| imgbot | === trainguards: IMAGE 293 building (started: 20141020 02:05) === | 02:04 |
|---|---|---|
| imgbot | === trainguards: RTM IMAGE 118 building (started: 20141020 03:05) === | 03:04 |
| === karni-eod is now known as karni | ||
| imgbot | === trainguards: IMAGE 293 DONE (finished: 20141020 03:55) === | 03:54 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/293.changes === | 03:54 |
| imgbot | === trainguards: RTM IMAGE 118 DONE (finished: 20141020 04:20) === | 04:19 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/118.changes === | 04:19 |
| ricmm | bzoltan: so only 107+ ? 106 and 105 clean? | 12:08 |
| ricmm | bzoltan: basically just want to know if 105 is broken, and if 107 is broken for you then try to roll back to qtdeclarative5-qtmir-plugin to 0.4.3+14.10.20141013-0ubuntu1 | 12:09 |
| bzoltan | ricmm: yes, up until 106 it was OK and from 107 the UITK AP tests are broken | 12:10 |
| ricmm | ok | 12:10 |
| ricmm | in that case its the desktop file reader changes | 12:10 |
| bzoltan | ricmm: I have not yet tried to roll back | 12:10 |
| bzoltan | ricmm: do you know who yo talk for the fix? | 12:11 |
| ricmm | bzoltan: dandrader, gerry, kgunn | 12:12 |
| ricmm | but first do confirm with a rollback of qtmir | 12:12 |
| ricmm | just to make sure the pinpointed version is correct | 12:12 |
| bzoltan | ricmm: OK, so it is 0.4.3 | 12:13 |
| bzoltan | ricmm: is it a trival downgrade? | 12:13 |
| ricmm | bzoltan: apt-get install qtdeclarative5-qtmir-plugin=0.4.3+14.10.20141013-0ubuntu1 | 12:14 |
| bzoltan | ricmm: cool, thank you ... doing it right now | 12:15 |
| Saviq | davmor2, bug #1383277 | 12:34 |
| ubot5 | bug 1383277 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "Power dialog sometimes shown on resume" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1383277 | 12:34 |
| popey | ooh, i have been seeing that too | 12:35 |
| Mirv | bfiller: I published the rtm-002 now. | 12:35 |
| bfiller | Mirv: thanks, would be great if we could respin a mako image with that | 12:36 |
| Mirv | bfiller: I'll ping og_ra when it has migrated to release pocket | 12:37 |
| Mirv | bfiller: I wonder if we should try to get it to utopic too? I'm not sure if those ubuntu-phone thread repliers are using rtm or utopic | 12:38 |
| bfiller | Mirv: we should probably get it to ubuntu as well, I think the people were using rtm but we should to be safe | 12:39 |
| popey | Saviq: davmor2 bug 1383279 | 12:39 |
| ubot5 | bug 1383279 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "power button events queued, should probably be dropped" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1383279 | 12:39 |
| Saviq | popey, a | 12:39 |
| Saviq | h | 12:39 |
| Saviq | popey, reassigned to u-s-c | 12:40 |
| Mirv | bfiller: ^ that 001 will have it, kicked build button. | 12:40 |
| bfiller | Mirv: thanks | 12:46 |
| bfiller | Mirv: could you create silos for line 56 and 57 when you have a chance? | 12:46 |
| Mirv | ogra_: bill requested ^ above at least mako rtm image build, could you arrange it? the sim unlock problem seen on the mailing list would be now fixed. | 12:55 |
| ogra_ | i cant do a Mako only build | 12:56 |
| ogra_ | but i can indeed trigger an RTM image build | 12:56 |
| Mirv | ogra_: yeah, that's what I thought. I guess that's important enough bug that it'd be nice to have a new image sooner. | 12:57 |
| Mirv | hmm, I guess sil2100 is still stuck somewhere in Frankfurt or so :( | 12:58 |
| ogra_ | right, no issue with that | 12:58 |
| ogra_ | yup, i just saw his mail ... i think his new filght is in 2-3h | 12:58 |
| ogra_ | ... "I'm stuck here until the flight at 17:00 UTC+2" ... | 12:59 |
| ogra_ | even more | 12:59 |
| Mirv | he didn't mail me, but I heard yesterday evening | 12:59 |
