[00:11] <ScottK> barry: Ack'ed.
[00:18] <barry> ScottK: thanks, i'm subscribed
[00:19] <ScottK> I suspected you might be.
[00:19] <ScottK> Carry on then.
[00:20] <bluesabre> ScottK, can you release menulibre, xfce4-weather-plugin, and xfdesktop4 into trusty-proposed?
[00:21] <ScottK> Maybe later.
[00:21] <bluesabre> ok, otherwise I'll reach out to RAOF and arges tomorrow morning
[00:21] <bluesabre> thanks :)
[10:08] <JackYu> hi, release team, would you please review ubuntu-kylin-software-center and youker-assistant in the queue?
[11:28] <tkamppeter> I have a question about the fix for bug 1366756 in Utopic. The easiest way to fix this is to let system-config-printer depend on smbclient (see comments #5, #6, and #7). Can I do it with the Utopic package and upload it to Utopic today or should I make an SRU for Utopic?
[11:28] <ubot2> bug 1366756 in system-config-printer (Ubuntu) "system-config-printer.py crashed with FileNotFoundError in _execute_child(): [Errno 2] Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden: 'gpk-install-package-name'" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1366756
[11:50] <infinity> tkamppeter: Ideally neither.
[11:51] <infinity> tkamppeter: We've done okay for years without a dependency on smbclient, why can it no longer be installed on demand?
[11:58] <Laney> JackYu: It's hard to review UKSC without a proper list of changes - could you ask Shine to write more verbose ones in the future please?
[12:06] <JackYu> Laney, sure, thanks for comments:).
[12:09] <cjwatson> we've commented on this in kylin uploads before; it has made no visible difference :(
[12:10] <Laney> Could reject and ask for a new one ...
[12:16] <JackYu> cjwatson, laney, I just told Shine and it would not happen next time.
[12:16] <JackYu> And I also told other developers in our team.
[12:23] <ara> infinity, 14.04.1 is now in releases.ubuntu.com, but 14.04.0 hasn't been moved yet to old-releases, is that normal?
[12:25] <infinity> ara: No, that's not normal, per se, but in both the case of the 12.04.5 and 14.04.1 releases, we didn't get the website updated in sync with the file availability, so we had the files overlap.
[12:25] <infinity> ara: And then stgraber and I forgot to fix the mirrors. :P
[12:26] <infinity> ara: Thanks for the reminder.
[12:26] <ara> no worries, it breaks the download links in the cert site, that's how we notice :)
[12:30] <infinity> ara: We'll get it fixed this week.
[12:30] <ara> infinity, thanks!
[13:00] <jibel> infinity, when will utopic final be on the tracker?
[13:00] <tkamppeter> infinity, before smbclient was installed on-demand, now it seems that the tool used for it all the time got removed from Ubuntu. The tool seems to be "gpk-install-package-name", which was a part of PackageKit. Is there a successor for this tool?
[13:04] <infinity> jibel: Friday, before we all travel around the planet.
[13:04] <infinity> tkamppeter: I have no idea, but I have a hard time believing there's no way to do it.
[13:04] <infinity> tkamppeter: I'd ask mvo, perhaps.
[13:05] <jibel> infinity, good, I'll have all time to test during the trip. thanks!
[13:06] <tkamppeter> infinity, thanks.
[13:08] <cjwatson> tkamppeter: https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-packagekit/commit/?id=bdeaf7f35511fa85d444deb9981d68e015acdea6 implies that there is still a D-Bus API you can use
[13:09] <cjwatson> gpk-install-package-name only appears to have been a thin program wrapper around it
[14:13] <rcj> arges, You uploaded cloud-init for Bugs #1363260 & #1336855. They were verified a 8-11 days ago.  Who do I ping to get them out of -proposed?
[14:13] <ubot2> bug 1363260 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "[SRU] add cloud-init datasource for Cloud Sigma to 12.04" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1363260
[14:14] <arges> rcj: i can take a look.
[14:14] <rcj> arges, thanks
[14:18] <arges> rcj: was bug 1363260 fixed in utopic?
[14:18] <ubot2> bug 1363260 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "[SRU] add cloud-init datasource for Cloud Sigma to 12.04" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1363260
[14:19] <arges> rcj: and is it only needed for precise?
[14:19] <arges> and fixed in trusty?
