[01:38] <harlowja> harmw yt
[07:25] <harmw> harlowja_away: sup
[15:32] <smoser> harmw, so if i mark 0.7.6 today...
[15:32] <smoser> will you push to ports ?
[17:09] <harmw> smoser: as long as I can gt my cloud back online... (with the buildstuff inside)
[17:09] <harmw> might wnt to wait just another day :)
[17:11] <smoser> harmw, ok. i know that you've been very patient. so its hard for me, but i'm impatient now :)
[17:11] <harmw> imagine how I feel now
[17:30] <harmw> harlowja: ping
[17:30] <harlowja> pong
[17:30] <harmw> ping
[17:30] <harmw> ha! I win
[17:31] <harlowja> harmw oh ya, was gonna mention that me and some others met with RH people and they were like u probably shouldn't use that rhel6->7 migration script at any large scale, lol
[17:31] <harlowja> so that reminded me of u, haha
[17:31] <harmw> hehe
[17:31] <harmw> did it on 2 machins now
[17:31] <harlowja> i don't like those meetings, they trying to sell us more stuff again :-P
[17:31] <harmw> :P
[17:31] <harmw> did they mention why?
[17:33] <harlowja> to much manual stuff i think, i didn't dig into it
[17:33] <harlowja> i was almost gonna say 'wtf u make an upgrade tool if u don't recommend people to use it'
[17:33] <harlowja> lol
[17:33] <harlowja> but i resisted
[17:33] <harmw> :P
[17:43] <harmw> hopefully, rebuilding qemu-kvm is the last step required for my hypervisor to function
[17:47] <harlowja> :(
[17:48] <harmw> since it's a poorpeople cloud, I didn't migrate all instances to some other hypervisor :)
[17:50] <harlowja> lol
[17:52] <harmw> ok, so, building qemu-kvm with the rhev flag enabled
[17:52] <harmw> just to get ceph blockdevice support in
[17:58] <harlowja> ah
[17:58] <harlowja> ya
[17:58] <harlowja> RH does that more than i like
[17:58] <harmw> uhu
[19:08]  * gholms is going to have to ship qemu-kvm-rhev, too  :/
[19:11] <harlowja> rhev, oh goodie
[19:11] <harlowja> why is that still around?
[19:13] <harlowja> doesn't that probably have like 1000 patches on it
[19:13] <harmw> 1001, yes
[19:13] <harlowja> 10 million
[19:13] <harlowja> lol
[19:14] <harlowja> qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.355 has 2858 patch files
[19:14] <harlowja> which is scary
[19:15] <harlowja> i'm pretty sure u can't call it 0.12 at that point :-P
[19:15] <harlowja> when u have more than 10 patch files its not the same version anymore, lol
[19:15] <harmw> :p
[19:16] <harlowja> especially sort of odd since RH i thought had good relations with upstream kvm/qemu?
[19:16] <harlowja> i'd of thought that if they had good relations, the number of patches would be small, but maybe i'm reading into it to much
[19:25] <gholms> You're reading into it too much.  They're all backports.
[19:26] <gholms> Version bumps for that kind of thing are rather rare in a stable release, so apparently individual patches go in instead.
[19:27]  * gholms chuckles a bit at the number of patches
[19:27] <harlowja> fair enough, although i'd not want to be a maintainer of anything with ~2500 patches, lol
[19:27] <harlowja> that would cause me to jump off building, lol
[19:27] <gholms> Well, when you have git or quilt or whatever it isn't really that bad.
[19:33] <harmw> hm, now why isn't qemu-img listing rbd as supported format :|
[19:34] <harlowja> harmw i'm pretty sure thats compiled out
[19:34] <harlowja> or not compiled in...
[19:35] <gholms> Did you also install librbd1?
[19:38] <harlowja> i think if u are compiling qemu your self u have to also do --block-drv-rw-whitelist=rbd (and a bunch of other stuff)
[19:41] <harmw> harlowja: I defined rhev 1, so that should've been tken care of
[19:42] <harlowja> hmmm, ok, no idea what that does, lol
[19:42] <harlowja> i just know i see http://paste.ubuntu.com/8528714/ in a version of the qemu-kvm spec file
[19:42] <harmw> though it looks like I defined that the wrong way
[19:44] <harmw> %if %{rhev} --enable-live-block-ops \ --enable-ceph-support \
[19:44] <harmw> %else
[19:44] <harmw> thats the magicstuff
[19:45] <harmw> but for some reason my old faithfull buildscript doesn't define rhev as 1
[19:45] <harlowja> hmmm, okie okie
[19:45] <harmw> so if that fails, ill just patch the spec
[19:45] <harmw> which is overkill, for what I'm after here
[19:46] <harmw> but hey, if it's about openstack, everything is allowed!
[19:46] <harmw> :p
[19:46] <harlowja> :-P
[19:49] <gholms> I juat grab the qemu-kvm-rhev source package from them and build that.
[19:50] <gholms> (Yes, the only difference is the flag at the top.)
[20:01] <smoser> harlowja, patches are just a different name for commits
[20:02] <smoser> what is the difference between upstreams 30,000 commits and a distros version-X+30 commits ?
[20:06] <harlowja> who knows, lol
[20:07]  * hiren_ forked early this week. Baby things will keep him away for a few weeks at least. :-)
[20:15] <harmw> hiren_: +1 on that
[20:15] <harmw> forked without bugs I hope?
[20:16] <hiren_> So far, so good.
[20:16] <hiren_> thanks.
[20:16]  * hiren_ -> away
[20:16] <harmw> and this was a private branch of yours?
[20:16] <harmw> :p
[20:17] <gholms> Awwww
[20:17] <gholms> Also, eww.
[20:17] <gholms> :P
[20:19] <harmw> :P
[20:22] <harlowja> hiren_ pretty sure u don't need a fork to get cloud-init into y! 
[20:22] <harlowja> so hopefully shouldn't need such a thing, some patch files might be ok (but not ~2500 files, thx)
[20:22] <harlowja> so maybe u are just meaning u cloned from bzr or soemthing?
[20:23] <harmw> you rly not getting the joke here are you
[20:23] <harlowja> oh
[20:23] <harlowja> i get now
[20:23] <harlowja> u guys sux
[20:23] <harlowja> lol
[20:23] <harmw> :>
[20:26] <gholms> Haha
[20:39] <harmw> ok, qemu is rbd aware and just booted instance #1
[20:39] <harmw> now to fix the networking part of this hypervisor