| Mirv | that's terrible | 12:59 |
| * ogra_ is on the right MLs :) | 12:59 | |
| Mirv | ogra_: argh, not again... "aren't you on the xyz mailing list" | 13:00 |
| ogra_ | obviously LH screwed up his re-booking | 13:00 |
| Mirv | I wonder if I should be on some more lists.. | 13:00 |
| ogra_ | Mirv, thats the internal foundations list ... i was on that team and didnt unsubscribe when i changed :) | 13:00 |
| Mirv | hehe, right | 13:00 |
| Saviq | jdstrand, hey, could we get your feedback on bug #1383086 please (also, is there a project we could add a task for to request security feedback?) | 13:03 |
| ubot5 | bug 1383086 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "rebooting defeats the screen lock timeout" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1383086 | 13:03 |
| kenvandine | does anyone know why some autopkgtests aren't running? | 13:37 |
| kenvandine | i have ubuntu-system-settings in proposed and excuses says there is a test running | 13:37 |
| kenvandine | but it isn't... last run was a week ago | 13:37 |
| pete-woods | trainguards: if I want to change my mind about the target of my landing (I want to do utopic, rather than rtm), what's the right way to do this? | 13:44 |
| Mirv | pete-woods: you tell the line number and we'll change it :) | 14:10 |
| Mirv | or I will, robru being at his home timezone and sil2100 stuck on Frankfurt airport... | 14:10 |
| Mirv | pete-woods: so, I'd free up the rtm silo and assign utopic one instead | 14:10 |
| kenvandine | Mirv, do you know why we have a bunch of packages stuck in proposed? | 14:11 |
| kenvandine | Mirv, excuses says "test running" | 14:11 |
| kenvandine | but they aren't running :) | 14:12 |
| Mirv | kenvandine: in rtm or utopic? | 14:12 |
| kenvandine | utopic | 14:12 |
| Mirv | oh.. | 14:12 |
| kenvandine | we have packages stuck migrating since friday | 14:12 |
| Mirv | the answer to your question is "no" (do I know). we should probably ping pitti or someone else. | 14:14 |
| cjwatson | ask on #ubuntu-release about such things. | 14:18 |
| pete-woods | Mirv: yes, that would be awesome :) | 14:19 |
| === renato is now known as Guest73089 | ||
| popey | [D/query balloons | 14:22 |
| popey | oops | 14:22 |
| Saviq | Mirv, could we please have a silo for line 42 then, cleaned the utopic-targeted silo ↑ | 14:36 |
| brendand | marcustomlinson, hey | 14:57 |
| marcustomlinson | brendand: hey | 14:58 |
| brendand | marcustomlinson, can we sit for a few minutes and look at your silo? | 14:58 |
| marcustomlinson | brendand: yeah ok | 14:58 |
| brendand | marcustomlinson, dallas right? | 14:58 |
| marcustomlinson | brendand: yep | 14:58 |
| Saviq | Mirv, http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1425 | 15:01 |
| AlbertA | trainguards: line 28 (rtm landing-001) is ready for QA but it's not showing up in the trello queue any ideas? | 15:02 |
| Mirv | pete-woods: the line number, please? :) | 15:13 |
| Mirv | Saviq: on time, great!! | 15:14 |
| Mirv | cjwatson: is vivid open yet? ;) | 15:14 |
| pete-woods | Mirv: line 62 | 15:14 |
| Mirv | pete-woods: oh right it didn't even have an assigned silo. ok then, 016. | 15:15 |
| pete-woods | Mirv: sorry, that's a new line. the original one is 49 | 15:18 |
| Mirv | pete-woods: thanks, freed the silo | 15:19 |
| Mirv | (the line 49) | 15:20 |
| bzoltan | ogra_: sir, where are you? | 15:20 |
| Mirv | Saviq: rtm-015 | 15:20 |
| ogra_ | bzoltan, hmm, i thinnk its is called ballromm B | 15:20 |
| cjwatson | Mirv: no :) | 15:21 |
| popey | davmor2: bug 1383343 | 15:24 |
| ubot5 | bug 1383343 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "Application icons take a long time to load on slow network" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1383343 | 15:24 |
