[02:05] <hazmat> anyone around?
[02:05] <hazmat> trying to answer some questions on ha.. there are some unclear parts in the implementation..
[21:44] <waigani> _thumper_: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/802
[21:45] <thumper> waigani: I see it, with it shortly
[21:48] <waigani> thanks
[22:14] <thumper> waigani: are you going to put that up on review board too?
[22:16] <waigani> thumper: okay
[22:38] <thumper> waigani: thanks
[22:40] <thumper> waigani, menn0: We'll have to have a lightning fast standup today, as I have to leave at about 11:05
[22:41] <waigani> thumper, sorry for the delay. I had to install python-virtualenv, create a virtualenviron, download rbt tools, create an alias to rbt tools, follow the new list of pre-pull-request steps, put in username and oauth. ... oh and then I forgot to publish the pr.
[22:42] <waigani> thumper, menn0 I can do now? Just let me get a coffee
[22:48] <waigani> thumper, menn0, davecheney got my coffee. early standup or not?
[22:48] <thumper> davecheney: can you do the standup a little early?
[22:48] <menn0> thumper, waigani, davecheney: I'm happy to do it now
[22:49] <davecheney> thumper: sure
[22:49] <davecheney> i'll jump in there now
[22:49] <waigani> I'm in
[22:57] <waigani> new record -3min !
[22:57] <menn0> waigani: yeah - pretty amazing
[22:58] <menn0> davecheney: did you want to run through that PR from Friday together?
[23:02] <menn0> wallyworld_: does the CI blocker ring any bells for you? it looks related to what axw has been working on to me. Bug 1371605.
[23:02] <mup> Bug #1371605: HP Bootstrap fails: no endpoints known for service type: product-streams <bootstrap> <ci> <hp-cloud> <regression> <streams> <juju-core:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1371605>
[23:03] <wallyworld_> um, not sure, still getting through email, so didn't notice there was a blocker yet. i'll have a read of the bug
[23:04] <wallyworld_> menn0: that's a hp loud issue
[23:04] <wallyworld_> at first read, their keystone catalog is not set up correctly
[23:04] <menn0> wallyworld_: ok so should it be blocking CI then?
[23:04] <wallyworld_> i have no idea why it was marked as a blocker
[23:04] <menn0> ok
[23:04] <wallyworld_> let me take a little more of a closer look
[23:04]  * thumper afk
[23:07] <wallyworld_> menn0: yep, hp cloud 's configuration is at fault, i'll update the bug
[23:07] <menn0> wallyworld_: sweet
[23:11] <wallyworld_> menn0: bug marked as Invalid, so hopefullt bot unblocked
[23:11] <menn0> wallyworld_: thanks
[23:11] <wallyworld_> np
[23:38] <menn0> wallyworld_: in a HA env where a state server dies, is it expected that you need to run ensure-availability twice to remove the dead state server from state?
[23:38] <menn0> I ran it once and it marked the dead one as "no-vote" and created a new state server to replace it
[23:39] <wallyworld_> menn0: i'm not sure, but that doesn't sound right to me
[23:39] <menn0> and ran it again to have it removed from the set of state servers
[23:39] <wallyworld_> maybe it was done like that to allow the dead one to come back
[23:39] <menn0> and only at that point could I remove-machine it
[23:39] <menn0> wallyworld_: fair enough
[23:39] <wallyworld_> we'd have to check with nate I think
[23:40] <menn0> dealing with dead state server is non-obvious. it took me a while to figure out how to do it.
[23:40] <menn0> wallyworld_: I might submit a documentation update
[23:40] <wallyworld_> sounds good