nopf | hi. so what's the matter with symlinks on windows? i have a project with *1* symlink which i'm willing to delete right now and make a new version -- but won't that 1 create and 2 then remove that on 'pull' on the win machine and still fail in step 1? | 08:48 |
---|---|---|
=== Spads_ is now known as Spads | ||
nopf | ok. bzr is wise enough to replay in one big step, so this works. thanks | 09:21 |
=== alexlist is now known as alexlist` | ||
Elimin8er | Im trying to build a package.. when I use checkinstall everything works great. but I want to build it with the intent of putting it on my ppa.. anyhow when I use bzr builddeb -- -us -uc, I get error at the end, take a look here: http://paste.ubuntu.com/8408128/ .. I just dont get it.. Hopefully someone can give me a pointer or two.. | 16:10 |
fullermd_ | Well, that's nothing to do with builddeb, or bzr for that matter. 's just compiler warnings/errors. | 16:16 |
=== zyga is now known as tarman | ||
Elimin8er | fullermd_, umm what can I do? anything ? | 16:21 |
Elimin8er | it works fine when I use chdeckinstall and make a nice deb file.. but I need it to package for my private ppa. | 16:21 |
fullermd_ | Fix the b0rked C code :) | 16:22 |
Elimin8er | I was thuinkjing it was the rules file.. | 16:22 |
Elimin8er | broken code? its hexchat. compiles just fine.. its the dev 2.11.0 version.. | 16:22 |
Elimin8er | just doesnt compile with bzr issued | 16:23 |
fullermd_ | Then something in the build process is using different warn flags. | 16:25 |
Elimin8er | im still pretty new to this.. anyway to debug that and see whats being passed to display that? | 16:26 |
fullermd_ | That way out of my baliwick. Something in the chain of makefiles or invocations. | 16:29 |
Elimin8er | fullermd_, thank you anyhow... and yes it seems to do the same thing in anything that I build that I know build with checkinstall or just reg. make.. | 16:31 |
fullermd_ | Yes, there's a lot of terribly b0rked an insecure C out there :) | 16:33 |
Elimin8er | so your saying bzr is more picky then everything else? | 16:36 |
fullermd_ | It's nothing at all to do with bzr. bzr doesn't know anything about any compiling of anything. It MAY be something embedded in builddeb. | 16:38 |
Elimin8er | fullermd_, yea I figured that too. I understand bzr is just a main function calling.. im thinking its the mh_make making the rules thats causing the problem.. | 16:40 |
Elimin8er | not sure though | 16:40 |
Elimin8er | seems to have problems with debian/rules area | 16:40 |
fullermd_ | And what I know about debian build processes could be written in 72 point type on one side of a grain of rice... | 16:41 |
Elimin8er | debian seems much more easier.. this is for ubuntu that seems to be picky about alot of crap. | 16:42 |
Elimin8er | even though they both use deb packages | 16:42 |
Elimin8er | and are based of the same concept | 16:42 |
fullermd_ | Obviously, the fix is to install a real *BSD O:-} | 16:43 |
Elimin8er | call me stupid but what does BSD mean? yes ill still new to all this | 16:46 |
fullermd_ | Oh, I'm just trolling a little. | 16:46 |
Elimin8er | I been working with computers since 1980 (commodore64) then PC later years.. but only messed with linux a short time. | 16:47 |
Elimin8er | I been a windows person for some many years.. | 16:47 |
Elimin8er | fullermd_, I managed to get one test project to work. I compiled qbittorrent 3.2.0alpha with no problems. | 17:29 |
Elimin8er | using the bzr package way | 17:29 |
LeoNerd | Just occasionally, I wish it was possible to have multiple independent bzr workdirs/branches in the same physical directory, each maintaining separate sets of files | 21:24 |
CcxCZ | LeoNerd: hou | 23:03 |
CcxCZ | how do you suppose it should look on commandline? | 23:03 |
CcxCZ | also; howdy :-) | 23:04 |
LeoNerd | Hmmm, yeah it'd be quite awkward I'm sure :) | 23:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!