| popey | dunno if we have one already filed for that, seems we should | 15:24 |
| davmor2 | popey: confirmed | 15:26 |
| popey | davmor2: ta | 15:33 |
| === Guest73089 is now known as renatu | ||
| brendand | bzoltan, silo 13 isn't going to land this week you know | 16:25 |
| === mihir_ is now known as mihir | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| robru | Mirv: are you at the sprint? | 17:10 |
| robru | I'm around for any landing needs anybody might have | 17:12 |
| rsalveti | davmor2: I got a silo that's ready for qa to sign it off, but it seems the spreadsheet is not showing that | 17:32 |
| rsalveti | rtm silo 14 | 17:32 |
| rsalveti | Saviq: hey, we want to land https://code.launchpad.net/~mfrey/unity8/lock-fix/+merge/238918 | 17:45 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| rsalveti | Saviq: don't think we're landing more stuff into utopic anymore, so how to proceed with that landing? | 17:45 |
| Saviq | rsalveti, I'm releasing trunk into rtm | 17:45 |
| Saviq | rsalveti, I've a silo already, will take that in | 17:45 |
| rsalveti | Saviq: awesome | 17:46 |
| robru | rsalveti: fixed spreadsheet status of row 48 | 17:47 |
| rsalveti | robru: thanks! | 17:47 |
| robru | there it is ;-) you're welcome! | 17:48 |
| brendand | AlbertA, which bug is silo 17 meant to fix? | 17:48 |
| brendand | AlbertA, i don't see one mentioned in the changelog | 17:48 |
| AlbertA | brendand: https://bugs.launchpad.net/media-hub/+bug/1378311 | 17:49 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1378311 in qtubuntu-media "EndOfStream event not received when QML Video component is destroyed" [Critical,New] | 17:49 |
| brendand | AlbertA, that's not going to land this week though | 17:50 |
| AlbertA | brendand: I believe it was indirectly associated with a bug that was tagged 10-23 | 18:00 |
| AlbertA | brendand: but let me check... | 18:00 |
| Mirv | robru: yes! | 18:07 |
| robru | Mirv: mmmm, how was the flight? /me is super jealous i didn't get to go | 18:07 |
| Mirv | robru: yes, it's nice to have you around, since I'm walking around so much that my response time can vary. | 18:08 |
| Mirv | robru: 1h late (+1.5h US customs queueing), but not too bad especially given how Lukasz is doing. | 18:08 |
| Mirv | I was here at 10pm, which was ok. | 18:08 |
| robru | yeah I saw lukasz' email, that's just brutal | 18:09 |
| ogra_ | something he cal tell his kids about :) | 18:11 |
| ogra_ | *can | 18:11 |
| brendand | bzoltan, ping | 18:12 |
| brendand | ogra_, what happened? | 18:12 |
| ogra_ | brendand, | 18:13 |
| ogra_ | oops | 18:13 |
| ogra_ | brendand, his original flight was overbooked and they screwed up the new booking | 18:13 |
| ogra_ | he should be in the air now (finally) | 18:13 |
| robru | ogra_: landings are open, right? I can publish that? ^ | 18:16 |
| ogra_ | robru, i donkt think landings are open, no | 18:17 |
| robru | hm, rsalveti published himself ;-) | 18:17 |
| ogra_ | but thats the sim lock fix, that has been discussed before ... | 18:17 |
| rsalveti | yeah | 18:18 |
| ogra_ | (talking about rtm-008 and rtm-006) | 18:18 |
| ogra_ | not sure about the mess rsalveti made with rtm-002 | 18:18 |
| ogra_ | :P | 18:18 |
| ogra_ | :) | 18:18 |
| rsalveti | it is ricmm's fault | 18:18 |
| ogra_ | as usual !! | 18:18 |
| ogra_ | robru, we actually planned to build an image once the 006 and 008 packages landed commpletely | 18:19 |
| robru | ogra_: 6 and 8 aren't even started to publish yet, are they being reviewed still? | 18:20 |
| ogra_ | hmm, dunno, i thought Mirv had handled them this morning already | 18:20 |
| ogra_ | though i'm not sure if anything is allowed to land without QA signing off ... brendand ^^ ? | 18:21 |
| robru | ogra_: unless they landed already and there's already two new landings in those silos? ;-) | 18:21 |
