=== knome_ is now known as knome === meetingology` is now known as meetingology === czchen_ is now known as czchen === Guest97591 is now known as Guest20083 === fader_ is now known as fader === Guest20083 is now known as Ursinha [06:23] good morning jibel :) [12:18] so RC is built today balloons [12:18] oh good lord [12:18] was 5 minutes ago [12:19] now Final is ready for testing ... [12:20] blaming stgraber and Riddell for confusing me with that :D === rfinley is now known as average_guy [13:34] woot, builds are going to be on time [13:59] balloons, hi .. finally it worked :) [14:06] senan, I had trouble running it without that package, the konsole-plugin [14:07] balloons, After adding the ppa, installed everything you mentioned..all is well :) [14:07] senan, hehe, great [14:07] balloons, so whats next ? [14:08] balloons, how do I enter commands in that > [14:08] ? [14:09] senan, so the next step is to update the tests to support the UI change. Let me find the MP [14:10] balloons, I'll be back after dinner :) [14:10] senan, https://code.launchpad.net/~flscogna/ubuntu-terminal-app/uri-and-tabs/+merge/237353 [14:11] senan, so in trunk the tests work and pass of course, but that MP changes the UI layout. The developer could use some help in changing the tests as well [15:57] balloons: I got completely confused by it all - I now assume your post to mean "Once the pre-testing RC/Final phase is over - the end of the week/weekend will see it released" [15:57] elfy, now I'm confused :) [15:57] We're just about a week away from the first RC images for utopic hitting the image tracker. [15:57] you said that [15:58] no we're not - we're not even getting one - the first final image was there today :) [15:58] anyway - not important === roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk [18:18] balloons, elfy: do you guys want to set some "importances" for the iso tracker bugs? about 50% of the bugs have no importance set... [18:19] dkessel: waiting for my application to bugcontrol to be approved and then i'd be happy to help :) [18:19] 99% of them would be non-Xubuntu I would guess and nothing to do with me [18:21] oh so xubuntu is only 1% flawed, huh? ;) [18:21] no - not at all - only about 5 people have reported via tracker :( [18:21] yeah well i know that feeling :( [18:21] so - 98% aren't X/L/ubuntu :p [18:22] heheheh [18:22] althugh kylin appears to produce about 90% of them, 80% of which aren't in any sort of western language at all :) [18:22] lol [18:23] dkessel: other than vbox issues - afaik only one Xubuntu iso bug - and that's appearances only [18:24] though I am sure that on the 24th loads of people will find loads of bugs - too late by months [18:24] dkessel: you might want to send something out to the bugsquad if you really want something to happen generally [18:25] dkessel, bugs for the tool or bugs from testing? [18:26] balloons: bugs for the tool. I forgot the link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/+bugs?orderby=importance [18:28] dkessel, in that case yes indeed there is importance. knome elfy , can you link the the pad you made? [18:28] * balloons looks for it [18:32] * elfy lost that [18:33] but frankly they should all be high imo [18:33] anything that negatively impacts our ability to do testing should be high [18:34] however, better reporting tools, for the sake of being honest, i'd call medium [18:35] balloons: found it :) http://pad.ubuntu.com/trackers [18:35] dkessel, there you are ^^ [18:37] wxl: the thing is I would have guessed (and guess it is) that fixing one will make the rest a bit simpler [18:41] dkessel: and I can't set importance by the way - not important enough for that :) [18:41] oh ok [18:42] bugsquad I guess - not getting involved in that [18:44] bugcontrol [18:44] bugsquad can't set importance [18:44] If I were to start on working on any of this in my "qa tracker hacking week", then I would order bugs by importance and then... add a favicon to the page? ;) [18:44] it's the little subteam of bugsquad that can [18:44] ooh qa tracker hacking week [18:44] i likes the sound of that!!! [18:45] heh.. I just made it into bug-control.. most of the undecided look like medium or low to me.. are their any that you know are high? [18:45] wxl: that then - just replace control and squad - sentiment will remain the same [18:45] elfy: :) [18:46] gQuigs: the bugs we're talking about on the tracker? they might look medium to low to you - try wanting to get information out daily and you'll soon see they're all high ;) [18:48] elfy: so you would want bug 1126449 to have high importance? maybe that helps gQuigs [18:48] bug 1126449 in Ubuntu QA Website "Getting a historical results report for a product is difficult" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1126449 [18:49] oh good lord - that's so much higher than high it's untrue ... [18:49] it's got so bad now I get a script is unresponsive warning with it [18:50] lol [18:50] I'd laugh - but I use that function :( [18:51] elfy: mention that in the bug! :) [18:52] elfy: I'm not 100% sure what report this is referring to.... [18:52] gQuigs: go here http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/315/builds [18:53] just above the products in the main part of the page - not the side [18:53] look for See removed and superseded builds - hit that - then I'll see you in a while ;) [18:54] and frankly these issues aren't new - everyone involved in here with it knows what's wrong and needs sorting [18:56] elfy: oh, ok.. I'll let you too it then.. just noticed that the bug isn't actionable from someone who doesn't know that already... [18:57] heh.. pretty bad.. but did load in 1 minute for me [18:57] * gQuigs wish he was used to webapps being faster than that generally [18:57] gQuigs: I don't mean to sound despondent about these things - it's just that I am ;) [18:59] dkessel, you are a captive audience, and I would agree with elfy. The historical results is a big one, probably the biggest. The next has to do with the UI layout. knome actually worked on a really nice mockup with me and other a bit ago. It would be nice to have it implemented as a longer term thing [19:01] dkessel, [19:01] I'd have thought that the UI layout would be good if we could get bugs listed instead of icons at the same time [19:02] check it out: http://imgur.com/PT7horN [19:02] elfy, did you ever see this ^^? === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr [19:03] balloons: excellent - this looks much more usable then the current UI [19:05] balloons: no - but I rather like that :) [19:06] dkessel, if you pm me your email I'll send you along a thread with some more info [19:06] make the bugs draggable to the fail/pass dialogues and I'd be a lot happier than I am atm :) [19:07] elfy, I don't know why it's broken.. it works on my 'test' site [19:07] balloons: and I suppose that making the trackers usable for those reporting probably trumps reporting for the few [19:08] so - exospehere for UI importance, thermosphere for reporting - then merely high for the remainder :p [19:09] elfy, I would say historical reporting is a big one.. but yes, changing the UI layout is big. Those two I suspect are the big ones to get right first [19:09] yea - I would think the remainder would then logically suggest importance after those 2 [19:10] I would stand on wxl's side of the fence on gathering information as easily as possible for QA teams/leads etc [19:16] charles, elopio asking if the transfer indicator should be visible if there's no transfer in progress [19:16] alesage, the answer is no [19:16] alesage, this was a recent change in design & code [19:16] for a long time it was visible regardless of transfer status [19:17] charles super, similar to desktop in that way [19:17] alesage, https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-transfer/+bug/1377275 [19:17] Ubuntu bug 1377275 in Messaging Menu "Indicators should only be visible if they contain data" [High,Confirmed] [19:17] charles thanks; elopio ^^ [19:17] thanks [20:41] balloons, dkessel: oi [20:41] evening knome [20:42] hey elfy :) [20:59] knome, howdy [21:00] got your email, and sure === salem_ is now known as _salem