=== ccarella is now known as ccar_away [02:00] berglh, so a pretty easy place to start would be syncing some debian packages for gnome3-staging [02:00] take a look at http://phillw.net/ubuntu-gnome/utopic314.html [02:01] look for packages in the Ubuntu Column that don't have "ubuntu" in the version number [02:02] in this case you can just copy the debian package [02:02] grab the debian source package (pull-debian-source) [02:03] add a new changelog entry "copied from Debian", add "~utopic1" to the debian version [02:04] then test build (sbuild) and upload to a ppa and we can copy them === ccar_away is now known as ccarella === ccarella is now known as ccar_away [07:00] darkxst, Is there a script to sync all syncable package to the staging PPA? [07:00] *packages [07:01] No [07:05] this is actually the first time debian has been ahead of us really, so it was never needed [07:06] I guess the upcoming release really motivate them [07:10] Would you be able to make it or should i try? [07:10] Since i think the script would be pretty useful [07:11] nvm, http://jeremy.bicha.net/2011/10/09/how-to-sync-packages-from-debian-to-your-ppa/ [07:26] Noskcaj, https://bug728319.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=286996 should be backported to utopic and trusty (see debiain changelog) [07:30] there was a lp bug for that somewhere [07:30] maybe under synaptic [07:31] bug 1328586 [07:31] bug 1328586 in at-spi2-core (Ubuntu) "Synaptic is reading state information for a minute or so" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1328586 [07:32] Is it too late for this to be just uploaded as a bugfix to utopic? [07:34] actually only affects utopic [07:35] probably too late to update to the debian package [07:35] but not too late to backport patch into current package [07:39] I'll have a merge up soon, need dinner first. Also, is 3.14.0-1~ubuntu14.10.1~utopic1 an ok version name for the ppa or do i need to try and patch backportpackage? [07:40] that is crappy for a sync [07:41] I already merged at-spi2-atk for ppa, but you can backport the patch to utopic [08:06] https://code.launchpad.net/~noskcaj/ubuntu/utopic/at-spi2-atk/git-bugfix/+merge/238110 [08:59] darkxst, Can you reply to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376452 [08:59] Ubuntu bug 1376452 in ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu) "[UIFe] Update Ubuntu-GNOME slideshow artwork" [Undecided,New] [09:00] Laney acked it for the release team, just checking for docs team stuff [09:54] darkxst, :\, please dont pocket copy things from utopic to trusty! [09:54] do proper rebuilds with a new suffix [09:55] this is really bad [10:08] besides that we didnt agree on adding 3.14 bits to trusty [10:09] ricotz, hmm right, that was silly [10:09] though its only a few games that are 3.14 [10:14] and they all work fine with gtk 3.12 [10:17] dont get sloppy and preserve a sane upgrade path [10:18] 3.14.1 might be a chance to fix those ~utopicX in trusty [10:18] but of course there are conflicts now [10:19] what If i bump the versions in gnome3, that should avoid conflicts? [10:20] you need to bump the utopic builds [10:20] yes that is what I meant [10:21] i am keeping the trusty and utopic pockets added to my sources.list which should result in a consistent pool [10:21] the most offending package is "gnome-color-manager - 3.12.2-1ubuntu1~utopic1" [10:23] darkxst, some games are written in vala right? [10:24] so they also benefit and might even require vala 0.26 which isnt intended to be available to trusty [10:33] most are c, though a few might be vala [10:43] ok [13:10] hi all === prth is now known as prth|away [14:27] hello is any one here and able to help me === ccar_away is now known as ccarella === ccarella is now known as ccar_away [19:46] darkxst, If something is in the gnome3 ppa, should an identical version be in gnome3-staging? === ccar_away is now known as ccarella [20:00] Also, i've got a few more packages ready in my copy PPAs === ccarella is now known as ccar_away [20:41] Noskcaj, no, gnome3 is a dependency for -staging [20:42] ok, i'll just leave robots 3.14.1 in gnome3 then [20:42] One other thing, do we want gnome-software or is the offline install bug too much? [20:43] but 3.14 -staging packages should be based of gnome3 merges where they exist (probably keeping the 3.12 changelog entry) [20:44] we do want gnome-software, offline updates can just be disabled [20:44] however it requires a few other bits like packagekit, appstream-glib [20:46] Noskcaj, can you delete the packages that are already copied [20:46] ok [20:50] Noskcaj, I synced cantarell to ubuntu (yesterday) [20:50] ok, i missed that. sorry === ccar_away is now known as ccarella === ccarella is now known as ccar_away === ccar_away is now known as ccarella === ccarella is now known as ccar_away [22:13] Noskcaj, probably best to keep the autoreconf in gnome-dictionary === ccar_away is now known as ccarella === ccarella is now known as ccar_away