[04:50] <pitti> Good morning
[05:42] <didrocks> morning
[05:43] <mvo> hey didrocks, good morning
[05:43] <didrocks> good morning mvo, how are you?
[05:43] <mvo> didrocks: good, thanks!
[05:43] <mvo> and you?
[05:44] <didrocks> I'm great! thanks ;)
[06:37] <larsu> good morning!
[06:37] <didrocks> hey larsu
[07:08] <TheMuso> Hey willcooke, seems like things are all well with your connection. :)
[07:08] <willcooke> yeah, seems to be back on again
[07:16] <didrocks> morning willcooke
[07:18] <willcooke> morning :)
[08:05] <Laney> hey hey
[08:20] <willcooke> señor Laney - flights for the sprint.  How goes?  All in hand?
[08:20] <Laney> I'm preparing a pointy stick
[08:20] <willcooke> need me to chase them?
[08:20] <willcooke> s/need/want
[08:22] <Laney> let's see if my pointy stick is long enough
[08:26] <didrocks> waow
[08:26] <didrocks> reconciling a merge conflict
[08:26] <didrocks> git push to github
[08:26] <didrocks> even before the push command finished, https://github.com/didrocks/ubuntu-developer-tools-center/pull/25/files changed to say "you can merge automatically now"
[08:40] <michael-vb> Good morning (or whatever your time-zone says).  I wanted to ping people about LP 1353675.  Specifically about how long it is likely to take before the fix hits release versions of Ubuntu, and which versions it is likely to get into.  My reason for asking is to know whether it is worth our working around the problem in the next VirtualBox release or not.
[08:41] <Laney> michael-vb: Trevinho should know
[08:43] <michael-vb> From his nick I would guess he is located in Brazil, if he is it will probably be a while before he responds.
[08:43] <Laney> no, in Europe (normally)
[08:43] <michael-vb> Ah right.  Thanks.
[09:07] <Laney> willcooke: cooking on gas now
[09:08] <willcooke> woot, thx Laney
[11:55]  * Laney goes on a ftbfs fixing adventure
[11:59] <Laney> after lunch
[11:59] <Laney> to the crocus cafe!
[12:45] <Trevinho> michael-vb: hi (located in EU, but with some western timezone :D), I've proposed the fix fo the next compiz image that will land in utopic soon.
[12:46] <Trevinho> michael-vb: however for getting that in trusty, you should propose a branch against the compiz stable branch and we'll manage to get it released as SRU asap
[12:46] <Trevinho> michael-vb: for the SRU the time could be longer, consider some weeks (less than a month hopefully)
[12:54] <didrocks> hey Trevinho, any news on the launcher gsettings issue?
[12:54] <michael-vb> Trevinho: ah, good timing, I am just back.
[12:54] <michael-vb> Thanks.
[12:55] <michael-vb> Portugal?
[12:55] <Trevinho> michael-vb: no, italy... :)
[12:56] <Trevinho> didrocks: no, I've something higher prio to work on now, sorry
[12:56] <michael-vb> Is that a Western time-zone?  I am in Germany.
[12:56] <didrocks> Trevinho: that's been 4 months that we started discussing about it though :/
[12:57] <didrocks> Trevinho: it's hurting the ubuntu developer story core experience
[12:57] <michael-vb> So I have to check out the stable branch and back-port the change to that, then push that?
[12:58] <Trevinho> michael-vb: no, I was jocking... like that "my own timezone" does not follow sun :D
[12:58] <michael-vb> Ah right.  I am a bit slow today.
[12:58] <Trevinho> michael-vb: yeah, a branch is enough with that patch applied... THen we'll manage an SRU
[12:59] <Trevinho> didrocks: I know, but it's not the only, unfortunately :(
[12:59] <didrocks> willcooke: can you help getting bug #1364070 on the Unity7's bug list? ^
[12:59] <michael-vb> Right, got to learn a bit more bzr then... after cvs, svn and git.