| ogra_ | magically with the same packages ? :) | 18:22 |
| Mirv | ogra_: didn't sil write on Friday "This also means we will be unblocking landings through the CI Train now."? | 18:22 |
| brendand | ogra_, no | 18:22 |
| Mirv | ogra_: yes I published the mako sim unlock silo | 18:22 |
| ogra_ | Mirv, well, i think olli still only wanted landings for the critical bugfixes | 18:22 |
| robru | yeah I read something about how landings were unblocked but since it's final freeze it's basically only critical fixes anyway | 18:22 |
| ogra_ | Mirv, and i think every landing needs QA signoff at this point in the release | 18:22 |
| olli | Mirv, ogra_ is right | 18:23 |
| olli | i.e. if on the list, good to land | 18:23 |
| Mirv | ogra_: yes, only rtm14 critical of course | 18:23 |
| olli | if not, then escalation to product team | 18:23 |
| ogra_ | olli, modulo QA signoff indeed :) | 18:23 |
| olli | for exception | 18:23 |
| ogra_ | sine we want to keep brendand and davmor2 busy ;) | 18:23 |
| Mirv | both today's fixes so far were for 2014-10-23 critical ones | 18:23 |
| ogra_ | *since | 18:23 |
| Mirv | ogra_: right, so QA signoff simply to every landing.. | 18:24 |
| ogra_ | yeah | 18:24 |
| Mirv | ricmm: that means I'm changing your "turn off backlight" silo to also requiring signoff | 18:24 |
| ogra_ | Qa might decide the landing is trivial enough to just let it through, but we should get their comment at least | 18:24 |
| Mirv | and ken's system-settings and pete-woods's silo | 18:24 |
| ogra_ | Mirv, a bit late :P | 18:24 |
| Mirv | oh... | 18:25 |
| ogra_ | (given it is already migrating) | 18:25 |
| ricmm | :) | 18:25 |
| Mirv | right :) | 18:25 |
| olli | Mirv, checking the tags only is not sufficient | 18:25 |
| olli | as anyone can set the tags and sometimes they get set by accident | 18:25 |
| Mirv | and Saviq's unity8 landing | 18:26 |
| olli | the list from my mail is the authoritive source | 18:26 |
| ogra_ | well, only landing team should set them ... (though indeed everyone can set them, the landing team simply needs to check twice) | 18:26 |
| Mirv | olli: right.. so the 10/16 email. check. | 18:26 |
| olli | Mirv, 10/23 ;) | 18:27 |
| Mirv | olli: yes, 10/23 email sent on 10/16 :) | 18:27 |
| olli | hah | 18:27 |
| olli | I can see now how this gets confusing | 18:27 |
| Mirv | Saviq: so, I can immediately see your unity8 landing has bugs listed not on the List, so they should be escalated if wanted in | 18:28 |
| rsalveti | but we're not just accepting MRs for the bugs from that email | 18:30 |
| rsalveti | afaik we're back in the game and landing criticals | 18:30 |
| rsalveti | even if not for this deadline | 18:30 |
| davmor2 | ogra_: I'm so going to slap you into the middle of next month | 18:31 |
| Mirv | rsalveti: reading olli above it sounds like only bugs from the e-mail, or would need contacting the product team | 18:31 |
| rsalveti | doesn't make sense, we had that for one week only, for the purpose of that milestone | 18:31 |
| rsalveti | olli: isn't that the case? | 18:31 |
| ogra_ | rsalveti, as i understood we only land what has been approved by olli, pmcgowan or vicotr ... and then only after QA signed it off | 18:32 |
| rsalveti | as we're fixing the other critical bugs, and we want to land them | 18:32 |
| rsalveti | ogra_: I thought that was only for the previous milestone | 18:32 |
| olli | rsalveti, only what's on the list for 10/23 | 18:32 |
| ogra_ | (heh, vicotr ... victors evil russian brother) | 18:32 |
| rsalveti | olli: why that? | 18:32 |
| rsalveti | why did we decide to push the same requirements for 23? | 18:32 |
| olli | rsalveti, ideally, we shouldn't fix bugs that aren't on the list, unless the list is wrong or there is a good opportunity | 18:33 |
