| * infinity self-accepts his libd-i 1-liner. | 01:22 | |
| === henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
| tseliot | hi, can an admin please reject fglrx-installer-updates from precise-proposed? | 07:00 |
|---|---|---|
| dbarth | Riddell: hey Jonathan, mardy file https://launchpad.net/bugs/1378660 to clarify the purpose of the signon changes from yesterday | 07:47 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1378660 in signon (Ubuntu) "Notification appears when applications need to be (re-)authorized" [Undecided,In progress] | 07:47 |
| dbarth | or anyone in the release team willing to approve the signon package upload in the unapproved queue | 07:48 |
| dbarth | thanks | 07:48 |
| Riddell | dbarth: accepted, thanks for the extra info | 08:03 |
| Riddell | dbarth: this is surprising given the qt build-deps :) "Section: gnome" | 08:03 |
| tseliot | Riddell: can you reject fglrx-installer-updates from precise-proposed, please? | 08:05 |
| * Riddell looks | 08:06 | |
| Riddell | tseliot: rejected! | 08:09 |
| tseliot | Riddell: thanks a lot :) | 08:10 |
| dbarth | Riddell: thank you | 08:19 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| cjwatson | infinity: nice catch on libd-i. did you send that to Debian too? | 10:10 |
| cjwatson | suspect they'd want it | 10:10 |
| jamespage | Laney, could you take a peek at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceilometer/+bug/1377218 | 13:20 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1377218 in ceilometer (Ubuntu) "[FFe] ceilometer 2014.2.rc1" [High,New] | 13:20 |
| jamespage | and that would be for rc2 now; upstream just popped a new one with some fixes | 13:20 |
| Riddell | any ubuntu-sru people around able to give a second opinion on bug 1378789 ? | 13:38 |
| ubot2 | bug 1378789 in kubuntu-settings (Ubuntu Trusty) "[SRU] Set the default IO scheduler to CFQ in Kubuntu Trusty" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1378789 | 13:38 |
| Riddell | we want to sru the change in schduler back to linux defaults to keep baloo indexer working | 13:38 |
| * Riddell eyes up stgraber as a desktop minded sru member ↑ | 13:42 | |
| ogra_ | stgraber, something is wrong with system-image mirroring to the external server ... | 14:34 |
| ogra_ | stgraber, i see a krillin 91 image in www/full/ubuntu-touch/ubuntu-rtm/14.09-proposed/krillin/ ... since quite a while ... but http://system-image.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch/ubuntu-rtm/14.09-proposed/krillin/ doesnt seem to get it | 14:35 |
| ogra_ | stgraber, i even ran sync-mirrors manually on nusakan (assuming thats what s-i does as well) but with no result | 14:37 |
| infinity | rtg: The latest linux-firmware doesn't appear to contain the fix for LP: #1378491 | 14:42 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1378491 in linux (Ubuntu Utopic) "Utopic netboot initrd missing bnx2x firmware" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1378491 | 14:42 |
| infinity | rtg: What gives? :) | 14:43 |
| rtg | infinity, it was a kernel fix, which I have not uploaded yet. | 14:43 |
| rtg | bnx2x is boot essential, so it gets packaged with the kernel. | 14:43 |
| infinity | rtg: Oh, err. Really? But nic-firmware.udeb comes from linux-firmware. Is this particular one in kernel-image.udeb? | 14:44 |
| infinity | rtg: Check, okay. | 14:44 |
| infinity | slangasek: ^-- kernel fix, not l-f fix, will get done in the usual d-i respin for the new kernel. | 14:44 |
| rtg | infinity, I'll likely wrap it up and upload later tonight, or tomorrow. I did update the LP bug | 14:44 |
| infinity | rtg: Yeah, I missed that it was assigned to linux, cause someone implied it was l-f, not naming any names. :) | 14:45 |
| infinity | rtg: I guess maybe we need some machinery to check linux-image.deb and kernel-image.udeb for firmware inconsistencies and bail? If the argument for firmware in linux-image is that it's "boot essential", I can't see how that would be any less valid for the installer package. | 14:47 |
| rtg | infinity, put that on your list of things to talk to me about next week. I have some questions about how we're doing that kind of firmware, but I'm in a class right now and kind of distracted. | 14:48 |