[12:59] <didrocks> willcooke: basically, some people experiment no launcher icon addition at the end of the ubuntu developer tools center addition
[12:59] <Trevinho> michael-vb: nothing harder than a bzr commit and bzr push :)
[13:01] <didrocks> willcooke: last June I was told to not open a bug, but seeing nothing moving after 4 months, I preferred then to log it in (that's why I opened it recently)
[13:01] <michael-vb> Do I need to do a fresh check-out, or does bzr have something like git to switch to a branch?
[13:02] <Trevinho> michael-vb: it has, but you only need to branch the repo, then push it with another name such as lp:~machael-vb/compiz/name-of-the-branch
[13:04] <michael-vb> Actually I meant that I have already checked out trunk (or whatever bzr calls it), whether I can switch to the stable branch on that check-out or whether I need to check-out the stable branch separately.
[13:04] <michael-vb> Whatever, you probably have some on-line documentation about the work-flow.
[13:04] <michael-vb> Finding that is probably more sensible than a personal tutorial on IRC.
[13:05] <Trevinho> michael-vb: ah, no the repo is different... you need to branch a different branch... Well you also could switch to it, but you don't need it
[13:05] <Trevinho> michael-vb: just bzr branch lp:compiz/0.9.11
[13:06] <michael-vb> Thanks.
[13:07] <michael-vb> And is there a preferred way to pull the change-set over from 0.9.12?
[13:11] <GunnarHj> pitti: Re bug #1090288: It would be logical if you withdrew https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13414 or made some kind of comment.
[13:11] <willcooke> didrocks, sure I'll speak to Bregma and see what he says
[13:11] <didrocks> willcooke: thanks! :)
[13:12] <Trevinho> michael-vb: well, you can just apply your old patch (it should do it cleanly) or use bzr merge -r rev-pre..rev-actual
[13:14] <pitti> GunnarHj: good idea, done
[13:18] <GunnarHj> pitti: Great!
[13:59] <attente_> happyaron: hey, you said the fcitx MIR is just waiting on a new upstream release? do you know when that is?
[15:00] <JackYu> hi, developers, would you please help to upload a new package for Ubuntu Kylin? please see bug #1371165
[15:32] <michael-vb> Trevinho: https://code.launchpad.net/~michael-thayer/compiz/lp-1353675-compiz-0.9.11
[15:32] <michael-vb> Think I did the back-port right...
[15:36] <Trevinho> michael-vb: cool, I'll propose to the branch, thanks
[15:36] <michael-vb> Great, thanks.
[15:38] <Trevinho> michael-vb: here it is https://code.launchpad.net/~michael-thayer/compiz/lp-1353675-compiz-0.9.11/+merge/235158
[15:38] <michael-vb> Already seen!  Thanks.
[15:39] <michael-vb> Is it expected that it still says "Unmerged revisions 3867"?
[15:44] <cbaker_> anyone have any ideas as to why when trying to boot Ubuntu from USB it asks me what to do (Try without installing, install, advanced, etc) and after clicking anything, it just goes to a blank white box in the upper left hand corner?
[16:37]  * willcooke_ -> EOD
[16:38] <didrocks> see you willcooke_
[16:38] <willcooke_> l8r
[23:36] <nickoba> hello. I hope that I am in the right IRC for my question. I have setup an extended desktop successfully using xrander --right-of command
[23:37] <nickoba> I would like to setup chrome in fullscreen. When I setup fullscreen in does not expand across all monitors. Just one.
[23:38] <nickoba> Can someone help me with making chrome to expand across all screens?
[23:39] <sarnold> nickoba: does chrome respect the -geometry 1000x1000+0+0 command line argument to set the size?
[23:44] <nickoba> sarnold: I am looking into it. So are you suggesting this not settable in desktop or OS level?
[23:46] <sarnold> nickoba: some window managers make those sorts of configurations easier than others, see e.g. http://i3wm.org/docs/userguide.html#_arbitrary_commands_for_specific_windows_for_window