| rsalveti | olli: well, we have people enough to fix some other criticals | 18:33 |
| rsalveti | same that happened last week | 18:33 |
| ogra_ | rsalveti, the bugs simply need to be sent to either of these three and be added to the list | 18:33 |
| Mirv | yes, that's what Saviq said too, they have more people than bugs on the list | 18:33 |
| rsalveti | we're just flushing them now | 18:33 |
| rsalveti | ogra_: right, I don't understand why we need that | 18:33 |
| Mirv | it does make sense to fix later critical bugs earlier | 18:33 |
| rsalveti | we have the rtm14 bug list | 18:33 |
| rsalveti | exactly | 18:33 |
| olli | rsalveti, the intention is to reduce churn & regression risk | 18:33 |
| rsalveti | if it's on the rtm14 critical list, let's land it | 18:34 |
| ogra_ | rsalveti, because they want to asses the risk for their product | 18:34 |
| rsalveti | olli: but them we'll never fix every bug | 18:34 |
| rsalveti | it's just a waste of time | 18:34 |
| rsalveti | we should land every critical we have now | 18:34 |
| rsalveti | as before | 18:34 |
| rsalveti | anytime | 18:34 |
| nik90 | olli: is the rtm14 critical list public? Since I need to check if some alarm bugs are on that list which would affect user experience. | 18:34 |
| rsalveti | we can't land on utopic, can't land criticals out of that list | 18:34 |
| * ogra_ doesnt care either way, i just know what was requested | 18:34 | |
| rsalveti | will just take vacations | 18:34 |
| ogra_ | in any case everything going into RTM needs QA signoff ... regardless of the list | 18:35 |
| Mirv | nik90: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/+bugs?field.tag=rtm14 | 18:35 |
| olli | rsalveti, let's chat in the break | 18:35 |
| rsalveti | olli: sure | 18:35 |
| olli | rsalveti, vacation or improve test coverage or ... | 18:35 |
| rsalveti | but I'm in favor of always landing critical fixes, sooner the better | 18:35 |
| ogra_ | olli, there are a good bunch of bugs that wont affect krillin but mako ... which we definitely want tto have fixed | 18:35 |
| olli | rsalveti, I'd be with you if the overall number of bugs would go down | 18:36 |
| nik90 | Mirv: and If I need to request a bug to be on that list, do I ask olli and victorp? | 18:36 |
| rsalveti | olli: but that's because we still have bugs | 18:36 |
| rsalveti | ignoring that is just ignoring the reality that we have more bugs | 18:36 |
| Mirv | nik90: so basically any bug that both has the tag "rtm14" and is Critical. then we have an these "touch-2014-10-23" milestones additionally, and this List we're talking about is about those subsets of the whole list | 18:36 |
| rsalveti | the bug number will still increase for a while | 18:36 |
| rsalveti | until it's stable | 18:36 |
| rsalveti | we now have way more people using the product | 18:36 |
| rsalveti | expect more bugs | 18:36 |
| nik90 | Mirv: ok | 18:36 |
| Mirv | ogra_: what was the policy on adding 'rtm14' tag itself? | 18:37 |
| ogra_ | uh, i forgot | 18:37 |
| bzoltan | brendand: pong | 18:37 |
| Mirv | yeah, me too :P | 18:37 |
| ogra_ | heh | 18:37 |
| ogra_ | sil might know | 18:37 |
| rsalveti | I just think we'll never ship if we keep this process as is | 18:37 |
| rsalveti | but anyway, will complain in the corridor | 18:38 |
| olli | :) | 18:38 |
| Mirv | nik90: well, for now contact me or sil2100 when you've a bug that is critical (that part you can set yourself in your own projects) and that would also like to have the 'rtm14' tag. | 18:38 |
| bzoltan | brendand: Is it because of the UITK or is there a generic freeze? | 18:38 |
| nik90 | Mirv: ack | 18:38 |
| olli | Mirv, rtm14 is for you to express that this is relevant for the product | 18:38 |