| infinity | rtg: *nod* | 14:49 |
| infinity | rtg: Oh, I guess my consistency check wouldn't help here, as that firmware wasn't in either package. :P | 14:50 |
| infinity | And perhaps you're already doing the right thing and installing the same firmware to both packages. | 14:50 |
| rtg | infinity, nope, it was only in linux-firmware | 14:50 |
| infinity | At least, I hope you are, cause this commit doesn't seem to have anything udeb-specific. | 14:51 |
| rtg | infinity, yup, its in both now, but I'd like to fix that. | 14:51 |
| infinity | rtg: Sorry, I meant "both" as in linux-image and kernel-image, not talking about linux-firmware at all. | 14:52 |
| infinity | rtg: As in, I assume/hope that all firmware in linux-image.deb is also in the kernel-image.udeb | 14:52 |
| rtg | yes (IIRC). I'll check for sure later, but I think our packaging is consistent | 14:53 |
| infinity | rtg: Oh, hrm. No, looking at the packaging, this probably should be in nic-modules.udeb, which is defined at tree/debian.master/d-i/firmware/nic-modules | 14:53 |
| infinity | rtg: So that goes back to the consistency check arguments, I guess. We should ensure that the intersection of kernel-image, nic-modules, and scsi-modules contains the same firmware as linux-image+linux-image-extra. | 14:54 |
| infinity | rtg: Anyhow, this bug (which was agaisnt d-i) won't be fixed by your commit, as I read this. I think. | 14:55 |
| rtg | infinity, my patch is consistent with previous bnx2x firmware packaging. I'm pretty sure it'll fix the netboot issue. | 14:55 |
| infinity | rtg: Previous bnx firmware is listed in the file I pointed out. | 14:56 |
| slangasek | infinity: ah oops yes, I knew that and misspoke | 15:01 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Haven't committed that to Debian yet, as I wanted to actually do an end-to-end test and see what else is broken. :P | 15:05 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Which is somewhat hampered by the utopic kernel bumping off my test machine fairly reliably. | 15:06 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: hey, do you know why the release of indicator-network for utopic that we just triggered through the train got put into the unapproved queue? | 15:11 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: common sense told me indicator-network is not touch-specific, but I see it in my FFe I filled in | 15:11 |
| sil2100 | slangasek: which means it has to be touch-specific | 15:11 |
| slangasek | sil2100: everything goes in the unapproved queue, some things are just supposed to be let back out again semi-automatically | 15:12 |
| slangasek | sil2100: indicator-network is only in ubuntu-desktop-next and ubuntu-touch, so it's ok to unblock; but if things are getting stuck in the unapproved queue when they shouldn't, I think that's a question for #ubuntu-release | 15:13 |
| slangasek | oh, we're on that channel | 15:13 |
| slangasek | I think it's a question for infinity or stgraber ;) | 15:13 |
| sil2100 | Yeah ;) | 15:13 |
| sil2100 | infinity: ^ can you help here? | 15:13 |
| slangasek | sil2100: ^^ accepted in the meantime | 15:14 |
| sil2100 | Thanks! | 15:14 |
| slangasek | but the underlying "why'd it stick" should be looked at | 15:14 |
| infinity | The python script that does auto-accepts is a bit dumb, IIRC, and only looks at the moral equivalent of "seeded-in-ubuntu" without actually checking which seeds/packagesets something is in. | 15:15 |
| infinity | We should probably make it smarter, but also entirely reasonable to just give us a poke with "hey, this is only in touch, can you let it through?" | 15:15 |
| infinity | sil2100: ^ | 15:16 |
| Laney | It has a whitelist | 15:16 |
| infinity | Oh, so it does. | 15:16 |
| infinity | Hrm. | 15:16 |
| infinity | Clearly, that's not working right. :P | 15:16 |
| infinity | slangasek: Did you just accept everything in that state? :/ | 15:17 |
| * infinity was hoping for something in the queue he could manually run against. | 15:18 | |
| Laney | It'll be because it's in the ubuntu-desktop packageset | 15:18 |
| sil2100 | infinity: ok, thanks :) | 15:18 |
