
ochosimm, yeah, that'd be nice10:12
ochosithat'll make 1.6 a really nice release10:12
ochosiok, i'll cycle off now, bbiab10:13
ochosi(or would cycle away be more appropriate?)10:14
bluesabre:D10:14
ochosiback10:45
ochosithe 30mins was quite accurate then10:45
bluesabrewb, updated xfpm pushed11:02
ochosiwow, that was quick11:03
ochosislickymasterWork: thanks for setting the bug status!11:32
brainwashbluesabre: changing ppa links.. meh12:17
brainwashdid you read the latest comment? bug 132056012:18
ubottubug 1320560 in xscreensaver (Ubuntu) "Removal of gdmflexiserver breaks user switching" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/132056012:18
slickymasterWorknp ochosi 12:47
knomebrainwash, one of the reasons people use PPA's at their own responsilibity... and one of the reasons we have the PPA's that are designed to be higher traffic under the xubuntu-dev team12:49
brainwashI don't understand12:52
brainwashhe changed his lp account handle(?)12:52
brainwashhttps://launchpad.net/~smd-seandavis -> https://launchpad.net/~bluesabre12:52
brainwashno big deal actually :)12:54
knomebrainwash, yes.12:54
knomeno, it isn't.12:54
knomepeople who used his PPA's... well, they shouldn't have counted on them working forever anyway12:54
elfyind panel crashing again16:30
ochosiany debug output?16:31
elfyand the window manager16:31
elfynot currently - when it does it again I can examine locally and do the gdb thingy - or add stack trace to a bug report 16:32
elfydidn't think anyone would be about so just cancelled - which would be best the next time ochosi ?16:33
ochosiyou can also check the logs16:33
ochosidoes the whole panel crash or just the indicators?16:34
Unit193elfy: Should still have the file in /var/crash/, no?16:34
elfyochosi: just the ind's16:34
elfyUnit193: yes I know - but that's just the basic crash report16:34
Unit193I'm not getting it right now, but checkrestart says a few things are outdated (just restarted xfdesktop and xfwm to see if I'd start getting it.)16:34
elfyrebooting it 16:35
elfyochosi: so I've got crash reports for ind panel and xfwm4 from that16:38
ochosiwanna post/paste that somewhere?16:38
elfyochosi: so if I examine locally I can - run gdb session, same without downloading debug symbols or update crash report with fully symbolic stack trace16:42
elfydo you want one of those or just the report I have?16:42
ochosilet's start with what you have16:42
ochosiif that doesn't help at all, we can check gdb16:42
elfyok - well I'll keep them here so can go back 16:42
elfyyep16:42
ochosibut tbh i'm not very good at debugging with gdb :]16:43
elfysounds like voodoo to me anyway :p16:43
ochosiso just to know the context, this indicator crash has just started to appear or has it been around forever in 14.10?16:44
elfyI got one the other day - then it was fine, then today got it again - just after I'd updated 16:44
elfyhttp://pastebin.ubuntu.com/8366127/16:44
elfythat's both crash logs - xfwm4 and the ind's16:45
elfyline 813 is ind'd16:45
elfy's16:45
ochosiis that in a VM?16:46
elfynope - that's this machine16:46
ochosinot very conclusive16:47
ochosiseems its both segfaults16:48
Unit193Seems no -dbg packages, so.16:49
elfyok16:50
Unit193bluesabre: Why do we ship evince over evince-gtk?17:23
brainwashis evince-gtk something new?17:38
Unit193Pretty sure it isn't.17:44
brainwashso, it would remove some gnome deps, do we want that?17:51
Unit193Why wouldn't we?17:52
brainwashdid you test it?17:55
xubuntu92whi there, "Numix dark" is available as theme?17:55
Unit193brainwash: Switched to it recently because evince got new hard deps, works for what I need.17:57
Unit193xubuntu92w: Numix is the one we have.17:57
xubuntu92wUnit193: even in the new upcoming release?17:58
brainwashdon't you have to pay for numix dark?17:58
Unit193I believe you do, yeah.18:00
xubuntu92whow it's possible suggest to someone to add a dark theme in xfce? maybe numix dark version?!18:00
xubuntu92wbrainwash: it's like the same package18:02
xubuntu92w- like18:02
brainwashwhich package?18:02
Unit193brainwash: Do you have a specific objection then?18:03
xubuntu92wbrainwash: https://launchpad.net/~numix/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/4174259/+listing-archive-extra18:04
brainwashUnit193: it conflicts with evince or? this could be a problem18:06
Unit193brainwash: Of course it conflicts, it's "the same" package just without gnome deps.  It provides /usr/bin/evince as well, so it'd have to.18:07
brainwashso xubu should depend on evince or evince-gtk, but seed the first one18:07
brainwashehm, the second one18:07
brainwash:D18:07
Unit193Hah, OK.  I was going to ask your reasoning. :P  I agree.18:08
Unit193Well, recommend, but same difference.18:08
brainwashxubuntu92w: that's numix18:09
knomexubuntu92w, xubuntu can not include packages with proprietary software, or any software that requires you to pay a fee to get it18:09
knomexubuntu92w, it doesn't matter even if it was available for free somewhere; licensing terms are licensing terms, and we have to obey those18:10
xubuntu92wbrainwash in the gtk3 folder there is also the dark theme18:10
xubuntu92wknome: it's like ardour18:11
holsteinany developer is always welcome to address licensing, and make a project available to xubuntu/ubuntu18:11
holsteinxubuntu92w: ardour *is* open source18:11
xubuntu92weven numix i suppose18:11
holsteineven though, they sell a version.. the source is available, and its packaged18:11
xubuntu92wexactly18:12
holsteinxubuntu92w: just check with the creators/maintaners and see if they comply.. its "easier" to get things in debian upstream.. thats where i would start18:12
knomeas i said, it doesn't grant us including it in the repositories18:12
xubuntu92wnumix is gpl18:12
holsteinxubuntu92w: then show them how to get it in debian..18:12
knomexubuntu92w, there's no point arguing. we can't include it as it is.18:13
holsteinif its in debian, it'll just trickle in to ubuntu18:13
holsteinyeah.. its not the ubuntu repos.. when it is, it can be considered18:13
holsteinofficial flavors use the main repos as sources only.. 18:13
xubuntu92wok.. in my "/usr/share/themes/Numix/gtk-3.0/" there's gtk-dark.css18:14
knomexubuntu92w, that isn't the dark variant.18:15
knomexubuntu92w, the dark variant would have to have it's own directory18:15
knomexubuntu92w, the fact that some filename has the string "dark" implies nothing18:15
xubuntu92wKnome: well... now i've got it tnx18:16
knomeif you want to use numix dark, you can pay for it, and use it with the instructions you'll get18:16
xubuntu92wknome: tnx; I messed up on the Numix site18:18
knomexubuntu92w, sure18:18
xubuntu92wknome: the 14.04.1 support the gtk3 themes?18:20
knomexubuntu92w, that's a question for the support channel #xubuntu, but yes, we've had gtk3 support in the themes we support for a long time18:21
xubuntu92wknome: so why thunar depends on gtk2?18:22
GridCubebecause its a gtk2 application?18:22
knomexubuntu92w, please ask on the main support channel, this channel is for development issues18:22
xubuntu92wgridcube: so, in the theme folder there are gtk2 and gtk3 instructions for the same theme?!18:25
GridCubexubuntu92w, ask knome said, please use the #xubuntu channel18:25
* drc <action text>Sends the specifed action to all channels which you are currently on.18:47

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!