=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
q3k | Hm. Is there any particular reason why ARM Ubuntu packages come without static libraries? | 18:58 |
---|---|---|
q3k | I need to link statically against libdevmapper and libudev from Go, and it's ruining my day :< | 18:59 |
infinity | q3k: So don't link statically (or, y'know, use Go). | 20:00 |
q3k | That's not really solving my problem :P | 20:00 |
q3k | I can link Go dynamically but it's all shitty and seems to crush in weird places (ugh Go) | 20:01 |
q3k | But I can't really escape that codebase. | 20:01 |
infinity | q3k: So, you could file bugs on both packages to produce and ship the .a, but it's not going to get fixed in the middle of release week. | 20:02 |
q3k | yeah, I already did this for libdevmapper, but I think there's gonna be like 9001 other packages that will also require to be fixed | 20:03 |
q3k | and it's weird, because all these packages seem to have .a's in amd64 | 20:03 |
q3k | and this is my real question - why is that? Is that a decision from the package maintianers, or just nobody really gave a crap about static libraries before me? | 20:04 |
infinity | q3k: Err, no. It doesn't have a .a on either arch. | 20:06 |
infinity | q3k: There should be no discrepancy, where do you see one? | 20:07 |
infinity | q3k: libudev-dev and libdevmapper-dev on amd64 sure don't have static libs in them. | 20:07 |
q3k | oh, right | 20:07 |
q3k | not on trusty | 20:07 |
q3k | only on precise | 20:08 |
q3k | well, fuck me | 20:08 |
q3k | my bad ,_, | 20:08 |
q3k | http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/amd64/libudev-dev/filelist | 20:08 |
q3k | vs | 20:08 |
q3k | http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/amd64/libudev-dev/filelist | 20:08 |
q3k | sorry about this, let me take this to somewhere else than -arm then. | 20:09 |
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!