[00:28] <_zerick_> Some shellshock patch just put /usr/sbin/nologin on some system users, is there any really important issue around this users?
[00:54] <Noskcaj> dupondje, Did you make any progress on unetbootin?
[08:29] <mitya57> Hi, I got a mail that one of packages failed to upload in Vivid: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dhelp/0.6.21+nmu3ubuntu1. Is it a known issue?
[09:41] <cryptohex> hey
[09:41] <cryptohex> http://cryptohex.us.to/?page_id=287
[09:41] <cryptohex> wanna develop AstaraOS together ubuntu
[09:41] <cryptohex> i invite you to #AstaraOS-devel
[09:50] <sladen> cryptohex: those instructions seem to be about Fedora
[09:51] <cryptohex> no sladen
[09:52] <cryptohex> x64 bit has tool
[09:52] <sladen> cryptohex: and the URLs are to one of the Fedora download servers
[09:52] <cryptohex> to convert source code to debian
[09:52] <cryptohex> it call apt too
[09:52] <cryptohex> what
[09:52] <cryptohex> did fedora has rawhide and kernel 3.18-rc1
[09:53] <cryptohex> not even fedora claim my source code
[09:53] <sladen> cryptohex: could you give some context.  What *is* AstaraOS?
[09:53] <sladen> cryptohex: is there an introductory page somewhere?
[09:53] <cryptohex> AstaraOS is coded by The Most High
[09:53] <cryptohex> We decoy it and name it fedora
[09:53] <sladen> cryptohex: and what sort of things does AstaraOS do?
[09:53] <sladen> cryptohex: and which types are users is it aimed at?
[09:54] <cryptohex> AstaraOS is exactly same as linux
[09:54] <cryptohex> with all packages that you never know
[09:54] <cryptohex> such as blender
[09:54] <cryptohex> crypto
[09:54] <cryptohex> satelite kismet
[09:54] <cryptohex> all there
[09:54] <sladen> cryptohex: so these packages specialise it---for what types of users is it specialised?
[09:54] <cryptohex> no all user at all level
[09:55] <cryptohex> exactly look like fedora
[09:55] <cryptohex> but this OS We sold to governor
[09:55] <cryptohex> that's why you keep on heard there is AstaraOS
[09:55] <cryptohex> but they outsource it to redhat
[09:55] <sladen> which governor?
[09:55] <cryptohex> all governor of the world
[09:56] <cryptohex> governor mean goverment
[09:56] <sladen> perhaps the first step would be write all this up in an introductory wiki page somewhere
[09:56] <cryptohex> is part of g20 United Nations Project
[09:56] <cryptohex> nah just write it for me sladen if you want
[09:56] <cryptohex> this already been known for long
[09:56] <cryptohex> We sold 2 version
[09:57] <cryptohex> one  version which they backdoored again
[09:57] <cryptohex> they got that shit again
[09:57] <cryptohex> another version classified is this
[09:57] <cryptohex> from ip .27
[09:57] <sladen> perhaps you could write this up on https://plus.google.com/117769961985459927740/posts
[09:57] <cryptohex> that's 0x71 (xc) Our
[09:57] <cryptohex> i will
[09:58] <cryptohex> take alook at http://getintopc.com
[09:58] <cryptohex> xWindow 10 is windows 10
[09:58] <cryptohex> and just update is windows 11 now
[09:58] <cryptohex> this not microsoft too
[09:58] <cryptohex> is Our code
[09:58] <cryptohex> look like windows
[09:59] <cryptohex> exactly  like windows
[09:59] <sladen> that's wonderful.  This IRC channel is for discussion of development of Ubuntu
[09:59] <cryptohex> check that website
[09:59] <cryptohex> i know
[09:59] <sladen> so at the moment this all sounds a little off-topic
[09:59] <cryptohex> that's why i invite you to join Us
[09:59] <cryptohex> you know linux take source code from gentoo
[09:59] <sladen> I'm sure anyone interested will have the information to do so
[10:00] <cryptohex> gentoo never publish it anymore
[10:00] <cryptohex> that's why the package is just the same and the same
[10:00] <cryptohex> just couple of patch and gui modify
[10:00] <cryptohex> try the OS you'rself
[10:00] <cryptohex> find me at #AstaraOS-devel
[10:00] <cryptohex> if you want
[10:01] <cryptohex> see ya
[10:02] <maxb> How very bizarre. I really can't tell if that was a troll or someone very off topic and having difficulty communicating.