| rsalveti | we're only landing ones that already has a deadline, just not for 23 | 18:38 |
| Mirv | nik90: ^ ok there you go, you can add rtm14 for your own project when you think it should be in the radar as a critical bug | 18:38 |
| Mirv | olli: thanks. | 18:39 |
| bzoltan | elopio: the AP failures are same with the qtdeclarative5-qtmir-plugin:armhf 0.4.4+14.10.20141013-0ubuntu1 | 18:39 |
| rsalveti | postponing something that was originally for 30 just because we can't include it for 23 makes no sense | 18:39 |
| rsalveti | made sense last week because of the reason of the deadline | 18:39 |
| pmcgowan | rsalveti, you can, if its rtm and crit | 18:39 |
| rsalveti | pmcgowan: olli said I can only land stuff on the 23 list | 18:40 |
| pmcgowan | ok go yell at him then :) | 18:40 |
| elopio | bzoltan: do you mean, the same +70 errors? | 18:40 |
| Mirv | I think that was the plan :) | 18:40 |
| rsalveti | pmcgowan: that's what I'm doing here | 18:40 |
| rsalveti | :-) | 18:40 |
| olli | pmcgowan, hey... | 18:40 |
| brendand | bzoltan, the landings are restricted to ollis list | 18:41 |
| bzoltan | elopio: yes | 18:41 |
| pmcgowan | heh olli's list | 18:41 |
| bzoltan | elopio: I have flashed the 118 image and downgraded that package. | 18:41 |
| bzoltan | brendand: Well, obviously I am not happy for it. But can not do much I guess. I hope that the V queue will soon open and I can start landing there. | 18:44 |
| ogra_ | Mirv, so what about the SIM lock stuff ? i cant see it on the dashbaodr | 19:20 |
| ogra_ | wow, what a typo | 19:20 |
| ogra_ | Mirv, i would actually like to trigger an image build ( rsalveti wants one too) ... but i cant seem to find the SIM lock issue landing anywhere | 19:21 |
| ogra_ | ah, found it ... line 39 ... and it actually landed | 19:23 |
| * ogra_ triggers a build | 19:23 | |
| ogra_ | imgbot, stunt | 19:23 |
| * imgbot rolls on its back and purrs | 19:23 | |
| ogra_ | good :) | 19:23 |
| olli | lol | 19:24 |
| cjwatson | bzoltan1: Friday, hopefully | 19:25 |
| bzoltan1 | cjwatson: Friday is good, thanks | 19:26 |
| cjwatson | not promising but we've managed to be up and running within a day of release before ... | 19:26 |
| bzoltan1 | sure, I totally understand | 19:27 |
| imgbot | === trainguards: RTM IMAGE 119 building (started: 20141020 19:30) === | 19:29 |
| Mirv | ogra_: yes, thanks! | 19:32 |
| Saviq | Mirv, there actually *is* a DO_NOT_ADD_RTM option ;) | 19:33 |
| Mirv | Saviq: oh, right, it is there! | 19:34 |
| ogra_ | WHY_DO_ALL_OPTIONS_SCREAM ? | 19:34 |
| Saviq | ogra_, BECAUSE_THEYRE_IMPORTANT | 19:34 |
| ogra_ | AH_THAT_MAKES_SENSE_THEN | 19:35 |
| robru | bzoltan: row 70 is missing something | 20:27 |
| Mirv | robru: oops :) I added it | 20:27 |
| Mirv | we're rapidly trying to get the MR in there. sorry for setting it as "Ready" | 20:28 |
| Mirv | the battle for working wifi | 20:28 |
| robru | Mirv: heh, no worries. | 20:31 |
| bzoltan | robru: Mirv: ready :) | 20:32 |
| robru | bzoltan: Mirv utopic 14 | 20:33 |
| Mirv | bzoltan: building https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-014-1-build/81/console | 20:37 |
| Mirv | zbenjamin: conflicts | 20:38 |
| imgbot | === trainguards: RTM IMAGE 119 DONE (finished: 20141020 20:40) === | 20:39 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/119.changes === | 20:39 |
| ogra_ | wow | 20:39 |
| robru | pete-woods: ^ I'm afraid to publish anything as I've been out for 2 weeks. what's up with silo 16? | 20:39 |
| ogra_ | that was really fast ! | 20:39 |
| robru | hm | 20:40 |
| davmor2 | ogra_: that just means it didn't work and we now all have broken images right? | 20:40 |
| ogra_ | davmor2, well, blame rsalveti :P | 20:40 |
| davmor2 | rsalveti: it's all you fault!!!! | 20:41 |
| kenvandine | davmor2, why can't it ever be your fault? :-p | 20:41 |
