| === CyberJacob is now known as CyberJacob|Away | ||
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| bigjools | jtv: just landing a packaging fix now | 04:56 |
|---|---|---|
| jtv | Thanks | 04:56 |
| bigjools | jtv: it's in | 05:07 |
| jtv | bigjools: sent you my draft reply. | 05:13 |
| bigjools | jtv: looking | 05:15 |
| jtv | bigjools: could I bother you for a review? https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/maas/bug-1379568/+merge/237893 | 05:46 |
| bigjools | jtv: doing one already but I'll take a look | 05:47 |
| jtv | Thanks. | 05:50 |
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| bigjools | gmb: instead of the red error banner, do you think a separate oops page would be better? | 06:01 |
| bigjools | it confused me until I realised what was going on | 06:01 |
| === CyberJacob|Away is now known as CyberJacob | ||
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| === CyberJacob is now known as CyberJacob|Away | ||
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| gmb | bigjools: If the red error banner is confusing, then yes, we should do something different. I think we have a chunk of work to do on error reporting, actually: at the moment errors that happen in bulk actions are barely reported at all (just "couldn't be executed on N nodes:"). | 07:59 |
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| jtv | Any reviewers available? | 09:37 |
| jtv | rvba: I'll also need landing approval, but I'm going to run some local Q/A first. | 09:37 |
| allenap | jtv: I want to get my branches on the way to landingdom, then I’ll get stuck into your reviews. | 09:51 |
| jtv | Thanks! | 09:51 |
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| jtv | allenap: thanks for the swarm of reviews. | 10:11 |
| allenap | jtv: You’re welcome. The code was good so it was easy. | 10:13 |
| jtv | Thanks. Really making a point of facilitating reviews. | 10:16 |
| gmb | allenap, jtv, (rvba): Review needed when you have chance gents: https://code.launchpad.net/~gmb/maas/bug-1379154/+merge/237936 | 10:35 |
| jtv | I'll take it. | 10:35 |
| gmb | Thanks | 10:35 |
| * gmb -> moar tea | 10:37 | |
| gmb | jtv: Gah, I missed the ", you"! But yay, made you look :) | 10:53 |
| gmb | Thanks for the review :) | 10:54 |
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| zezom | I'm currently running proxmox at home on a single server + NAS but I'm quite impressed with what I've seen MASS + JUJU do. Unfortunately I am unable to tell if I can run MAAS, JUJU and my virtuals all on a single server. I would like the ability to add more servers in the future but for now one server is all I have. I've read through the MAAS install doco on ubuntu.com but it doesn't say if the MASS controller install can run any virtual's on i | 11:22 |
| zezom | t's self or if it's only used to bootstrap other nodes to run virtual's. | 11:22 |
| zezom | I also have a Ubuntu desktop but I shut it down when not in use. | 11:24 |
| rbasak | zezom: no need for MAAS at all if you only have one server. You can just use Juju on it directly, and Juju can create VMs or containers as needed. | 11:28 |
| rbasak | zezom: you can use the "manual" Juju provider for this. Or the "local" provider if you never want to go beyond one server (it's a bit easier). | 11:29 |
| zezom | rbasak, that's great. and in the future I can install maas when required? | 11:29 |
| rbasak | For just a small handful of servers, the "manual" provider should be fine. | 11:29 |
| rbasak | Beyond that, to switch to MAAS, you'll need to redeploy to a new MAAS environment. | 11:30 |
| zezom | should I install the cloud version of the Ubuntu server image then? Or just the standard server image? | 11:30 |
| rbasak | For the manual or local providers, just the standard server image will be fine. | 11:30 |
| rbasak | If local, bootstrap Juju from the server itself. If manual, I think you can bootstrap it from your desktop. | 11:30 |
| rbasak | Hmm. | 11:31 |
| zezom | when you say redeploy will that mean I'll have to recreate the setup? or I can just move the setup to the new hardware after presenting it to the existing juju? | 11:31 |
| rbasak | If you want to manage the deployment from your desktop, the manual provider might be easier in that case. | 11:31 |
| rbasak | Anyway, #juju would probably be more relevant for this conversation. People there know more than I do about this. | 11:31 |
| rbasak | You'll have to recreate. | 11:31 |
| rbasak | Juju has functionality that makes this easier though, with backup/restore stuff (I'm not familiar with it though) | 11:32 |
| zezom | thank you for the info. it's appreciated. | 11:32 |
| gmb | rvba, https://code.launchpad.net/~gmb/maas/bug-1379154/+merge/237936 needs approval for landing when you have a moment. | 11:45 |
| jtv | And a bunch of mine as well... | 11:50 |
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| rvba | gmb: just reviewed your branch. | 12:08 |
| gmb | rvba: thx | 12:08 |
| jtv | rvba: could you review landing-approval-review mine as well? | 12:09 |
| rvba | jtv: doing it now | 12:09 |
| jtv | I've got 4 up, but they're not big. | 12:09 |
| jtv | Thanks. | 12:09 |
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| gmb | jtv, rvba: https://code.launchpad.net/~gmb/maas/fix-register_event_and_event_type-bug-1379401 needs reviewing if you have the time and bandwidth. | 13:29 |
| gmb | allenap: ^^ | 13:29 |
| allenap | gmb: I have spare girth in my band. | 13:30 |
| jtv | Simple documentation review: https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/maas/update-ipv6-limitations/+merge/237982 | 13:54 |
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| * gmb -> out; errands. Back later | 14:02 | |
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| th3rt | I'm trying to use MaaS to setup some super micro nodes with the IPMI on a separate maas network. I can't seem to get MaaS to associate the IPMI interfaces with the correct host (I think because they are on a different network in MaaS). Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? | 14:44 |
| jtv | th3rt: having them on a separate network should be fine. No idea what could be going wrong there. | 14:46 |
| th3rt | If I delete all the nodes from MaaS, how can I get MaaS to re-discover the nodes? | 14:47 |
| th3rt | ... or is that the wrong thing to do. I didn't set this MaaS server up originally (and have never used MaaS before) so I'm not sure how the discovery process works once a node has been deleted. | 14:48 |
| jtv | th3rt: as long as they're set to netboot, just turn them on. | 14:48 |
| jtv | Assuming you're letting MAAS manage DHCP, and letting the nodes netboot, | 14:49 |
| jtv | turning a node on will netboot it off the maas server. | 14:49 |
| jtv | It will boot into an ephemeral image that registers the node with the server. | 14:49 |
| th3rt | jtv, thanks much. That helps. I am letting MaaS manage DHCP. | 14:51 |
| jtv | np | 14:51 |
| === CyberJacob|Away is now known as CyberJacob | ||
| === roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk | ||
| === danwest_ is now known as danwest | ||
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
| === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr | ||
| DominiKiD | can anyone help me with my maas configuration? | 22:57 |
| DominiKiD | i beent ryign to do this for weeks and i have no clue of what im doung.. | 22:57 |
| DominiKiD | doing | 22:57 |
| DominiKiD | i been trying to make my own home server and add a node | 22:58 |
| DominiKiD | i installed mass on one of the computers | 22:58 |
| DominiKiD | and eveyrthign seems to be working.. | 22:58 |
| DominiKiD | now i dont have a blue how to configure the dhcp | 22:58 |
| DominiKiD | the clusters | 22:58 |
| DominiKiD | help enyone? | 22:59 |
| === jfarschman is now known as MilesDenver | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!