| infinity | Laney: Ahh, that would perhaps do it. | 15:18 |
| sil2100 | infinity: not sure who approved those, but those were anyway safe to land as they only had touch-specific things in them | 15:18 |
| infinity | sil2100: Some of those were auto-accepts (ie: working as designed) :) | 15:19 |
| sil2100 | Yay, well - I already knew that the auto-accept worked as I saw unity8 smoothly migrating just a moment ago, but yeah ;) | 15:19 |
| slangasek | Laney: then it sounds like keying on packageset for the queue autoaccept is the wrong thing to do? | 15:23 |
| Laney | I asked about that a few days ago | 15:23 |
| infinity | slangasek: We've generally considered it the right thing to do because "in a packageset" maps nicely to "might want extra eyes on it". Images aren't the only thing that matter. | 15:24 |
| infinity | slangasek: But this specific case is a bit more special. If only a couple of indicators are in this boat, we can just whitelist the packages for now. | 15:25 |
| Laney | Not sure why indicator-network is in ubuntu-desktop, mind you | 15:25 |
| Laney | Lemme re-run the script and see if it changes | 15:25 |
| slangasek | infinity: "might want extra eyes on it" is not the same thing as "should be frozen". Isn't everything in main in one packageset or another? | 15:26 |
| infinity | slangasek: I'm not disagreeing, just stating that stgraber's original design was meant to be more conservative than permissive, I believe. | 15:28 |
| infinity | Better to review a few extra packages than to have people break things that we really don't want broken. | 15:29 |
| infinity | But I'm sure this could use some fine-tuning. | 15:29 |
| Laney | oh | 15:43 |
| Laney | There's an ancient (2010-07-08) exception putting indicator-network in ubuntu-desktop | 15:44 |
| * Laney zzzap | 15:44 | |
| jibel | there is no desktop image since yesterday. CD build fails with cp: cannot stat `boot1/isolinux/lang': No such file or directory | 15:47 |
| jibel | make: *** [/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/scratch/ubuntu/utopic/daily-live/tmp/utopic-i386/bootable-stamp] Error 1 | 15:47 |
| jibel | could anyone look at it? | 15:47 |
| elfy | jibel: I'm assuming that all the other images would have the same error | 15:49 |
| infinity | syslinux broken? What a shock. | 15:49 |
| infinity | ... except it hasn't been uploaded since June. | 15:50 |
| infinity | jibel: Will look into it in a bit. | 15:50 |
| jibel | infinity, it could be the fix for bug 1334189 ? | 15:59 |
| ubot2 | bug 1334189 in Ubuntu CD Images "pre-boot menu offers no OEM mode on Utopic live images" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1334189 | 15:59 |
| infinity | jibel: Could well be. Haven't had a chance to look yet. Usual morning headless chickening routine. | 16:01 |
| jibel | infinity, or more likely r1899 | 16:01 |
| cjwatson | infinity,jibel: yeah, my code, I'll fix | 16:09 |
| cjwatson | bah etc. | 16:09 |
| cjwatson | ah inverted logic | 16:10 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Ta. | 16:10 |
| jibel | cjwatson, thanks | 16:10 |
| cjwatson | fixed || → &&, sorry about that | 16:11 |
| stgraber | ogra_: sorry, I'm on vacation until Friday. system-image doesn't use sync-mirrors but every run of import-images calls the ssh sync, so try running bin/import-images manually (as cdimage) and if that doesn't print an error message then it's something wrong on IS' end | 16:28 |
| ogra_ | stgraber, yeah, all solved ... nusakans / was full | 16:28 |
| stgraber | ogra_: oh, right, that doesn't help and I suspect system-image was making it worse by trying to create a bunch of stuff in /tmp | 16:29 |
| ogra_ | heh, yeah, seemingly | 16:29 |
| stgraber | I should make that configurable so we can use /srv/system-image.ubuntu.com/tmp or something like that instead of / | 16:29 |
| ogra_ | but now all is fine | 16:29 |
| ogra_ | i guess that can wait til after your vac. ;) | 16:29 |
| stgraber | yeah | 16:30 |
| ogra_ | hmm | 16:49 |
| ogra_ | the last two images expose the same issue but nusakan does have plenty of diskspace | 16:49 |
| === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!