| robru | wtfqueuebot | 20:42 |
| davmor2 | kenvandine: it is but most that I let stuff through that was broken by the devs :P | 20:42 |
| Mirv | oh, not again, the 1min repeat queuebot thing | 20:42 |
| ogra_ | it *relly* wants to publish that :) | 20:42 |
| ogra_ | *really | 20:42 |
| kenvandine | really | 20:42 |
| robru | but but! | 20:42 |
| robru | I remember the cause of that issue and the spreadsheet doesn't look like it has that problem right now! | 20:42 |
| Mirv | it became fun when it was repeating three different landings every minute | 20:42 |
| pete-woods | robru: I think it's ready (I mean I've tested it). but I don't know the rules about publishing.. | 20:44 |
| robru | pete-woods: is it a critical bugfix? utopic is in final freeze ;-) | 20:44 |
| pete-woods | robru: it is, yes | 20:45 |
| robru | pete-woods: ok | 20:45 |
| ricmm | :) | 20:46 |
| ricmm | s'il vous plait | 20:46 |
| robru | ricmm: rtm 2 | 20:47 |
| ricmm | robru: thanks | 20:47 |
| robru | ricmm: you're welcome | 20:47 |
| davmor2 | ogra_, rsalveti: why is this image never seeming to finish flashing? | 20:57 |
| davmor2 | ogra_, rsalveti: nevermind it just finished but my god that took a while :) | 20:58 |
| rsalveti | davmor2: hahah | 20:58 |
| rsalveti | I might be able to flash it tomorrow, will take a while to download it | 20:58 |
| rsalveti | really slow | 20:58 |
| cwayne | davmor2, got time for a custom tarball test tomorrow? only critical bug fixes I swear :) | 21:00 |
| robru | somebody who knows stuff let me know if it's actually ok to publish silo rtm 14 | 21:00 |
| davmor2 | cwayne: Where's my fitbit damn you ? possibly depends when | 21:00 |
| robru | or not | 21:00 |
| Mirv | robru: yes, I just published it. so it is on the 10/23 List (on the mailing list), ie ok. | 21:01 |
| robru | ah ok, thanks Mirv | 21:01 |
| Mirv | "10/23 iteration planning" | 21:01 |
| cwayne | davmor2, its in my room | 21:01 |
| cwayne | i dont have a charger for it though :/ but i do have the dongle to sync it | 21:02 |
| balloons | ogra_, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-touch-meta/+bug/1383479 | 21:05 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1383479 in ubuntu-touch-meta (Ubuntu) "Remove autopilot from touch images" [Undecided,New] | 21:05 |
| ogra_ | olli, pmcgowan ^^^ we need to talk about this one | 21:05 |
| olli | ogra_, ack, not sure I fully grasp the implications | 21:08 |
| pmcgowan | ogra_, yeah, this week or next? | 21:19 |
| pmcgowan | balloons, ^^? | 21:21 |
| pmcgowan | ogra_, balloons although if it has a small footprint I suppose there is not so much urgency? | 21:26 |
| ogra_ | pmcgowan, it has a giant dependency chain | 21:33 |
| ogra_ | (it will remove quite a bit of python packages) | 21:33 |
| pmcgowan | that sounds good | 21:33 |
| pmcgowan | so we should do next two weeks | 21:34 |
| ogra_ | pmcgowan, but there is some risk in it, if people dont use out tools for testing but directly call autopilot for example | 21:34 |
| ogra_ | so we should do it early to asess possible fallout | 21:34 |
| pmcgowan | ogra_, who might do that? | 21:34 |
| pmcgowan | ok | 21:34 |
| ogra_ | pmcgowan, well, i know that the unity8 team calls AP directly during developemnt | 21:34 |
| ogra_ | (eaiser than always calling pahblet-test-run if you develop ) | 21:35 |
| pmcgowan | ogra_, so maybe an email to the list to prep folks | 21:35 |
| balloons | pmcgowan, thanks for commenting on it. Sorry, I was offline and missed the discussion | 21:54 |
| balloons | ogra_, pmcgowan, the potential issues also arise from people depending on autopilot or a dependency without declaring it. It's unlikely but possible | 21:54 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!