[10:02]  * darkxst thinks cryptohex needs to improve his trolling skills ;) 
[11:18] <sacarlson> where is a good place to go to find people to test some of my new software?
[11:19] <sacarlson> they are packaged for ubuntu and mint
[11:51] <xperia> hi all. could it be that ubuntu has some seriuos problem with multi threading on a Intel Dual Core Processor ?
[11:51] <xperia> i have installed ubuntu on a Laptop beside Windows7 and i am not able to run multithreaded Programms in Ubuntu anymore in contrary to Windows on the same Laptop Machine. i tryed also to boot Ubuntu with the Boot Options ht=on and acpi=ht but when i do lscpu i dont see more than 1 Thread per CPU even the Processor has HyperThreading and MultiCore Support is enabled in the Bios.
[11:53] <jtaylor> how many cpus does /proc/cpuinfo show?
[11:53] <jtaylor> also what exactly does unable to run mean?
[11:55] <xperia> jtaylor: just one second i am checking the logs to see if there are some strange problems. got a read error "unable to read, broken pipe"
[11:58] <xperia> jtaylor: cpuinfo show two cores and two siblings. unable to run mean when i have a mutlithreaded programm then at maximum two threads are executed instead of say 8 or 16
[12:19] <rbasak> xperia: it's up to your program to decide how many threads to use. Sometimes programs look in /proc/cpuinfo (or similar) to come up with a reasonable guess.
[12:20] <rbasak> It doesn't matter if you only have one core. A program can still start as many threads as it wants.
[12:20] <rbasak> So you'll need to look into the program you're running to see what it's detecting and how it decides how many threads to run.
[12:24] <xperia> rbasak: the thing is that it use a simple Parallel For Loop and in ubuntu this Parallel For Loop is not executed in parallel like it executed in windows. in windows the Parallel Loop is executed at once multiple times while in ubuntu there is no parallel execution and for my surprise the whole programm just stall. something is very weired with ubuntu for sure. it is not the programm.
[12:26] <xperia> i have read that there is some difference between the 64Bit Version of Ubuntu and 32 Bit Version. on my Ubuntu 32Bit Server edition the programms works very well but on my Ubuntu 64Bit Laptop Desktop the Programm does not work like it should.
[12:38] <sacarlson> xperia: I haven't noticed any difference 64 32.  I just upgraded about 5 weeks ago and all seems to work the same
[13:49] <rbasak> xperia: written in what language? It may be something to do with the language implementation.
[13:50] <rbasak> Presumably the implementation is different between Windows and Linux?
[13:50] <rbasak> You might need to tell it how many threads to use.
[19:00] <CryoHexy> hey
[19:00] <CryoHexy> why you call me here guys
[19:20] <smecin-0x71> ckorn
[19:20] <smecin-0x71> what's up
[19:20] <rww> smecin-0x71: Is there something we can help you with?
[19:21] <smecin-0x71> nothing i heard you want to call me here
[19:21] <smecin-0x71> what do you want to ask
[19:21] <rww> smecin-0x71: that's highly doubtful.
[19:21] <smecin-0x71> ah okay than
[19:22] <rww> ^ skraito, network problem who released a "distro" that is a Fedora ISO renamed and claims Jesus helped him do it, for anyone wondering about the tone
[19:27] <NikTh> Hello people.
[19:28] <NikTh> Upgraded to 15.04 from day one. Today I faced a little problem (proposed repos are enabled-always), with ofono package.
[19:29] <NikTh> Funny thing here is, I didn't even know the existence of this package. Now I know :)
[19:30] <NikTh> A .service file is missing and it cannot be installed properly. The weird thing is that NetworkManager does not start properly without ofono. Am I right ?
[20:13] <Noskcaj> pitti, Should we sync gobject-introspection or is there something that needs waiting for?
[20:38] <Noskcaj> If a package builds on ppc64le without autoreconf are we ok to start syncing from debian again?
[22:06] <ari-tczew> cyphermox: do you have a plan for a merge network-manager 0.9.10 from Debian?
[23:03] <cjwatson> Noskcaj: please preserve autoreconf patches, there may be future ports that need similar
[23:54] <Laney> Noskcaj: just leave that for us to deal with please
[23:54] <Laney> (gi)