[03:39] <darkxst> bug 1376452 seems to have been missed by the release team? I can't imagine that would require approval from the docs team?
[03:39] <ubot2> bug 1376452 in ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu) "[UIFe] Update Ubuntu-GNOME slideshow artwork" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1376452
[13:37] <zul> ^^^ can someone approve the new python-lxc it needs to be rebuilt against the newer lxc
[13:38] <cjwatson> no packageset -> automatically accepted
=== georgelorch2 is now known as georgelorch
[19:14] <tkamppeter> Hi, a hardware manufacturer wants to have the addition of a feature of 14.10 to a package of 14.04, is it possible to issue an SRU for this? Or how should I proceed?
[19:25] <ScottK> tkamppeter: What package?
[20:04] <tkamppeter> ScottK, cups-filters and system-config-printer, the manufacturer wants the full IPP Everywhere and IPP-over-USB support of 14.10 in 14.04.
[20:05] <ScottK> Hardware enablement in an LTS can be a valid SRU reason.
[20:05] <ScottK> So file a bug with a detailed explanation and a debdiff and let the SRU team review.
[20:06] <tkamppeter> OK, so then we can do it this way.
[20:06] <ScottK> It depends a bit on how invasive it is.
[20:06] <tkamppeter> ScottK, thanks, then I will do it this way.
[20:08] <tkamppeter> ScottK, do I have to tell in the bug who the m,anufacturer is (and make the bug private then as I cannot talk about this in public)?
[20:08] <ScottK> With the patch, won't it be pretty obvious who it is anyway?
[20:08] <tkamppeter> ScottK, or can I simply open a public bug and say "a hardware manufacturer wants ..."?
[20:09] <ScottK> Try that first.
[20:09] <tkamppeter> ScottK, it is support for a new manufacturer-independent standard and one manufacturer wants it to be in the LTS.
[20:11] <tkamppeter> ScottK, by the way, here is a web page about the IPP Everywhere standard: http://www.pwg.org/ipp/everywhere.html
[20:12] <ScottK> Depending on how invasive the patch is, seems like a good thing to have.
[20:13] <ScottK> Worst case we can put it in backports (which is enabled by default, people would just have to ask for the package from backports when they install)
[20:14] <tkamppeter> OK, thank you very much.
[21:19] <xnox> we don't need 3 lightdm in trusty unapproved queue, do we? =)
[22:11] <barry> ScottK: LP: #1380814
[22:11] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1380814 in tox (Ubuntu) "[FFE] tox 1.8.0-1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1380814
[23:26] <cjwatson> could somebody review livecd-rootfs 2.255?  I'm trying to coordinate a landing there (plan in https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/livecd-rootfs/split-custom-tarball/+merge/237905) and it would be very helpful to be able to attempt the first couple of steps while the US is on holiday