[14:20] <rcj> arges, trusty package is also in proposed (0.7.5-0ubuntu1.3) from bug #1336855
[14:20] <ubot2> bug 1336855 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Trusty) "[SRU] non-interactive grub updates broken for /dev/xvda devices on Cloud-Images/Cloud-init" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1336855
[14:20] <rcj> arges, that bug also tracks utopic which has the fix released
[14:21] <arges> rcj: ok
[14:32] <sil2100> kgunn: ping
[14:33] <kgunn> sil2100: yo
[14:33] <sil2100> kgunn: so, I heard that you have a separate trunks for mir utopic and 14.09, right?
[14:34] <ogra_> oh man
[14:34] <kgunn> sil2100: well...this is where we get into use of words and their meanings....
[14:35] <kgunn> we have a development-branch which the engineers review and land things on without silo testing, that is frequently promoting to a branch that we would consider "the active archive target" aka trunk
[14:36] <kgunn> we always silo test those stable branches regardless
[14:36] <cjwatson> pretty sure that by "trunk" sil2100 means "the branch that's supposed to match the archive"
[14:36] <kgunn> until a week ago utopic & rtm were the same thing, no delta, same exact branch (and likely still are at mir8.0)
[14:37] <cjwatson> kgunn: they're one branch apart right now, the arm64 fix
[14:37] <cjwatson> it would be helpful to sync them up
[14:37] <kgunn> cjwatson: ack
[14:37] <cjwatson> rmadison mir
[14:37] <sil2100> So, yeah, we wanted to release the arm64 fix into rtm now, actually at first I just wanted to do a sync landing
[14:38] <sil2100> Since trust-store needs that version and that would be the fastest way
[14:38] <kgunn> sil2100: ok, a sync landing should totally be possible
[14:38] <kgunn> from our end
[14:40] <LocutusOfBorg1> BTW, there is an old lucene++ that doesn't even build, and the new one on debian should fix all of the issues
[14:40] <LocutusOfBorg1> there is a rm against the only package using lucene++, what about remove and sync?
[14:41] <LocutusOfBorg1> bug  1245105
[14:41] <ubot2> bug 1245105 in lucene++ (Ubuntu) "[please sync lucene++ from debian] Mysteriously FTBFS on the distro builders" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1245105
[14:41] <LocutusOfBorg1> bug 1334234
[14:41] <ubot2> bug 1334234 in mediascanner (Ubuntu) "Remove Mediascanner from the archive" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1334234
[14:42] <sil2100> kgunn: ok, so you would be fine with syncing mir 0.8.0+14.10.20141010-0ubuntu1 to ubuntu-rtm?
[14:42] <sil2100> kgunn: a binary copy sync?
[14:45] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg1: removal processed
[14:45] <kgunn> :) already here
[14:46] <camako> yep
[14:46] <LocutusOfBorg1> thanks, cjwatson do you think we can sync?
[14:46] <kgunn> sil2100: so camako has already built & testsed a sync silo for rtm
[14:46] <kgunn> it's waiting on Q
[14:46] <kgunn> A
[14:46] <LocutusOfBorg1> this way I'll able to look at an eventual build failure
[14:46] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg1: I don't know and don't have time to check now; throw it into the sponsorship queue I guess
[14:46] <LocutusOfBorg1> I subscribed ubuntu-sponsors, so should be fine, right?
[14:46] <cjwatson> I suppose so
[14:47] <camako> sil2100, it's rtm silo 1...
[14:47] <camako> and in the QA queue for signoff
[14:47] <ogra_> well
[14:47] <ogra_> it blocks other landings that have been signed off already
[14:48] <LocutusOfBorg1> thanks!
[14:48] <ogra_> Mirv claimed in the other channel there are no code differences at all
[14:48] <ogra_> only version numbers
[14:49] <camako> ogra_ correct ...  there is one test code fix for arm64 arch that RTM doesn't have anyways.. so yes same code that's already in RTM...
[14:49] <ogra_> right
[14:49] <kgunn> ogra_: sil2100 so if we hot-shot the mir RTM landing with QA....that would unblock the queue
[15:06] <kgunn> sil2100: is there anyway we can get that mir rtm landing into an image today ?
[18:19] <ChrisTownsend> I have a package (unity8-lxc) in NEW that has been approved for a FFe (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1372930).  Is there an archive admin available that can help get this promoted?
[18:19] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1372930 in Ubuntu "[FFE] [needs packaging ] unity8-lxc" [Wishlist,In progress]